public-html@w3.org from June 2007: by date

Saturday, 30 June 2007
- Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Peter Krantz
- Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Bill Mason
- Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Philip TAYLOR
- Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Peter Krantz
- Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Bill Mason
- Re: Why the style attribute shouldn't be abandoned David Choi
- Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Ian Hickson
- Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Sander Tekelenburg
- Re: html 5 and accessibility issue Lachlan Hunt
- Re: html 5 and accessibility issue Daniel Schattenkirchner
- Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Robert Burns
- Re: html 5 and accessibility issue aurélien levy
- Re: html 5 and accessibility issue Robert Burns
- Re: html 5 and accessibility issue Geoffrey Sneddon
- Re: html 5 and accessibility issue Lachlan Hunt
- Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Geoffrey Sneddon
- Re: html 5 and accessibility issue aurélien levy
- Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Ben Boyle
- Re: html 5 and accessibility issue Steven Faulkner
- [html] HTML elements index Jens Meiert
- Re: Why the style attribute shouldn't be abandoned Rene Saarsoo
- Re: html 5 and accessibility issue Anne van Kesteren
- Re: html 5 and accessibility issue Robert Burns
- Re: html 5 and accessibility issue Anne van Kesteren
- Re: html 5 and accessibility issue aurélien levy
- Re: html 5 and accessibility issue Anne van Kesteren
- Re: html 5 and accessibility issue aurélien levy
- Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Peter Krantz
- Re: html 5 and accessibility issue Anne van Kesteren
- Re: html 5 and accessibility issue Anne van Kesteren
- html 5 and accessibility issue aurelien levy
- Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Robert Burns
- Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Anne van Kesteren
- Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Lachlan Hunt
- Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Lachlan Hunt
- Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Robert Burns
- Re: Why the style attribute shouldn't be abandoned Lachlan Hunt
- Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Joshue O Connor
- Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Lachlan Hunt
- Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Henri Sivonen
- Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Thomas Broyer
- LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Peter Krantz
- Re: Un-subscribe from public-html without leaving HTMLWG? Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo
- Re: Un-subscribe from public-html without leaving HTMLWG? Ben 'Cerbera' Millard
- Wiki page for style attribute Dannii
- Re: Why the style attribute shouldn't be abandoned Michael A. Puls II
- Re: LONGDESC Wiki Page Ian Hickson
- Re: some thoughts on objections to publishing ""HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Steven Faulkner
- LONGDESC Wiki Page Gregory J. Rosmaita
- Re: Why the style attribute shouldn't be abandoned Patrick Garies
- Re: some thoughts on objections to publishing ""HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Robert Burns
- Re: Un-subscribe from public-html without leaving HTMLWG? Patrick Garies
Friday, 29 June 2007
- Re: some thoughts on objections to publishing ""HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: some thoughts on objections to publishing ""HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Ian Hickson
- Re: some thoughts on objections to publishing ""HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Steven Faulkner
- Why the style attribute shouldn't be abandoned Rene Saarsoo
- Re: some thoughts on objections to publishing ""HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Robert Burns
- Re: some thoughts on objections to publishing ""HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Henri Sivonen
- Re: some thoughts on objections to publishing ""HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Steven Faulkner
- Re: some thoughts on objections to publishing ""HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Ian Hickson
- Re: some thoughts on objections to publishing ""HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: some thoughts on objections to publishing ""HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Robert Burns
- Re: some thoughts on objections to publishing ""HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Robert Burns
- Re: some thoughts on objections to publishing ""HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Steven Faulkner
- Re: some thoughts on objections to publishing ""HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Joshue O Connor
- Re: some thoughts on objections to publishing ""HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Lachlan Hunt
- Re: some thoughts on objections to publishing ""HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Dan Connolly
- Re: Un-subscribe from public-html without leaving HTMLWG? Dan Connolly
- some thoughts on objections to publishing ""HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Dan Connolly
- Re: Un-subscribe from public-html without leaving HTMLWG? Sierk Bornemann
- Re: dropping longdesc attribute Joshue O Connor
- Re: Un-subscribe from public-html without leaving HTMLWG? Nathan Youngman
- Re: danger of null value for summary attribute [Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Joshue O Connor
- RE: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Evans, Donald
- Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Jon Gunderson
- Re: [whatwg] XMLHttpRequest for missing file Thomas Broyer
- Re: Dates in HTML 5 Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
- Re: what must be done to expose longdesc? [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Joshue O Connor
- Re: rationale for preserving longdesc in HTMLx [Re: dropping longdesc attribute] Joshue O Connor
- Re: rationale for preserving longdesc in HTMLx [Re: dropping longdesc attribute] Joshue O Connor
- Re: what must be done to expose longdesc? [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Jason White
- Re: usefulness of longdesc & digitization of books & historical works [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Joshue O Connor
- Re: Dates in HTML 5 Ben Boyle
- Re: what must be done to expose longdesc? [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Joshue O Connor
- Re: SURVEY: Release "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" as a W3C Working Draft? formal decision Anne van Kesteren
- Re: [A11y] Using Longdesc, will it fly? Joshue O Connor
- Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] James Graham
- Un-subscribe from public-html without leaving HTMLWG? Ben 'Cerbera' Millard
- Re: Dates in HTML 5 Karl Dubost
- Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft gonchuki
Thursday, 28 June 2007
- RE: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft Alejandro Fernández + MEDIADVANCED
- RE: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft Alejandro Fernández + MEDIADVANCED
- SURVEY: Re: HTML WG | Potential West Coast Face to Face? Dan Connolly
- Re: Dates in HTML 5 Ian Hickson
- Re: SURVEY: Release "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" as a W3C Working Draft? formal decision Adam Nash
- HTML5 and AT integration (was: Re: Summary: Naming Issue, Proposals) Henri Sivonen
- Re: Dates in HTML 5 liorean
- Re: Dates in HTML 5 liorean
- Re: Dates in HTML 5 liorean
- Re: Dates in HTML 5 Robert Burns
- Re: Dates in HTML 5 Thomas Broyer
- Re: Dates in HTML 5 Thomas Broyer
- Re: Summary: Naming Issue, Proposals gonchuki
- Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Thomas Broyer
- Re: Summary: Naming Issue, Proposals Murray Maloney
- Re: Summary: Naming Issue, Proposals Gregory J. Rosmaita
- Re: PWDs do NOT crave catering, but EQUAL access Gregory J. Rosmaita
- PWDs do NOT crave catering, but EQUAL access [was: Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listen] Gregory J. Rosmaita
- Re: Summary: Naming Issue, Proposals Jirka Kosek
- Re: Summary: Naming Issue, Proposals Gregory J. Rosmaita
- Re: Summary: Naming Issue, Proposals paul haine
- Summary: Naming Issue, Proposals Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer
- Re: About dropping the style attribute Maurice Carey
- Re: How to productively contribute Laura Carlson
- Re: Author-friendlier definition of <object> (was Re: fear of "invisible metadata") Sander Tekelenburg
- Re: Video Descriptions Lachlan Hunt
- Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft Olivier GENDRIN
- Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened Sander Tekelenburg
Wednesday, 27 June 2007
- Re: Dates in HTML 5 Rob Marshall
Thursday, 28 June 2007
- Re: Author-friendlier definition of <object> (was Re: fear of "invisible metadata") Call Center-Asistan
- Re: Author-friendlier definition of <object> (was Re: fear of "invisible metadata") scott lewis
- Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened Dave Singer
- Re: Author-friendlier definition of <object> (was Re: fear of "invisible metadata") Sander Tekelenburg
- Re: Video Descriptions (Was: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened) Smylers
- Re: Author-friendlier definition of <object> (was Re: fear of "invisible metadata") scott lewis
- Re: coordinating with WAI Simon Pieters
- Re: Author-friendlier definition of <object> (was Re: fear of "invisible metadata") Sander Tekelenburg
- Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Philip TAYLOR
- RE: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened Gavin Pearce
- Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Henri Sivonen
- Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened Philip TAYLOR
Wednesday, 27 June 2007
- RE: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Alastair Campbell
Thursday, 28 June 2007
- Re: About dropping the style attribute Henri Sivonen
- Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened Lachlan Hunt
- coordinating with WAI Karl Dubost
- Re: Why XHTML 5 is a bad name... Patrick Garies
- Re: How to productively contribute Ian Hickson
- Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Martijn
- Re: Why XHTML 5 is a bad name... Lachlan Hunt
- Re: SURVEY: Release "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" as a W3C Working Draft? formal decision Karl Dubost
- Re: Why XHTML 5 is a bad name... Adam Nash
- Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft Channy Yun
- Re: How to productively contribute Robert Burns
Wednesday, 27 June 2007
- Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft Cameron McCormack
- Re: How to productively contribute Ian Hickson
- Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft Karl Dubost
- Re: Is there an existing FAQ for public-html? Karl Dubost
- Re: About dropping the style attribute gonchuki
- Re: How to productively contribute Robert Burns
- Re: Is there an existing FAQ for public-html? Henri Sivonen
- Is there an existing FAQ for public-html? scott lewis
- Re: How to productively contribute Ian Hickson
- Re: [whatwg] Entity parsing [trema/diaeresis vs umlaut] Thomas Broyer
- Re: Proposal: accessibility revision for the img element... Thomas Broyer
- Re: Dates in HTML 5 Ian Hickson
- Re: About dropping the style attribute Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo
- Re: About dropping the style attribute Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo
- Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Simon Pieters
- Re: addition or subtrraction? [was Re: dropping longdesc attribute] William Loughborough
- Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Aaron Leventhal
- Re: How to productively contribute Robert Burns
- Re: Dates in HTML 5 Robert Burns
- Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Robert Burns
- Re: About dropping the style attribute gonchuki
- Re: SURVEY: Release "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" as a W3C Working Draft? formal decision Sander van Lambalgen
- Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Robert Burns
- Re: SURVEY: Release "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" as a W3C Working Draft? formal decision Robert Burns
- Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened Robert Burns
Tuesday, 26 June 2007
- Dates in HTML 5 Simon Grant
Wednesday, 27 June 2007
- Re: danger of null value for summary attribute [Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Robert Burns
- Re: Proposal: accessibility revision for the img element... Robert Burns
Tuesday, 26 June 2007
- Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft Channy Yun
- Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft Channy Yun
- Re: About dropping the style attribute Ara Pehlivanian
- Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Gijs Kruitbosch
- Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? michael lawley
- RE: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] John Foliot - Stanford Online Accessibility Program
Wednesday, 27 June 2007
- Re: Why XHTML 5 is a bad name... Robert Burns
- Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Simon Pieters
- Re: About dropping the style attribute Daniel Glazman
- Re: About dropping the style attribute Shane Thacker
- RE: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Don Raikes
- Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] William Loughborough
- Re: HTML Design Principles to WD? Josh Sled
- Re: SURVEY: Release "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" as a W3C Working Draft? formal decision Dan Connolly
- Re: Author-friendlier definition of <object> Sander Tekelenburg
- Re: About dropping the style attribute Jens Meiert
- Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened Smylers
- Re: About dropping the style attribute Anne van Kesteren
- Re: About dropping the style attribute Jon Barnett
- Re: About dropping the style attribute gonchuki
- Re: Author-friendlier definition of <object> Lachlan Hunt
- Re: SURVEY: Release "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" as a W3C Working Draft? formal decision Henri Sivonen
- Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Aaron Leventhal
- Re: danger of null value for summary attribute [Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Sander Tekelenburg
- Re: Proposal: accessibility revision for the img element... Thomas Broyer
- Re: SURVEY: Release "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" as a W3C Working Draft? formal decision Anne van Kesteren
- Re: SURVEY: Release "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" as a W3C Working Draft? formal decision Sylvain Eliade
- Re: Why XHTML 5 is a bad name... Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer
- Re: HTML Design Principles to WD? Laura Carlson
- Re: Proposal: accessibility revision for the img element... Sander Tekelenburg
- Re: SURVEY: Release "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" as a W3C Working Draft? formal decision Henri Sivonen
- Re: SURVEY: Release "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" as a W3C Working Draft? formal decision Sylvain Eliade
- Re: difference between @alt and @title Sander Tekelenburg
- Re: Author-friendlier definition of <object> (was Re: fear of "invisible metadata") Henri Sivonen
- Re: Author-friendlier definition of <object> (was Re: fear of "invisible metadata") Sander Tekelenburg
- Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Simon Pieters
- Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) Raphael Champeimont (Almacha)
- Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Ben Boyle
- Re: danger of null value for summary attribute [Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Ben Boyle
- Re: danger of null value for summary attribute [Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Ben Boyle
- Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Henri Sivonen
- Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened Ben Boyle
Tuesday, 26 June 2007
- Re: About dropping the style attribute Craig Francis
Wednesday, 27 June 2007
- Re: About dropping the style attribute Jens Meiert
- Re: Why XHTML 5 is a bad name... Nicolas LE GALL
- Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. bhopgood@brookes.ac.uk
- Re: About dropping the style attribute Karl Dubost
- Re: Why XHTML 5 is a bad name... Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: About dropping the style attribute Patrick Garies
- Re: SURVEY: Release "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" as a W3C Working Draft? formal decision Lachlan Hunt
- Re: About dropping the style attribute Daniel Glazman
- Re: About dropping the style attribute Dannii
- Re: Why XHTML 5 is a bad name... Lachlan Hunt
- Re: Why XHTML 5 is a bad name... Daniel Glazman
- Re: Proposal: accessibility revision for the img element... Karl Dubost
- Re: Why XHTML 5 is a bad name... Michael A. Puls II
- Re: Why XHTML 5 is a bad name... Karl Dubost
- Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. Karl Dubost
- Re: Why XHTML 5 is a bad name... Arun
Tuesday, 26 June 2007
- Re: Why XHTML 5 is a bad name... Dylan Smith
- Why XHTML 5 is a bad name... Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer
- Re: SURVEY: Release "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" as a W3C Working Draft? formal decision Thomas Broyer
- Re: usefulness of longdesc & digitization of books & historical works [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] William Loughborough
- How to productively contribute Ian Hickson
- Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Smylers
- Re: About dropping the style attribute Daniel Glazman
- Re: difference between @alt and @title [was RE: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Robert Burns
- Re: HTML Design Principles to WD? Laura Carlson
- Re: difference between @alt and @title [was RE: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Monika Trebo
- Re: About dropping the style attribute gonchuki
- Re: HTML Design Principles to WD? Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: About dropping the style attribute Jens Meiert
- Re: About dropping the style attribute gonchuki
- Re: SURVEY: Release "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" as a W3C Working Draft? formal decision Jirka Kosek
- Re: Author-friendlier definition of <object> (was Re: fear of "invisible metadata") Laura Carlson
- Re: HTML Design Principles to WD? Jirka Kosek
Monday, 25 June 2007
- Re: usefulness of longdesc & digitization of books & historical works [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] James Graham
- Re: danger of null value for summary attribute [Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] James Graham
Tuesday, 26 June 2007
- Re: About dropping the style attribute James Craig
- Re: Author-friendlier definition of <object> (was Re: fear of "invisible metadata") Lachlan Hunt
- Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened Lachlan Hunt
- Re: HTML Design Principles to WD? Lachlan Hunt
- SURVEY: Release "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" as a W3C Working Draft? formal decision Dan Connolly
- Re: addition or subtrraction? [was Re: dropping longdesc attribute] Dan Connolly
- Re: addition or subtrraction? [was Re: dropping longdesc attribute] Laura Carlson
- Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Robert Burns
- HTML Design Principles to WD? Anne van Kesteren
- Author-friendlier definition of <object> (was Re: fear of "invisible metadata") Sander Tekelenburg
- Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Smylers
- Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Smylers
- Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Denis Boudreau (WebConforme)
- Re: Nested browsing context (was: fear of "invisible metadata") Thomas Broyer
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Sander Tekelenburg
- Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Sander Tekelenburg
- Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Robert Burns
- Re: About dropping the style attribute Jens Meiert
- Re: Proposal: accessibility revision for the img element... Anne van Kesteren
- RE: dropping longdesc attribute DESCHAMPS Stephane ROSI/SI CLIENT
- Re: Proposal: accessibility revision for the img element... Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
- Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Aaron Leventhal
- Re: About dropping the style attribute Henri Sivonen
- Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Henri Sivonen
- Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. Jirka Kosek
- Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. Karl Dubost
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Sander Tekelenburg
- Re: sharing the burden: authors and authoring tools Sander Tekelenburg
- Re: Proposal: accessibility revision for the img element... Robert Burns
- Re: About dropping the style attribute Jens Meiert
- Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Aaron Leventhal
- Re: Proposal: accessibility revision for the img element... Anne van Kesteren
- Re: About dropping the style attribute Jens Meiert
- Re: Proposal: accessibility revision for the img element... Ben Boyle
- Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. Lachlan Hunt
- Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Robert Burns
- Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Thomas Broyer
- Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Robert Burns
- Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Robert Burns
- Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Henri Sivonen
- Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Robert Burns
- Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: relevance of diverse HTML authoring practices [was: Versioning re-visited ...] scott lewis
- Re: The point of XHTML 2 Robert Burns
- Re: dropping longdesc attribute Karl Dubost
- Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Robert Burns
- Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Doug Schepers
- Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] William Loughborough
- Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Karl Dubost
- Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Doug Schepers
- Re: BarCamp like for the HTML WG. Sam Ruby
- Re: relevance of diverse HTML authoring practices [was: Versioning re-visited ...] Karl Dubost
- BarCamp like for the HTML WG. Karl Dubost
- Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Monika Trebo
Monday, 25 June 2007
- Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Ian Hickson
- Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Jeff Schiller
- Re: addition or subtrraction? [was Re: dropping longdesc attribute] Dan Connolly
- Re: addition or subtrraction? [was Re: dropping longdesc attribute] Dan Connolly
- Re: addition or subtrraction? [was Re: dropping longdesc attribute] Laura Carlson
- Re: addition or subtrraction? [was Re: dropping longdesc attribute] Philip & Le Khanh
- Re: The point of XHTML 2 Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer
- Re: addition or subtrraction? [was Re: dropping longdesc attribute] Dan Connolly
- Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Ian Hickson
- sharing the burden: authors and authoring tools Gregory J. Rosmaita
- Re: relevance of diverse HTML authoring practices [was: Versioning re-visited ...] Philip & Le Khanh
- Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Dan Connolly
- addition or subtrraction? [was Re: dropping longdesc attribute] Gregory J. Rosmaita
- The point of XHTML 2 Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Dan Connolly
- Re: About dropping the style attribute Henri Sivonen
- Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Jeff Schiller
- Re: About dropping the style attribute Jon Barnett
- 3.14.13. The area element Marco Neumann
- Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Ian Hickson
- Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Jeff Schiller
- RE: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] John Foliot
- Re: [A11y] requiring alt Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Maurice Carey
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Sander Tekelenburg
- Re: rationale for preserving longdesc in HTMLx [Re: dropping longdesc attribute] Maurice Carey
- Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft Maurice Carey
- Re: About dropping the style attribute Maurice Carey
- Re: About dropping the style attribute Maurice Carey
- Re: "placeholder link" scott lewis
- Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Maurice Carey
- Re: About dropping the style attribute Maurice Carey
- Re: "placeholder link" Sander Tekelenburg
- Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) Maurice Carey
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Maurice Carey
- Re: relevance of diverse HTML authoring practices [was: Versioning re-visited ...] scott lewis
- Re: [A11y] requiring alt Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Laura Carlson
- Re: the fallicy of the term "fallback content" David Poehlman
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Sander Tekelenburg
- Re: About dropping the style attribute Bruce Lawson
- Re: relevance of diverse HTML authoring practices [was: Versioning re-visited ...] Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
- Re: "placeholder link" scott lewis
- Re: "placeholder link" Lachlan Hunt
- Re: dropping longdesc attribute Maurice Carey
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Maurice Carey
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Maurice Carey
- the fallicy of the term "fallback content" Gregory J. Rosmaita
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
- Re: Issues list for HTML WG Re: dropping longdesc attribute Martijn
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Dan Connolly
- Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? Dan Connolly
- Re: "placeholder link" Sander Tekelenburg
- Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? Dan Connolly
- Re: About dropping the style attribute gonchuki
- Re: dropping longdesc attribute Eric Eggert
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" gonchuki
- Re: what must be done to expose longdesc? [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] gonchuki
- Re: Issues list for HTML WG Re: dropping longdesc attribute Dan Connolly
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Simon Pieters
- Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? bhopgood@brookes.ac.uk
- Re: Issues list for HTML WG Gregory J. Rosmaita
- Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? Anne van Kesteren
- Re: Choosing name for XML serialization Lachlan Hunt
- Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? (comments mailing list) Dan Connolly
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: Choosing name for XML serialization Dan Connolly
- Re: "placeholder link" Simon Pieters
- Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? Dan Connolly
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Sander Tekelenburg
- Re: Proposal: accessibility revision for the img element... Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: "placeholder link" Sander Tekelenburg
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Simon Pieters
- Re: Issues list for HTML WG Re: dropping longdesc attribute Martijn
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Sander Tekelenburg
- Re: Issues list for HTML WG Re: dropping longdesc attribute Martijn
- Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: dropping longdesc attribute Olivier GENDRIN
- Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Martijn
- Re: Issues list for HTML WG Re: dropping longdesc attribute Anne van Kesteren
- Re: Proposal: accessibility revision for the img element... Olivier GENDRIN
- Re: Issues list for HTML WG Re: dropping longdesc attribute Martijn
- Re: Proposal: accessibility revision for the img element... Sander Tekelenburg
- Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? Anne van Kesteren
- Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) Henri Sivonen
- Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? bhopgood@brookes.ac.uk
- Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) scott lewis
- Re: "placeholder link" Ben Boyle
- Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Henri Sivonen
- Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Anne van Kesteren
- Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Mark Birbeck
- Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? Anne van Kesteren
- Re: danger of null value for summary attribute [Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Bill Mason
- Re: Choosing name for XML serialization Lachlan Hunt
- Re: Choosing name for XML serialization Ian Hickson
- Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? Anne van Kesteren
- Re: [A11y] requiring alt Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Choosing name for XML serialization Julian Reschke
- Re: relevance of diverse HTML authoring practices [was: Versioning re-visited ...] Maciej Stachowiak
- UA requirements vs. document conformance (Was: Re: Choosing name for XML serialization) Henri Sivonen
- Re: Choosing name for XML serialization Ian Hickson
- Re: "placeholder link" Simon Pieters
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Thomas Broyer
- A couple of HTML5 editorial comments Cameron McCormack
- Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Julian Reschke
- Re: danger of null value for summary attribute [Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Robert Burns
- Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Ian Hickson
- Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) Ian Hickson
- Re: Issues list for HTML WG Re: dropping longdesc attribute Ian Hickson
- Re: danger of null value for summary attribute [Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Bill Mason
- Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Julian Reschke
- Re: danger of null value for summary attribute [Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Gregory J. Rosmaita
- Proposal: accessibility revision for the img element... Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? Karl Dubost
- Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? Charles McCathieNevile
- Issues list for HTML WG Re: dropping longdesc attribute Karl Dubost
- Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? Charles McCathieNevile
Sunday, 24 June 2007
- Some issues [was: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"?] Diego La Monica (IWA/HWG)
Monday, 25 June 2007
- Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? Karl Dubost
- Re: "placeholder link" Sander Tekelenburg
- Re: relevance of diverse HTML authoring practices [was: Versioning re-visited ...] Karl Dubost
- Re: rationale for preserving longdesc in HTMLx [Re: dropping longdesc attribute] Bill Mason
- Re: Choosing name for XML serialization Lachlan Hunt
- Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? Sander Tekelenburg
- Re: danger of null value for summary attribute [Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Bill Mason
Sunday, 24 June 2007
- Re: Seeking test data with bogus byte sequences from Henri Sivonen on 2007-06-19 (public-html@w3.org from June 2007) Martin Duerst
Monday, 25 June 2007
- Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Charles McCathieNevile
Sunday, 24 June 2007
- Re: relevance of diverse HTML authoring practices [was: Versioning re-visited ...] Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Mark Birbeck
- Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: "placeholder link" Lachlan Hunt
- Re: "placeholder link" (was HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft) Sander Tekelenburg
- Re: About dropping the style attribute Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: About dropping the style attribute Robert Burns
- Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? Robert Burns
- Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Mark Birbeck
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Sander Tekelenburg
- Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? Robert Burns
- Re: usefulness of longdesc & digitization of books & historical works [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Craig Francis
- Re: danger of null value for summary attribute [Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Craig Francis
- Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? Dan Connolly
- Re: relevance of diverse HTML authoring practices [was: Versioning re-visited ...] Geoffrey Sneddon
- Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? Kornel Lesinski
- usefulness of longdesc & digitization of books & historical works [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Gregory J. Rosmaita
- the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Gregory J. Rosmaita
- Re: About dropping the style attribute Sam Ruby
- Re: [A11y] requiring alt Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Gregory J. Rosmaita
- what must be done to expose longdesc? [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Gregory J. Rosmaita
- Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft Simon Pieters
- danger of null value for summary attribute [Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Gregory J. Rosmaita
- Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? Robert Burns
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" [was Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element] Gregory J. Rosmaita
- rationale for preserving longdesc in HTMLx [Re: dropping longdesc attribute] Gregory J. Rosmaita
- Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft Johannes Lichtenberger
- Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? Jeff Schiller
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Gregory J. Rosmaita
- Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft Martijn
- Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft Lachlan Hunt
- Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft Johannes Lichtenberger
- Re: About dropping the style attribute Patrick Garies
- Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Tom Morris
- Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Kornel Lesinski
- Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Craig Francis
- Typo. correction : relevance of diverse HTML authoring practices Philip & Le Khanh
- Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Kornel Lesinski
- Re: About dropping the style attribute Craig Francis
- Re: About dropping the style attribute Julian Reschke
- Re: About dropping the style attribute Anne van Kesteren
- Re: HTML 5 removed "numeric character reference" term - why? Anne van Kesteren
- Re: About dropping the style attribute Håkon Wium Lie
- Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) liorean
- Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4" cadunn
- Re: About dropping the style attribute Ben Boyle
- Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? Ben Boyle
Saturday, 23 June 2007
- Re: About dropping the style attribute Craig Francis
- About dropping the style attribute Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo
- Re: HTML 5 removed "numeric character reference" term - why? Mike Brown
Friday, 22 June 2007
- Re: dropping longdesc attribute Monika Trebo
Saturday, 23 June 2007
- Re: figures, images and fallback content (was: fear of "invisible metadata") Robert Burns
- Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Tom Morris
- Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) Craig Francis
- ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? Dan Connolly
- Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) Dimitri Glazkov
- Re: relevance of diverse HTML authoring practices [was: Versioning re-visited ...] Philip & Le Khanh
- Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Jeff Schiller
- relevance of diverse HTML authoring practices [was: Versioning re-visited ...] Dan Connolly
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Anne van Kesteren
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Ben Boyle
- Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Craig Francis
- Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) Craig Francis
- Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) Craig Francis
- Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) Craig Francis
- Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) Craig Francis
- Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) Craig Francis
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Craig Francis
- Re: dropping longdesc attribute Steven Faulkner
- Re: dropping longdesc attribute Ian Hickson
- Re: dropping longdesc attribute Steven Faulkner
- Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) Dannii
- Re: dropping longdesc attribute Lachlan Hunt
- Re: dropping longdesc attribute Steven Faulkner
- figures, images and fallback content (was: fear of "invisible metadata") Ben Boyle
- Re: dropping longdesc attribute Lachlan Hunt
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Robert Burns
- Re: dropping longdesc attribute scott lewis
- Re: dropping longdesc attribute scott lewis
- Re: dropping longdesc attribute WebConforme
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Ben Boyle
Friday, 22 June 2007
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Robert Burns
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Laura Carlson
- Re: #refs in .../current-work/multipage/ Ian Hickson
- Re: Attributes and "Expandos" Ian Hickson
- Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) Dan Connolly
- Re: Attributes and "Expandos" Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Attributes and "Expandos" Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Brendan Cullen
- Attributes and "Expandos" Travis Leithead
- Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
- On dictature of a language, was: requiring alt attribute, was: fear of "invisible metadata" Dimitri Glazkov
- Re: More on <CAPTION> element etc Sander Tekelenburg
- Re: HTML 5 removed "numeric character reference" term - why? Anne van Kesteren
- Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) Dimitri Glazkov
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Sander Tekelenburg
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Maurice Carey
- Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) Dimitri Glazkov
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Sander Tekelenburg
- Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) Sam Ruby
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
- Re: #refs in .../current-work/multipage/ Philip Taylor
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Ben Boyle
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Maurice Carey
- Re: <code type="..."> Maurice Carey
- #refs in .../current-work/multipage/ Josh Sled
- Re: <code type="..."> Josh Sled
- Re: More on <CAPTION> element etc Joshue O Connor
- Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) Ian Hickson
- Re: HTML 5 removed "numeric character reference" term - why? Lachlan Hunt
- Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) Alexandre Alapetite
- Re: dropping longdesc attribute Lachlan Hunt
- Re: E-mail subscription and RSS Nikola Mitic
- Re: More on <CAPTION> element etc Sander Tekelenburg
- Re: More on <CAPTION> element etc Joshue O Connor
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Sander Tekelenburg
- Re: HTML 5 removed "numeric character reference" term - why? David Håsäther
- Re: More on <CAPTION> element etc Sander Tekelenburg
- Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: HTML 5 removed "numeric character reference" term - why? Mike Brown
- Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Jirka Kosek
- Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: HTML 5 removed "numeric character reference" term - why? Simon Pieters
- Re: HTML 5 removed "numeric character reference" term - why? Ian Hickson
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Joshue O Connor
- Re: <code type="..."> Thomas Pike
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Joshue O Connor
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" [was Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element] Simon Pieters
- Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Jirka Kosek
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Joshue O Connor
- Re: HTML 5 removed "numeric character reference" term - why? David Håsäther
- Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Jirka Kosek
- Re: C0 control characters in HTML 5 Ian Hickson
- Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Jirka Kosek
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Philip & Le Khanh
- Re: HTML 5 removed "numeric character reference" term - why? Mike Brown
- Re: C0 control characters in HTML 5 Mike Brown
- Re: HTML 5 removed "numeric character reference" term - why? Ian Hickson
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Ben Boyle
- Re: C0 control characters in HTML 5 Ian Hickson
- Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) Ian Hickson
- Re: [Spam] Re: More on <CAPTION> element etc Ben Boyle
- Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Karl Dubost
- Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Karl Dubost
- Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Ben Boyle
- Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) Karl Dubost
- Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) Karl Dubost
- Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) Alexandre Alapetite
- Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) Sam Ruby
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" [was Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element] Charles McCathieNevile
Thursday, 21 June 2007
- Re: <code type="..."> Josh Sled
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" [was Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element] Maurice Carey
- Re: <code type="..."> Maurice Carey
- Re: [Spam] Re: More on <CAPTION> element etc Maurice Carey
- Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) Ian Hickson
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Philip & Le Khanh
- Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) Philip & Le Khanh
- Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) Philip & Le Khanh
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Philip & Le Khanh
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Joshue O Connor
- Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Robert Burns
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" [was Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element] Joshue O Connor
- Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) Philip & Le Khanh
- Re: Horizontal menu-2 Maurice Carey
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" [was Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element] Maurice Carey
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" [was Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element] Maurice Carey
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Maurice Carey
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Maurice Carey
- Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) Ian Hickson
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Maurice Carey
- Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: [a11y] Requiring alt Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Laura Carlson
- Re: [a11y] Requiring alt Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Joshue O Connor
- Re: [a11y] Requiring alt Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Laura Carlson
- Re: [a11y] Requiring alt Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Joshue O Connor
- Re: More on <CAPTION> element etc Joshue O Connor
- Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) Stephen Stewart
- Re: <code type="..."> liorean
- Re: [a11y] Requiring alt Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Laura Carlson
- Re: dropping longdesc attribute Anne van Kesteren
- Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) Thomas Broyer
- [a11y] Requiring alt Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: More on <CAPTION> element etc Sander Tekelenburg
- dropping longdesc attribute Laura Carlson
- Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) Roger Johansson
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Laura Carlson
- Re: Choosing name for XML serialization Julian Reschke
- Re: Choosing name for XML serialization Lachlan Hunt
- Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) Jirka Kosek
- Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
- Re: <code type="..."> Josh Sled
- Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
- Re: [Spam] Re: More on <CAPTION> element etc Joshue O Connor
- Re: More on <CAPTION> element etc James Graham
- Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Julian Reschke
- Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Jirka Kosek
- Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" [was Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element] Sander Tekelenburg
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Joshue O Connor
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" [was Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element] Joshue O Connor
- More on <CAPTION> element etc Joshue O Connor
- Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) Jirka Kosek
- Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element Sander Tekelenburg
Friday, 15 June 2007
- Re: 'role' should be property Dmitry Turin
Monday, 11 June 2007
- Re[2]: eleding, sag, seribute Dmitry Turin
- Re: Horizontal menu-2 Dmitry Turin
- Re: Horizontal menu-2 Dmitry Turin
- Re: <code type="..."> Dmitry Turin
- Re: 'role' should be property Dmitry Turin
- Re[2]: WF2, abolish <button type=remove> Dmitry Turin
- Re: 'role' should be property Dmitry Turin
- Re: WF2, attach hidden xml Dmitry Turin
Thursday, 21 June 2007
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" [was Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element] Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Karl Dubost
Wednesday, 20 June 2007
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Robert Burns
- Re: feed for HTML WG current events? [was: Introducing myself] Sander Tekelenburg
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" [was Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element] Ben Boyle
- Re: Parsing of HTML fragments Asbjørn Ulsberg
- Re: feed for HTML WG current events? [was: Introducing myself] Olivier GENDRIN
- Re: minor copy edits needed in HTML 5 draft (control over /TR/html5/ ) Ian Hickson
- Re: feed for HTML WG current events? [was: Introducing myself] Karl Dubost
- Re: feed for HTML WG current events? [was: Introducing myself] Sander Tekelenburg
- Re: Parsing of HTML fragments Ian Hickson
Tuesday, 19 June 2007
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" [was Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element] Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" James Graham
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Craig Francis
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" aurélien levy
- Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. Geoffrey Sneddon
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Geoffrey Sneddon
- Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. Dan Connolly
- wiki gardening around versioning/doctypes issue Dan Connolly
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" [was Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element] Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. Philip & Le Khanh
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" [was Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element] Joshue O Connor
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" [was Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element] Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" [was Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element] Joshue O Connor
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Joshue O Connor
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Joshue O Connor
- Re: minor copy edits needed in HTML 5 draft (control over /TR/html5/ ) Dan Connolly
- Re: [A11y] requiring alt Re: fear of "invisible metadata" aurélien levy
- Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. Ian Hickson
- Re: [A11y] requiring alt Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: [A11y] requiring alt Re: fear of "invisible metadata" aurélien levy
- Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. Philip & Le Khanh
- Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. Henri Sivonen
- Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. Henri Sivonen
- Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. Henri Sivonen
- Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. Henri Sivonen
- Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. Ben Boyle
- Seeking test data with bogus byte sequences Henri Sivonen
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Ben Boyle
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" [was Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element] Henri Sivonen
- Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. Karl Dubost
- Re: [A11y] requiring alt Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Maciej Stachowiak
- [A11y] requiring alt Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Chris Adams
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Chris Adams
- Re: minor copy edits needed in HTML 5 draft (control over /TR/html5/ ) Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Maciej Stachowiak
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Lachlan Hunt
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" [was Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element] Karl Dubost
Monday, 18 June 2007
- Re: Scope and obsolescence of other specs (was Re: minor copy edits...) Ian Hickson
- Re: minor copy edits needed in HTML 5 draft (control over /TR/html5/ ) Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: minor copy edits needed in HTML 5 draft (control over /TR/html5/ ) Charles McCathieNevile
- Re: minor copy edits needed in HTML 5 draft (control over /TR/html5/ ) Ian Hickson
- Re: feed for HTML WG current events? [was: Introducing myself] Sam Ruby
- Re: minor copy edits needed in HTML 5 draft (control over /TR/html5/ ) Michael A. Puls II
- Re: feed for HTML WG current events? [was: Introducing myself] Karl Dubost
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" [was Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element] Philip & Le Khanh
- Re: minor copy edits needed in HTML 5 draft (control over /TR/html5/ ) Mike Brown
- HTML 5 removed "numeric character reference" term - why? Mike Brown
- C0 control characters in HTML 5 Mike Brown
- Re: minor copy edits needed in HTML 5 draft (control over /TR/html5/ ) Ian Hickson
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" [was Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element] Joshue O Connor
- Scope and obsolescence of other specs (was Re: minor copy edits...) Mike Brown
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" [was Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element] James Graham
- Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. Philip & Le Khanh
- Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. Dan Connolly
- feed for HTML WG current events? [was: Introducing myself] Dan Connolly
- Re: Introducing myself John Foliot
- [Fwd: Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Joshue O Connor
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Joshue O Connor
- Re: minor copy edits needed in HTML 5 draft (control over /TR/html5/ ) Michael A. Puls II
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Laura Carlson
- Re: minor copy edits needed in HTML 5 draft (control over /TR/html5/ ) Ian Hickson
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Joshue O Connor
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Joshue O Connor
- Re: please reivew mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0 Sean Owen
- Re: Introducing myself Olivier GENDRIN
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" [was Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element] Joshue O Connor
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Laura Carlson
- Re: wiki HTMLTableAccessibility content restored Dan Connolly
- Re: Introducing myself Dan Connolly
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Gregory J. Rosmaita
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
- Re: minor copy edits needed in HTML 5 draft (control over /TR/html5/ ) Dan Connolly
- Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. Anne van Kesteren
- Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
- Re: HTML5 Differences from HTML4 Anne van Kesteren
- Re: HTML5 Differences from HTML4 Maurice Carey
- Re: fear of "invisible metadata" Lachlan Hunt
- Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tut

public-html@w3.org from June 2007 by date