W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > June 2007

Re: volunteers to review a few sections of the HTML 5 spec in detail?

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 14:00:16 +0200
To: "Henrik Dvergsdal" <henrik.dvergsdal@hibo.no>, "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.ttlqaqe864w2qv@annevk-t60.oslo.opera.com>

On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 13:22:34 +0200, Henrik Dvergsdal  
<henrik.dvergsdal@hibo.no> wrote:
> I wonder if there are any guidelines for such reviews.
>
> Wouldn't it be useful to have a common set of questions and/or other  
> types of clues towards what we should look for?

I think in general different people look for different things. However,  
here are some ideas:

   * Is the text understandable
     - If not, how can it be improved?

   * Is it implementable?
     - Does the algorithm lead to endless loops?
     - Does the algorithm cause existing web sites to break?

   * Is there room for improvement?
     - If so, what can be improved?


> Or maybe we should just review against the design principles?

That would make sense too.


> I'm also a bit curious about what constitutes a "section".
>
> Should we just follow the divisions in
> http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/?

I think that's mostly up to your own judgement. Just indicate which  
features you have reviewed and maybe point out where they can be found.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Friday, 8 June 2007 12:00:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:00 GMT