- From: Andrew Sidwell <takkaria@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2007 00:58:35 +0100
- To: Andrew Ramsden <andrew@irama.org>
- CC: aurélien levy <aurelien.levy@free.fr>, public-html@w3.org
Andrew Ramsden wrote: > > This may be off-topic for "html 5 and accessibility", but I agree with > your assertion that a di element would clarify the semantic relationship > between dt and dd elements. > > The specific use-case of dl that I see as ambiguous without a di element > is: > <dl> > <dt></dt> > <dt></dt> > <dd></dd> > </dl> > > Does this represent a two terms (one without a definition), or a single > term with two possible term variations? In what way is it a definition term if it's not used as part of a definition? The only common-sense answer is that both terms share the same definition. Andrew Sidwell
Received on Sunday, 1 July 2007 23:58:35 UTC