W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > June 2007

Re: toward W3C Working Draft: design principles? spec? other? (survey)

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 14:54:32 +0200
To: "Henrik Dvergsdal" <henrik.dvergsdal@hibo.no>, "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.tted46sh64w2qv@annevk-t60.oslo.opera.com>

On Mon, 04 Jun 2007 14:48:49 +0200, Henrik Dvergsdal  
<henrik.dvergsdal@hibo.no> wrote:
> On 4 Jun 2007, at 14:06, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>>> And what if the rationale and the pros/cons pertaining to a particular  
>>> construct or modification cannot be found anywhere? Should it still be  
>>> left in the spec?
>>
>> You ask on the mailing list?
>
> I don't understand this question. Please rephrase.

If you can't find rationale in the WHATWG or HTML WG mailing list archives  
and are wondering why the feature is in the specification (you can't think  
of any good reasons yourself) you ask on the mailing list what the reasons  
for inclusion are. (And hopefully then someone documents them on a wiki.)


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Monday, 4 June 2007 12:54:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:38:45 UTC