W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > June 2007

Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 12:18:06 -0500
To: Philip & Le Khanh <Philip-and-LeKhanh@Royal-Tunbridge-Wells.Org>
Cc: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, HTML Working Group <public-html@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1182273486.6367.173.camel@pav>

On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 16:27 +0100, Philip & Le Khanh wrote:
[...]
>  > The merits _aren't_ obvious. The drawbacks are many, and serious, but the
>  > benefits seem slim and dubious. (This has been discussed to great lengths
>  > in this mailing list over the past months.)
> 
> The benefits seems so obvious (and so essential), and
> the drawbacks so minimal,  that I am at a complete loss to
> understand how the proposal to drop versioning can
> ever have arisen.

If you'd like to discuss versioning, please start a new thread.
This thread is about "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2007 17:18:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:01 GMT