W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > June 2007

Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2))

From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 02:06:55 +0200
To: "Tom Morris" <bbtommorris@gmail.com>, "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.tugaltczwxe0ny@widsith.local>

On Sat, 23 Jun 2007 22:44:56 +0200, Tom Morris <bbtommorris@gmail.com>  

> On 6/23/07, Craig Francis <craig@synergycms.com> wrote:
>>    HTML-XML5
>> This is using the same theory behind naming FTPS and SFTP, where both
>> are two different systems.
> The RDF community has had a similar issue since RDF can be serialized
> in a number of ways. Hence RDF/XML, RDF/N3, RDF/Turtle and RDF/TriX...
> On that basis, why not 'HTML/XML 5' for the XML serialization and

Because somebody would start wondering when the HTML WG started  
re-designing XML, and why. HTML5/XML makes sense though.

just 2 cents worth


   Charles McCathieNevile, Opera Software: Standards Group
   hablo español  -  je parle français  -  jeg lærer norsk
chaals@opera.com    Catch up: Speed Dial   http://opera.com
Received on Monday, 25 June 2007 00:07:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:22 UTC