- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 09:25:54 -0500
- To: Robert Burns <rob@robburns.com>
- Cc: HTML Working Group <public-html@w3.org>
On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 03:40 -0500, Robert Burns wrote: [...] > Please feel free to add review comments on this subsection at > (signing comments will help facilitate followup): > <http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/DraftReviews1/Root> It seems to me that "signed comments" are easier handled in email. email is good for individual opinions and new arguments. Topics in the ESW wiki should be written in the community voice (aka neutral point of view/NPOV), to the extent that's feasible. "Try to write in the community voice, but if you don't see a way to do that, you should sign your contributions" -- http://esw.w3.org/topic/QA It's good to _cite_ email arguments from the wiki. But for new arguments/opinions, I'd rather we use email. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Monday, 9 July 2007 14:26:05 UTC