On Mon, 04 Jun 2007 09:54:10 +0200, Henrik Dvergsdal <henrik.dvergsdal@hibo.no> wrote: > Since this change made it through the scrutiny of the WHATWG, there must > be a better use case (with research) than this. I'm wondering what the use case for making it less performing is? It seems to me that a more performing site is better for the user and site author. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>Received on Monday, 4 June 2007 08:02:14 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:39:53 GMT