- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 11:11:20 +0300
- To: Sander Tekelenburg <st@isoc.nl>
- Cc: public-html@w3.org
On Jul 3, 2007, at 11:01, Sander Tekelenburg wrote: > At 10:02 +0300 UTC, on 2007-07-03, Henri Sivonen wrote: > > [... <video>, <audio>, and <canvas>] > >> FWIW, <picture> is significantly different because: >> 1) Still images already work *natively* in browsers and WYSIWYGish >> editors using <img> since way back when. > > That depends on your definition of "work". If you consider the alt and > longdesc attributes, images still don't really work. Not for > authoring and > not in UAs (and thus not for users). *Still images* work. That is, you can get a still image rendered using <img>. You are saying that the markup for still images isn't ideal when the user needs something other than a still image. -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Tuesday, 3 July 2007 08:11:40 UTC