- From: Ben Boyle <benjamins.boyle@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 20:39:51 +1000
- To: "Simon Pieters" <simonp@opera.com>
- Cc: "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>
Would it fit better in section 2, which is all about the DOM? I would like it moved (but I'm just one person). I think section 3 could be quite good for authors, but I think it would be simpler if microsyntaxes (being a very implementation/parsing biased section) were not part of that section. I think it's unnecessarily complex otherwise. Could be a nice, neat section about HTML elements, attributes and their semantics. On 7/29/07, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> wrote: > On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 12:31:17 +0200, Ben Boyle <benjamins.boyle@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > 3.2. Common microsyntaxes > > http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#common1 > > > > This was an interesting read. Very complex, obviously not aimed at > > authors (particularly the common parser idioms bit, which is > > unfortunately the very first bit one reads). > > > > I'd like to propose this section be moved to section 8. The HTML > > syntax. I think it fits better there. > > Common microsyntaxes is not specific to the HTML syntax. This processing > occurs after the DOM has been built, and also applies to the XML > serialization. Moreover, the authoring requirements in common > microsyntaxes also apply when the DOM is changed dynamically. > > > [...] > > -- > Simon Pieters > Opera Software >
Received on Monday, 30 July 2007 10:39:53 UTC