- From: Michael A. Puls II <shadow2531@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 10:52:03 -0400
- To: "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On 7/6/07, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> wrote: > On Fri, 06 Jul 2007 21:06:34 +0200, Michael A. Puls II > <shadow2531@gmail.com> wrote: > > It's one of those things where there might not be a really good reason > > to do it, but you should do it anyway. > > Anyone who has comments on the source code of the html4-differences or > html5 specification should talk to Bert Bos from the W3C about changing > the CSS Module generator script that generates the final source code for > this and many other specifications. Thanks. I hope it was understood that I wasn't saying the markup was bad. I was just saying that it will be perceived that way (in general) by those using XHTML markup. We would probably get better acceptance if we cater to that group a little at first and let them warm up to the HTML way again. I'll have to keep track of comments on sites so I can cite examples in the future. -- Michael
Received on Saturday, 7 July 2007 14:52:12 UTC