public-html@w3.org from June 2007 by author

Aaron Leventhal

Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Wednesday, 27 June)
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Wednesday, 27 June)
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Tuesday, 26 June)
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Tuesday, 26 June)

Adam Nash

Re: SURVEY: Release "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" as a W3C Working Draft? formal decision (Thursday, 28 June)
Re: Why XHTML 5 is a bad name... (Thursday, 28 June)
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (Thursday, 14 June)

Al Gilman

Re: headers attribute debate (Wednesday, 6 June)

Alastair Campbell

RE: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Wednesday, 27 June)

Alejandro Fernández + MEDIADVANCED

RE: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (Thursday, 28 June)
RE: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (Thursday, 28 June)

Alexandre Alapetite

Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) (Friday, 22 June)
Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) (Friday, 22 June)
Schematron for testing HTML 5 stricter content model (Saturday, 16 June)

Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo

Re: Un-subscribe from public-html without leaving HTMLWG? (Saturday, 30 June)
Re: About dropping the style attribute (Wednesday, 27 June)
Re: About dropping the style attribute (Wednesday, 27 June)
About dropping the style attribute (Saturday, 23 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" [was Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element] (Tuesday, 19 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" [was Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element] (Tuesday, 19 June)

Anne van Kesteren

Re: html 5 and accessibility issue (Saturday, 30 June)
Re: html 5 and accessibility issue (Saturday, 30 June)
Re: html 5 and accessibility issue (Saturday, 30 June)
Re: html 5 and accessibility issue (Saturday, 30 June)
Re: html 5 and accessibility issue (Saturday, 30 June)
Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki (Saturday, 30 June)
Re: SURVEY: Release "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" as a W3C Working Draft? formal decision (Friday, 29 June)
Re: About dropping the style attribute (Wednesday, 27 June)
Re: SURVEY: Release "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" as a W3C Working Draft? formal decision (Wednesday, 27 June)
HTML Design Principles to WD? (Tuesday, 26 June)
Re: Proposal: accessibility revision for the img element... (Tuesday, 26 June)
Re: Proposal: accessibility revision for the img element... (Tuesday, 26 June)
Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? (Monday, 25 June)
Re: Issues list for HTML WG Re: dropping longdesc attribute (Monday, 25 June)
Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? (Monday, 25 June)
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) (Monday, 25 June)
Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? (Monday, 25 June)
Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? (Monday, 25 June)
Re: About dropping the style attribute (Sunday, 24 June)
Re: HTML 5 removed "numeric character reference" term - why? (Sunday, 24 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Saturday, 23 June)
Re: HTML 5 removed "numeric character reference" term - why? (Friday, 22 June)
Re: dropping longdesc attribute (Thursday, 21 June)
Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. (Monday, 18 June)
Re: HTML5 Differences from HTML4 (Monday, 18 June)
Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. (Monday, 18 June)
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (Friday, 15 June)
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (Friday, 15 June)
Re: [doctype] useless/not required or useful/required (Friday, 15 June)
Re: [doctype] useless/not required or useful/required (Friday, 15 June)
Re: [doctype] useless/not required or useful/required (Friday, 15 June)
Re: dialog vs. dialogue (dl) (Friday, 15 June)
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (Thursday, 14 June)
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (Thursday, 14 June)
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (Thursday, 14 June)
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (Thursday, 14 June)
Re: HTML 5 and conformance checkers (Thursday, 14 June)
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (Thursday, 14 June)
HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (Wednesday, 13 June)
Re: please reivew mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0 (Wednesday, 13 June)
Re: Note on terminology: Attribute types (Tuesday, 12 June)
Re: Conceptual modelling of attributes (Tuesday, 12 June)
Re: Conceptual modelling of attributes (Monday, 11 June)
Re: Conceptual modelling of attributes (Monday, 11 June)
Re: volunteers to review a few sections of the HTML 5 spec in detail? (Friday, 8 June)
Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? (Wednesday, 6 June)
Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? (Wednesday, 6 June)
Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? (Wednesday, 6 June)
Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? (Wednesday, 6 June)
Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? (Wednesday, 6 June)
Re: Complex Table Examples (Wednesday, 6 June)
Re: toward W3C Working Draft: design principles? spec? other? (survey) (Monday, 4 June)
Re: toward W3C Working Draft: design principles? spec? other? (survey) (Monday, 4 June)
Re: toward W3C Working Draft: design principles? spec? other? (survey) (Monday, 4 June)
Re: toward W3C Working Draft: design principles? spec? other? (survey) (Monday, 4 June)
Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? (Monday, 4 June)
Re: toward W3C Working Draft: design principles? spec? other? (survey) (Monday, 4 June)
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) (Monday, 4 June)
Re: Raising issues in a way that the editors will pay attention to them (Monday, 4 June)
Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? (Monday, 4 June)
Re: headers attribute (Friday, 1 June)

Ara Pehlivanian

Re: About dropping the style attribute (Tuesday, 26 June)

Arun

Re: Why XHTML 5 is a bad name... (Wednesday, 27 June)
HTML WG | Potential West Coast Face to Face? (Wednesday, 13 June)

Asbjørn Ulsberg

Re: Parsing of HTML fragments (Wednesday, 20 June)

aurelien levy

html 5 and accessibility issue (Saturday, 30 June)

aurélien levy

Re: html 5 and accessibility issue (Saturday, 30 June)
Re: html 5 and accessibility issue (Saturday, 30 June)
Re: html 5 and accessibility issue (Saturday, 30 June)
Re: html 5 and accessibility issue (Saturday, 30 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Tuesday, 19 June)
Re: [A11y] requiring alt Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Tuesday, 19 June)
Re: [A11y] requiring alt Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Tuesday, 19 June)
Re: Complex Table Examples (Wednesday, 6 June)
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) (Monday, 4 June)
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) (Sunday, 3 June)
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) (Sunday, 3 June)
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) (Sunday, 3 June)
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) (Sunday, 3 June)
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) (Sunday, 3 June)
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) (Saturday, 2 June)

Ben 'Cerbera' Millard

Re: Un-subscribe from public-html without leaving HTMLWG? (Saturday, 30 June)
Un-subscribe from public-html without leaving HTMLWG? (Friday, 29 June)
Re: Common pool of examples and validation (Saturday, 16 June)
Allow other doctypes (Saturday, 16 June)
<tfoot> at the bottom of <table> (Saturday, 16 June)
Re: please reivew mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0 (Wednesday, 13 June)
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (Wednesday, 13 June)
Re: Common pool of examples and validation (Tuesday, 12 June)
Re: please reivew mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0 (Monday, 11 June)
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) (Wednesday, 6 June)

Ben Boyle

Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki (Saturday, 30 June)
Re: Dates in HTML 5 (Friday, 29 June)
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Wednesday, 27 June)
Re: danger of null value for summary attribute [Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Wednesday, 27 June)
Re: danger of null value for summary attribute [Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Wednesday, 27 June)
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened (Wednesday, 27 June)
Re: Proposal: accessibility revision for the img element... (Tuesday, 26 June)
Re: "placeholder link" (Monday, 25 June)
Re: About dropping the style attribute (Sunday, 24 June)
Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? (Sunday, 24 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Saturday, 23 June)
figures, images and fallback content (was: fear of "invisible metadata") (Saturday, 23 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Saturday, 23 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Friday, 22 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Friday, 22 June)
Re: [Spam] Re: More on <CAPTION> element etc (Friday, 22 June)
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) (Friday, 22 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" [was Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element] (Wednesday, 20 June)
Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. (Tuesday, 19 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Tuesday, 19 June)
Re: Allow other doctypes (Sunday, 17 June)
Re: What is a "state"? (Friday, 15 June)
Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element (Monday, 11 June)

Ben Mason

Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) (Wednesday, 6 June)

bhopgood@brookes.ac.uk

Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. (Wednesday, 27 June)
Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? (Monday, 25 June)
Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? (Monday, 25 June)
Re: [Fwd: Re: toward W3C Working Draft: design principles? spec? other? (survey)] (Tuesday, 5 June)
[Fwd: Re: toward W3C Working Draft: design principles? spec? other? (survey)] (Monday, 4 June)

Bill Mason

Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki (Saturday, 30 June)
Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki (Saturday, 30 June)
Re: danger of null value for summary attribute [Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Monday, 25 June)
Re: danger of null value for summary attribute [Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Monday, 25 June)
Re: rationale for preserving longdesc in HTMLx [Re: dropping longdesc attribute] (Monday, 25 June)
Re: danger of null value for summary attribute [Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Monday, 25 June)
Re: [Fwd: Re: toward W3C Working Draft: design principles? spec? other? (survey)] (Monday, 4 June)
Re: headers attribute (was Re: Form elements) (Sunday, 3 June)
Re: headers attribute (was Re: Form elements) (Friday, 1 June)

Boris Zbarsky

Re: Note on terminology: Attribute types (Tuesday, 12 June)
Re: Conceptual modelling of attributes (Monday, 11 June)
Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? (Friday, 8 June)
Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? (Friday, 8 June)
Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? (Thursday, 7 June)
Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? (Wednesday, 6 June)
Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? (Wednesday, 6 June)
Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? (Tuesday, 5 June)
Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? (Tuesday, 5 June)
Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? (Tuesday, 5 June)
Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? (Monday, 4 June)
Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? (Monday, 4 June)
Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? (Monday, 4 June)
Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? (Sunday, 3 June)
Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? (Sunday, 3 June)

Brendan Cullen

Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Friday, 22 June)

Bruce Lawson

Re: About dropping the style attribute (Monday, 25 June)

cadunn

Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4" (Sunday, 24 June)

Call Center-Asistan

Re: Author-friendlier definition of <object> (was Re: fear of "invisible metadata") (Thursday, 28 June)

Cameron McCormack

Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (Wednesday, 27 June)
A couple of HTML5 editorial comments (Monday, 25 June)
Re: Some DOM related comments (Saturday, 2 June)

Channy Yun

Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (Thursday, 28 June)
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (Tuesday, 26 June)
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (Tuesday, 26 June)

Charles McCathieNevile

Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Thursday, 28 June)
The point of XHTML 2 (Monday, 25 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Monday, 25 June)
Re: Proposal: accessibility revision for the img element... (Monday, 25 June)
Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? (Monday, 25 June)
Proposal: accessibility revision for the img element... (Monday, 25 June)
Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? (Monday, 25 June)
Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? (Monday, 25 June)
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) (Monday, 25 June)
Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? (Sunday, 24 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Friday, 22 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Friday, 22 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Friday, 22 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" [was Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element] (Friday, 22 June)
[a11y] Requiring alt Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Thursday, 21 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" [was Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element] (Thursday, 21 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" [was Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element] (Tuesday, 19 June)
[A11y] requiring alt Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Tuesday, 19 June)
Re: minor copy edits needed in HTML 5 draft (control over /TR/html5/ ) (Tuesday, 19 June)
Re: minor copy edits needed in HTML 5 draft (control over /TR/html5/ ) (Monday, 18 June)
Re: minor copy edits needed in HTML 5 draft (control over /TR/html5/ ) (Monday, 18 June)
Re: please reivew mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0 (Monday, 18 June)
Change in Opera representative (Monday, 18 June)
Re: mobileOK Basic, overly restrictive tests (was: Re: please reivew mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0 (scripting, fallback, ...)) (Thursday, 14 June)

Chris Adams

Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Tuesday, 19 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Tuesday, 19 June)

Chris Boudy

Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element (Monday, 11 June)

Chris Wilson

Offline until 6/25 (Wednesday, 13 June)

Craig Francis

Re: About dropping the style attribute (Tuesday, 26 June)
Re: usefulness of longdesc & digitization of books & historical works [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Sunday, 24 June)
Re: danger of null value for summary attribute [Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Sunday, 24 June)
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) (Sunday, 24 June)
Re: About dropping the style attribute (Sunday, 24 June)
Re: About dropping the style attribute (Saturday, 23 June)
Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) (Saturday, 23 June)
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) (Saturday, 23 June)
Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) (Saturday, 23 June)
Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) (Saturday, 23 June)
Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) (Saturday, 23 June)
Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) (Saturday, 23 June)
Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) (Saturday, 23 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Saturday, 23 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Tuesday, 19 June)

Dan Connolly

Re: some thoughts on objections to publishing ""HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" (Friday, 29 June)
Re: Un-subscribe from public-html without leaving HTMLWG? (Friday, 29 June)
some thoughts on objections to publishing ""HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" (Friday, 29 June)
SURVEY: Re: HTML WG | Potential West Coast Face to Face? (Thursday, 28 June)
Re: SURVEY: Release "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" as a W3C Working Draft? formal decision (Wednesday, 27 June)
SURVEY: Release "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" as a W3C Working Draft? formal decision (Tuesday, 26 June)
Re: addition or subtrraction? [was Re: dropping longdesc attribute] (Tuesday, 26 June)
Re: addition or subtrraction? [was Re: dropping longdesc attribute] (Monday, 25 June)
Re: addition or subtrraction? [was Re: dropping longdesc attribute] (Monday, 25 June)
Re: addition or subtrraction? [was Re: dropping longdesc attribute] (Monday, 25 June)
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) (Monday, 25 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Monday, 25 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Monday, 25 June)
Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? (Monday, 25 June)
Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? (Monday, 25 June)
Re: Issues list for HTML WG Re: dropping longdesc attribute (Monday, 25 June)
Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? (comments mailing list) (Monday, 25 June)
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Monday, 25 June)
Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? (Monday, 25 June)
Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? (Sunday, 24 June)
ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? (Saturday, 23 June)
relevance of diverse HTML authoring practices [was: Versioning re-visited ...] (Saturday, 23 June)
Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) (Friday, 22 June)
Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. (Tuesday, 19 June)
wiki gardening around versioning/doctypes issue (Tuesday, 19 June)
Re: minor copy edits needed in HTML 5 draft (control over /TR/html5/ ) (Tuesday, 19 June)
Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. (Monday, 18 June)
feed for HTML WG current events? [was: Introducing myself] (Monday, 18 June)
Re: wiki HTMLTableAccessibility content restored (Monday, 18 June)
Re: Introducing myself (Monday, 18 June)
Re: minor copy edits needed in HTML 5 draft (control over /TR/html5/ ) (Monday, 18 June)
Re: HTML WG | Potential West Coast Face to Face? (Friday, 15 June)
Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. (Friday, 15 June)
Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. (Friday, 15 June)
Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. (Thursday, 14 June)
Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. (Thursday, 14 June)
Re: volunteers to review a few sections of the HTML 5 spec in detail? (Thursday, 14 June)
mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. (Thursday, 14 June)
Re: please reivew mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0 (Thursday, 14 June)
Re: HTML 5 and conformance checkers (Thursday, 14 June)
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2) (Thursday, 14 June)
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (Wednesday, 13 June)
Re: please reivew mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0 (scripting, fallback, ...) (Wednesday, 13 June)
Re: please reivew mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0 (Wednesday, 13 June)
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2) (Wednesday, 13 June)
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (Wednesday, 13 June)
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (Wednesday, 13 June)
Re: Reminder: "What should we publish first?" survey closes today 2007-06-08 (Friday, 8 June)
Re: volunteers to review a few sections of the HTML 5 spec in detail? (Friday, 8 June)
please reivew mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0 (Thursday, 7 June)
volunteers to review a few sections of the HTML 5 spec in detail? (Thursday, 7 June)
HTML WG office hours tomorrow (no teleconference) (Wednesday, 6 June)
Re: Raising issues in a way that the editors will pay attention to them (Saturday, 2 June)
toward W3C Working Draft: design principles? spec? other? (survey) (Saturday, 2 June)

Daniel Glazman

Re: About dropping the style attribute (Wednesday, 27 June)
Re: About dropping the style attribute (Wednesday, 27 June)
Re: Why XHTML 5 is a bad name... (Wednesday, 27 June)
Re: About dropping the style attribute (Tuesday, 26 June)

Daniel Schattenkirchner

Re: html 5 and accessibility issue (Saturday, 30 June)

Dannii

Wiki page for style attribute (Saturday, 30 June)
Re: About dropping the style attribute (Wednesday, 27 June)
Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) (Saturday, 23 June)
Re: 'role' should be property (Monday, 4 June)

Dave Singer

Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened (Thursday, 28 June)

David Choi

Re: Why the style attribute shouldn't be abandoned (Saturday, 30 June)

David Håsäther

Re: HTML 5 removed "numeric character reference" term - why? (Friday, 22 June)
Re: HTML 5 removed "numeric character reference" term - why? (Friday, 22 June)

David Poehlman

Re: the fallicy of the term "fallback content" (Monday, 25 June)
Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element (Sunday, 10 June)

Debi Orton

Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. (Thursday, 14 June)

Denis Boudreau (WebConforme)

Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Tuesday, 26 June)

DESCHAMPS Stephane ROSI/SI CLIENT

RE: dropping longdesc attribute (Tuesday, 26 June)

Diego La Monica (IWA/HWG)

Some issues [was: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"?] (Sunday, 24 June)

Dimitri Glazkov

Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) (Saturday, 23 June)
On dictature of a language, was: requiring alt attribute, was: fear of "invisible metadata" (Friday, 22 June)
Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) (Friday, 22 June)
Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) (Friday, 22 June)

Dmitry Turin

Re: Horizontal menu-2 (Monday, 11 June)
Re[2]: eleding, sag, seribute (Monday, 11 June)
Re: <code type="..."> (Monday, 11 June)
Re: 'role' should be property (Friday, 15 June)
Re: Horizontal menu-2 (Monday, 11 June)
Re: 'role' should be property (Monday, 11 June)
Re[2]: WF2, abolish <button type=remove> (Monday, 11 June)
Re: 'role' should be property (Monday, 11 June)
Re: WF2, attach hidden xml (Monday, 11 June)

Don Raikes

RE: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Wednesday, 27 June)

Doug Schepers

Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Tuesday, 26 June)
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Tuesday, 26 June)

Dylan Smith

Re: Why XHTML 5 is a bad name... (Tuesday, 26 June)

Dão Gottwald

Re: Scoped style element questions Re: Unscoped <style> found outside the <head> (Monday, 4 June)

Eric Eggert

Re: dropping longdesc attribute (Monday, 25 June)

Evans, Donald

RE: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Friday, 29 June)

Gavin Pearce

RE: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened (Thursday, 28 June)

GenSephyr

Extensions to the <base> element (Monday, 4 June)

Geoffrey Sneddon

Re: html 5 and accessibility issue (Saturday, 30 June)
Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki (Saturday, 30 June)
Re: relevance of diverse HTML authoring practices [was: Versioning re-visited ...] (Sunday, 24 June)
Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. (Tuesday, 19 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Tuesday, 19 June)
Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. (Friday, 15 June)
Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. (Thursday, 14 June)

Gijs Kruitbosch

Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Tuesday, 26 June)

gonchuki

Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (Friday, 29 June)
Re: Summary: Naming Issue, Proposals (Thursday, 28 June)
Re: About dropping the style attribute (Wednesday, 27 June)
Re: About dropping the style attribute (Wednesday, 27 June)
Re: About dropping the style attribute (Wednesday, 27 June)
Re: About dropping the style attribute (Tuesday, 26 June)
Re: About dropping the style attribute (Tuesday, 26 June)
Re: About dropping the style attribute (Monday, 25 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Monday, 25 June)
Re: what must be done to expose longdesc? [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Monday, 25 June)

Gregory J. Rosmaita

LONGDESC Wiki Page (Saturday, 30 June)
Re: Summary: Naming Issue, Proposals (Thursday, 28 June)
Re: PWDs do NOT crave catering, but EQUAL access (Thursday, 28 June)
PWDs do NOT crave catering, but EQUAL access [was: Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listen] (Thursday, 28 June)
Re: Summary: Naming Issue, Proposals (Thursday, 28 June)
sharing the burden: authors and authoring tools (Monday, 25 June)
addition or subtrraction? [was Re: dropping longdesc attribute] (Monday, 25 June)
the fallicy of the term "fallback content" (Monday, 25 June)
Re: Issues list for HTML WG (Monday, 25 June)
Re: danger of null value for summary attribute [Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Monday, 25 June)
usefulness of longdesc & digitization of books & historical works [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Sunday, 24 June)
the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Sunday, 24 June)
Re: [A11y] requiring alt Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Sunday, 24 June)
what must be done to expose longdesc? [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Sunday, 24 June)
danger of null value for summary attribute [Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Sunday, 24 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" [was Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element] (Sunday, 24 June)
rationale for preserving longdesc in HTMLx [Re: dropping longdesc attribute] (Sunday, 24 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Sunday, 24 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Monday, 18 June)
fear of "invisible metadata" [was Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element] (Monday, 18 June)
Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element (Wednesday, 13 June)
Subj: Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element (Wednesday, 13 June)
Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element (Monday, 11 June)
retention of summary attribute for TABLE element (Sunday, 10 June)
open source screen readers [was: Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute)] (Thursday, 7 June)
wiki HTMLTableAccessibility content restored (Tuesday, 5 June)
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) (Tuesday, 5 June)

Henri Sivonen

Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki (Saturday, 30 June)
Re: some thoughts on objections to publishing ""HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" (Friday, 29 June)
HTML5 and AT integration (was: Re: Summary: Naming Issue, Proposals) (Thursday, 28 June)
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Thursday, 28 June)
Re: About dropping the style attribute (Thursday, 28 June)
Re: Is there an existing FAQ for public-html? (Wednesday, 27 June)
Re: SURVEY: Release "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" as a W3C Working Draft? formal decision (Wednesday, 27 June)
Re: SURVEY: Release "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" as a W3C Working Draft? formal decision (Wednesday, 27 June)
Re: Author-friendlier definition of <object> (was Re: fear of "invisible metadata") (Wednesday, 27 June)
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Wednesday, 27 June)
Re: About dropping the style attribute (Tuesday, 26 June)
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Tuesday, 26 June)
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Tuesday, 26 June)
Re: About dropping the style attribute (Monday, 25 June)
Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) (Monday, 25 June)
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Monday, 25 June)
UA requirements vs. document conformance (Was: Re: Choosing name for XML serialization) (Monday, 25 June)
Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. (Tuesday, 19 June)
Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. (Tuesday, 19 June)
Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. (Tuesday, 19 June)
Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. (Tuesday, 19 June)
Seeking test data with bogus byte sequences (Tuesday, 19 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" [was Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element] (Tuesday, 19 June)
Re: please reivew mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0 (Monday, 18 June)
Re: HTML5 Differences from HTML4 (Friday, 15 June)
Re: What is a "state"? (Friday, 15 June)
Re: HTML 5 and conformance checkers (Thursday, 14 June)
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (Thursday, 14 June)
Re: HTML 5 and conformance checkers (Thursday, 14 June)
Re: Common pool of examples and validation (Wednesday, 13 June)
Re: Conceptual modelling of attributes (Monday, 11 June)
Re: please reivew mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0 (Monday, 11 June)
Re: 'role' should be property (Wednesday, 6 June)
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) (Sunday, 3 June)
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) (Sunday, 3 June)

Henrik Dvergsdal

Re: What is a "state"? (Friday, 15 June)
Re: What is a "state"? (Thursday, 14 June)
Re: What is a "state"? (Wednesday, 13 June)
Re: What is a "state"? (Wednesday, 13 June)
Re: What is a "state"? (Wednesday, 13 June)
Re: What is a "state"? (Tuesday, 12 June)
What is a "state"? (Tuesday, 12 June)
Re: Note on terminology: Attribute types (Tuesday, 12 June)
Note on terminology: Attribute types (Tuesday, 12 June)
Re: Conceptual modelling of attributes (Monday, 11 June)
Conceptual modelling of attributes (Monday, 11 June)
Re: volunteers to review a few sections of the HTML 5 spec in detail? (Friday, 8 June)
Re: volunteers to review a few sections of the HTML 5 spec in detail? (Friday, 8 June)
Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? (Wednesday, 6 June)
Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? (Wednesday, 6 June)
Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? (Wednesday, 6 June)
Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? (Tuesday, 5 June)
Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? (Tuesday, 5 June)
Re: Raising issues in a way that the editors will pay attention to them (Monday, 4 June)
Re: toward W3C Working Draft: design principles? spec? other? (survey) (Monday, 4 June)
Re: toward W3C Working Draft: design principles? spec? other? (survey) (Monday, 4 June)
Re: toward W3C Working Draft: design principles? spec? other? (survey) (Monday, 4 June)
Re: toward W3C Working Draft: design principles? spec? other? (survey) (Monday, 4 June)
Re: Raising issues in a way that the editors will pay attention to them (Monday, 4 June)
Re: toward W3C Working Draft: design principles? spec? other? (survey) (Monday, 4 June)
Re: toward W3C Working Draft: design principles? spec? other? (survey) (Monday, 4 June)
Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? (Monday, 4 June)
Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? (Monday, 4 June)
Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? (Sunday, 3 June)

Håkon Wium Lie

Re: About dropping the style attribute (Sunday, 24 June)

Ian Hickson

Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki (Saturday, 30 June)
Re: LONGDESC Wiki Page (Saturday, 30 June)
Re: some thoughts on objections to publishing ""HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" (Friday, 29 June)
Re: some thoughts on objections to publishing ""HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" (Friday, 29 June)
Re: Dates in HTML 5 (Thursday, 28 June)
Re: How to productively contribute (Thursday, 28 June)
Re: How to productively contribute (Wednesday, 27 June)
Re: How to productively contribute (Wednesday, 27 June)
Re: Dates in HTML 5 (Wednesday, 27 June)
How to productively contribute (Tuesday, 26 June)
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) (Monday, 25 June)
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) (Monday, 25 June)
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) (Monday, 25 June)
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Monday, 25 June)
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Monday, 25 June)
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) (Monday, 25 June)
Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) (Monday, 25 June)
Re: Issues list for HTML WG Re: dropping longdesc attribute (Monday, 25 June)
Re: dropping longdesc attribute (Saturday, 23 June)
Re: #refs in .../current-work/multipage/ (Friday, 22 June)
Re: Attributes and "Expandos" (Friday, 22 June)
Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) (Friday, 22 June)
Re: HTML 5 removed "numeric character reference" term - why? (Friday, 22 June)
Re: C0 control characters in HTML 5 (Friday, 22 June)
Re: HTML 5 removed "numeric character reference" term - why? (Friday, 22 June)
Re: C0 control characters in HTML 5 (Friday, 22 June)
Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) (Friday, 22 June)
Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) (Thursday, 21 June)
Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) (Thursday, 21 June)
Re: minor copy edits needed in HTML 5 draft (control over /TR/html5/ ) (Wednesday, 20 June)
Re: Parsing of HTML fragments (Wednesday, 20 June)
Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. (Tuesday, 19 June)
Re: Scope and obsolescence of other specs (was Re: minor copy edits...) (Monday, 18 June)
Re: minor copy edits needed in HTML 5 draft (control over /TR/html5/ ) (Monday, 18 June)
Re: minor copy edits needed in HTML 5 draft (control over /TR/html5/ ) (Monday, 18 June)
Re: minor copy edits needed in HTML 5 draft (control over /TR/html5/ ) (Monday, 18 June)
Re: minor copy edits needed in HTML 5 draft (Monday, 18 June)
Re: Allow other doctypes (Sunday, 17 June)
Re: Allow other doctypes (Sunday, 17 June)
Re: minor copy edits needed in HTML 5 draft (Sunday, 17 June)
Re: Allow other doctypes (Sunday, 17 June)
Re: What is a "state"? (Thursday, 14 June)
Re: What is a "state"? (Wednesday, 13 June)
Re: What is a "state"? (Wednesday, 13 June)
Re: What is a "state"? (Wednesday, 13 June)
Re: What is a "state"? (Tuesday, 12 June)
Re: What is a "state"? (Tuesday, 12 June)
Re: Conceptual modelling of attributes (and Note on terminology: Attribute types) (Tuesday, 12 June)
"Headers Attribute" issue (Thursday, 7 June)
Re: headers attribute (Monday, 4 June)
Re: Raising issues in a way that the editors will pay attention to them (Monday, 4 June)
Re: Raising issues in a way that the editors will pay attention to them (Saturday, 2 June)
Raising issues in a way that the editors will pay attention to them (Friday, 1 June)

James Craig

Re: About dropping the style attribute (Tuesday, 26 June)

James Graham

Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Friday, 29 June)
Re: usefulness of longdesc & digitization of books & historical works [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Monday, 25 June)
Re: danger of null value for summary attribute [Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Monday, 25 June)
Re: More on <CAPTION> element etc (Thursday, 21 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Tuesday, 19 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" [was Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element] (Monday, 18 June)
Re: Subj: Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element (Wednesday, 13 June)
Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element (Monday, 11 June)
Re: Raising issues in a way that the editors will pay attention to them (Monday, 4 June)

Jason White

Re: what must be done to expose longdesc? [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Friday, 29 June)

Jeff Schiller

Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) (Monday, 25 June)
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) (Monday, 25 June)
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) (Monday, 25 June)
Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? (Sunday, 24 June)
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) (Saturday, 23 June)

Jens Meiert

[html] HTML elements index (Saturday, 30 June)
Re: About dropping the style attribute (Wednesday, 27 June)
Re: About dropping the style attribute (Wednesday, 27 June)
Re: About dropping the style attribute (Tuesday, 26 June)
Re: About dropping the style attribute (Tuesday, 26 June)
Re: About dropping the style attribute (Tuesday, 26 June)
Re: About dropping the style attribute (Tuesday, 26 June)
Re: [doctype] useless/not required or useful/required (Friday, 15 June)
Re: [doctype] useless/not required or useful/required (Friday, 15 June)
Re: [doctype] useless/not required or useful/required (Friday, 15 June)

Jirka Kosek

Re: Summary: Naming Issue, Proposals (Thursday, 28 June)
Re: SURVEY: Release "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" as a W3C Working Draft? formal decision (Tuesday, 26 June)
Re: HTML Design Principles to WD? (Tuesday, 26 June)
Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. (Tuesday, 26 June)
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) (Friday, 22 June)
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) (Friday, 22 June)
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) (Friday, 22 June)
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) (Friday, 22 June)
Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) (Thursday, 21 June)
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) (Thursday, 21 June)
Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) (Thursday, 21 June)
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2) (Friday, 15 June)
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2) (Thursday, 14 June)
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (Wednesday, 13 June)

Jo Rabin

RE: mobileOK Basic, overly restrictive tests (was: Re: please reivew mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0 (scripting, fallback, ...)) (Thursday, 14 June)
RE: please reivew mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0 (Thursday, 14 June)
RE: please reivew mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0 (scripting, fallback, ...) (Thursday, 14 June)
RE: please reivew mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0 (Monday, 11 June)

Johannes Lichtenberger

Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (Sunday, 24 June)
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (Sunday, 24 June)

John Foliot

RE: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Monday, 25 June)
Re: Introducing myself (Monday, 18 June)

John Foliot - Stanford Online Accessibility Program

RE: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Tuesday, 26 June)

Jon Barnett

Re: About dropping the style attribute (Wednesday, 27 June)
Re: About dropping the style attribute (Monday, 25 June)
Re: 'role' should be property (Friday, 1 June)
Re: 'role' should be property (Friday, 1 June)

Jon Gunderson

Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Friday, 29 June)

Jonas Sicking

Re: Moving forward? (issue tracking, spec review, shaping email discussions) (Saturday, 2 June)

Josh Sled

Re: HTML Design Principles to WD? (Wednesday, 27 June)
#refs in .../current-work/multipage/ (Friday, 22 June)
Re: <code type="..."> (Friday, 22 June)
Re: <code type="..."> (Thursday, 21 June)
Re: <code type="..."> (Thursday, 21 June)

Joshue O Connor

Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki (Saturday, 30 June)
Re: some thoughts on objections to publishing ""HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" (Friday, 29 June)
Re: dropping longdesc attribute (Friday, 29 June)
Re: danger of null value for summary attribute [Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Friday, 29 June)
Re: what must be done to expose longdesc? [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Friday, 29 June)
Re: rationale for preserving longdesc in HTMLx [Re: dropping longdesc attribute] (Friday, 29 June)
Re: rationale for preserving longdesc in HTMLx [Re: dropping longdesc attribute] (Friday, 29 June)
Re: usefulness of longdesc & digitization of books & historical works [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Friday, 29 June)
Re: what must be done to expose longdesc? [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Friday, 29 June)
Re: [A11y] Using Longdesc, will it fly? (Friday, 29 June)
Re: More on <CAPTION> element etc (Friday, 22 June)
Re: More on <CAPTION> element etc (Friday, 22 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Friday, 22 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Friday, 22 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Friday, 22 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Thursday, 21 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" [was Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element] (Thursday, 21 June)
Re: [a11y] Requiring alt Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Thursday, 21 June)
Re: [a11y] Requiring alt Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Thursday, 21 June)
Re: More on <CAPTION> element etc (Thursday, 21 June)
Re: [Spam] Re: More on <CAPTION> element etc (Thursday, 21 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Thursday, 21 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" [was Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element] (Thursday, 21 June)
More on <CAPTION> element etc (Thursday, 21 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" [was Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element] (Tuesday, 19 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" [was Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element] (Tuesday, 19 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Tuesday, 19 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Tuesday, 19 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" [was Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element] (Monday, 18 June)
[Fwd: Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Monday, 18 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Monday, 18 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Monday, 18 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Monday, 18 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" [was Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element] (Monday, 18 June)
Re: <tfoot> at the bottom of <table> (Sunday, 17 June)
Re:retention of summary attribute for TABLE element (with addendum on id/headers) (Thursday, 14 June)
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (Wednesday, 13 June)
Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element (Wednesday, 13 June)

Julian Reschke

Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Monday, 25 June)
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) (Monday, 25 June)
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) (Monday, 25 June)
Re: About dropping the style attribute (Sunday, 24 June)
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Thursday, 21 June)
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) (Thursday, 21 June)

Karl Dubost

Re: Dates in HTML 5 (Friday, 29 June)
coordinating with WAI (Thursday, 28 June)
Re: SURVEY: Release "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" as a W3C Working Draft? formal decision (Thursday, 28 June)
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (Wednesday, 27 June)
Re: Is there an existing FAQ for public-html? (Wednesday, 27 June)
Re: About dropping the style attribute (Wednesday, 27 June)
Re: Proposal: accessibility revision for the img element... (Wednesday, 27 June)
Re: Why XHTML 5 is a bad name... (Wednesday, 27 June)
Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. (Wednesday, 27 June)
Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. (Tuesday, 26 June)
Re: dropping longdesc attribute (Tuesday, 26 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Tuesday, 26 June)
Re: relevance of diverse HTML authoring practices [was: Versioning re-visited ...] (Tuesday, 26 June)
BarCamp like for the HTML WG. (Tuesday, 26 June)
Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? (Monday, 25 June)
Issues list for HTML WG Re: dropping longdesc attribute (Monday, 25 June)
Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? (Monday, 25 June)
Re: relevance of diverse HTML authoring practices [was: Versioning re-visited ...] (Monday, 25 June)
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) (Friday, 22 June)
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) (Friday, 22 June)
Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) (Friday, 22 June)
Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) (Friday, 22 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Thursday, 21 June)
Re: feed for HTML WG current events? [was: Introducing myself] (Wednesday, 20 June)
Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. (Tuesday, 19 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" [was Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element] (Tuesday, 19 June)
Re: feed for HTML WG current events? [was: Introducing myself] (Monday, 18 June)
Renaming "writing HTML 8.1" - Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. (Monday, 18 June)
[doctype] useless/not required or useful/required (Friday, 15 June)
Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. (Friday, 15 June)
Re: HTML 5 and conformance checkers (Thursday, 14 June)
HTML 5 and conformance checkers (Thursday, 14 June)
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (Thursday, 14 June)
Re: Conceptual modelling of attributes (Tuesday, 12 June)
Re: Raising issues in a way that the editors will pay attention to them (Thursday, 7 June)
Re: [Fwd: Re: toward W3C Working Draft: design principles? spec? other? (survey)] (Tuesday, 5 June)
Re: Raising issues in a way that the editors will pay attention to them (Monday, 4 June)
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) (Monday, 4 June)

Kornel Lesinski

Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? (Sunday, 24 June)
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) (Sunday, 24 June)
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) (Sunday, 24 June)

L. David Baron

Re: Common pool of examples and validation (Wednesday, 13 June)

Lachlan Hunt

Re: html 5 and accessibility issue (Saturday, 30 June)
Re: html 5 and accessibility issue (Saturday, 30 June)
Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki (Saturday, 30 June)
Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki (Saturday, 30 June)
Re: Why the style attribute shouldn't be abandoned (Saturday, 30 June)
Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki (Saturday, 30 June)
Re: some thoughts on objections to publishing ""HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" (Friday, 29 June)
Re: Video Descriptions (Thursday, 28 June)
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened (Thursday, 28 June)
Re: Why XHTML 5 is a bad name... (Thursday, 28 June)
Re: Author-friendlier definition of <object> (Wednesday, 27 June)
Re: SURVEY: Release "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" as a W3C Working Draft? formal decision (Wednesday, 27 June)
Re: Why XHTML 5 is a bad name... (Wednesday, 27 June)
Re: Author-friendlier definition of <object> (was Re: fear of "invisible metadata") (Tuesday, 26 June)
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened (Tuesday, 26 June)
Re: HTML Design Principles to WD? (Tuesday, 26 June)
Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. (Tuesday, 26 June)
Re: "placeholder link" (Monday, 25 June)
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Monday, 25 June)
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Monday, 25 June)
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Monday, 25 June)
Re: "placeholder link" (Sunday, 24 June)
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (Sunday, 24 June)
Re: dropping longdesc attribute (Saturday, 23 June)
Re: dropping longdesc attribute (Saturday, 23 June)
Re: HTML 5 removed "numeric character reference" term - why? (Friday, 22 June)
Re: dropping longdesc attribute (Friday, 22 June)
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Thursday, 21 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Tuesday, 19 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Monday, 18 June)
Re: Allow other doctypes (Sunday, 17 June)
Re: toward W3C Working Draft: design principles? spec? other? (survey) (Saturday, 2 June)

Laura Carlson

Re: How to productively contribute (Thursday, 28 June)
Re: HTML Design Principles to WD? (Wednesday, 27 June)
Re: HTML Design Principles to WD? (Tuesday, 26 June)
Re: Author-friendlier definition of <object> (was Re: fear of "invisible metadata") (Tuesday, 26 June)
Re: addition or subtrraction? [was Re: dropping longdesc attribute] (Tuesday, 26 June)
Re: addition or subtrraction? [was Re: dropping longdesc attribute] (Monday, 25 June)
Re: [A11y] requiring alt Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Monday, 25 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Friday, 22 June)
Re: [a11y] Requiring alt Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Thursday, 21 June)
Re: [a11y] Requiring alt Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Thursday, 21 June)
Re: [a11y] Requiring alt Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Thursday, 21 June)
dropping longdesc attribute (Thursday, 21 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Thursday, 21 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Monday, 18 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Monday, 18 June)
Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element (Wednesday, 13 June)
Reminder: "What should we publish first?" survey closes today 2007-06-08 (Friday, 8 June)
Re: volunteers to review a few sections of the HTML 5 spec in detail? (Friday, 8 June)
Re: "Headers Attribute" issue (Thursday, 7 June)
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) (Wednesday, 6 June)
Re: headers attribute (was Re: Form elements) (Wednesday, 6 June)
Re: Raising issues in a way that the editors will pay attention to them (Wednesday, 6 June)
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) (Wednesday, 6 June)
Re: Complex Table Examples (Tuesday, 5 June)
Re: headers attribute (was Re: Form elements) (Monday, 4 June)
Re: headers attribute (was Re: Form elements) (Saturday, 2 June)
Re: Complex Table Examples (Friday, 1 June)
Re: Complex Table Examples (Friday, 1 June)
Re: Complex Table Examples (Friday, 1 June)

Laurens Holst

Re: please reivew mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0 (Monday, 18 June)
Re: please reivew mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0 (Wednesday, 13 June)
Re: please reivew mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0 (Monday, 11 June)
Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? (Friday, 8 June)
Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? (Friday, 8 June)
Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? (Friday, 8 June)
Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? (Friday, 8 June)
Re: Raising issues in a way that the editors will pay attention to them (Thursday, 7 June)
Re: please reivew mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0 (Thursday, 7 June)
Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? (Thursday, 7 June)
Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? (Wednesday, 6 June)
Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? (Tuesday, 5 June)
Re: Do we need the restrictions on the <base> element? (Monday, 4 June)

Lee Kowalkowski

Re: dialog vs. dialogue (dl) (Friday, 15 June)

Leif Halvard Silli

Re: Reminder: "What should we publish first?" survey closes today 2007-06-08 (Friday, 8 June)
Re: Complex Table Examples (Tuesday, 5 June)
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) (Tuesday, 5 June)
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) (Monday, 4 June)
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) (Monday, 4 June)
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) (Monday, 4 June)
Re: headers attribute (was Re: Form elements) (Monday, 4 June)
Re: headers attribute (Sunday, 3 June)
Re: headers attribute (was Re: Form elements) (Saturday, 2 June)
Re: headers attribute (was Re: Form elements) (Saturday, 2 June)
Re: headers attribute (Saturday, 2 June)
Re: headers attribute (Saturday, 2 June)
Re: headers attribute (was Re: Form elements) (Friday, 1 June)
Re: headers attribute (was Re: Form elements) (Friday, 1 June)
Re: 'role' should be property (Friday, 1 June)

liorean

Re: Dates in HTML 5 (Thursday, 28 June)
Re: Dates in HTML 5 (Thursday, 28 June)
Re: Dates in HTML 5 (Thursday, 28 June)
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) (Sunday, 24 June)
Re: <code type="..."> (Thursday, 21 June)
Re: [whatwg] Setting innerHTML to null or undefined (Tuesday, 5 June)
Re: [whatwg] Setting innerHTML to null or undefined (Tuesday, 5 June)
Re: [whatwg] Setting innerHTML to null or undefined (Tuesday, 5 June)
Re: Scoped style element questions Re: Unscoped <style> found outside the <head> (Monday, 4 June)
Re: Scoped style element questions Re: Unscoped <style> found outside the <head> (Monday, 4 June)
Re: Scoped style element questions Re: Unscoped <style> found outside the <head> (Saturday, 2 June)
Re: Some DOM related comments (Saturday, 2 June)
Some DOM related comments (Saturday, 2 June)

Maciej Stachowiak

Re: some thoughts on objections to publishing ""HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" (Friday, 29 June)
Re: some thoughts on objections to publishing ""HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" (Friday, 29 June)
Re: Why XHTML 5 is a bad name... (Wednesday, 27 June)
Re: HTML Design Principles to WD? (Tuesday, 26 June)
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Tuesday, 26 June)
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Tuesday, 26 June)
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Tuesday, 26 June)
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Tuesday, 26 June)
Re: [A11y] requiring alt Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Monday, 25 June)
Re: relevance of diverse HTML authoring practices [was: Versioning re-visited ...] (Monday, 25 June)
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) (Monday, 25 June)
Re: relevance of diverse HTML authoring practices [was: Versioning re-visited ...] (Sunday, 24 June)
Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? (Sunday, 24 June)
Re: About dropping the style attribute (Sunday, 24 June)
Re: Attributes and "Expandos" (Friday, 22 June)
Re: Attributes and "Expandos" (Friday, 22 June)
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) (Friday, 22 June)
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) (Friday, 22 June)
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) (Friday, 22 June)
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) (Friday, 22 June)
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) (Friday, 22 June)
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) (Friday, 22 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Thursday, 21 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Thursday, 21 June)
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) (Thursday, 21 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Thursday, 21 June)
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) (Thursday, 21 June)
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) (Thursday, 21 June)
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) (Thursday, 21 June)
Re: [A11y] requiring alt Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Tuesday, 19 June)
Re: [A11y] requiring alt Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Tuesday, 19 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Tuesday, 19 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Tuesday, 19 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Tuesday, 19 June)
Re: Allow other doctypes (Sunday, 17 June)
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2) (Friday, 15 June)
Re: Note on terminology: Attribute types (Tuesday, 12 June)
Re: please reivew mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0 (Monday, 11 June)
Re: [whatwg] Setting innerHTML to null or undefined (Tuesday, 5 June)
Re: [whatwg] Setting innerHTML to null or undefined (Tuesday, 5 June)
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) (Monday, 4 June)
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) (Monday, 4 June)
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) (Sunday, 3 June)
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) (Sunday, 3 June)
Re: headers attribute (was Re: Form elements) (Saturday, 2 June)
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) (Saturday, 2 June)
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) (Saturday, 2 June)
Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) (Saturday, 2 June)

Marco Neumann

3.14.13. The area element (Monday, 25 June)

Mark Birbeck

Martijn

Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Thursday, 28 June)
Re: Issues list for HTML WG Re: dropping longdesc attribute (Monday, 25 June)
Re: Issues list for HTML WG Re: dropping longdesc attribute (Monday, 25 June)
Re: Issues list for HTML WG Re: dropping longdesc attribute (Monday, 25 June)
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) (Monday, 25 June)
Re: Issues list for HTML WG Re: dropping longdesc attribute (Monday, 25 June)
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (Sunday, 24 June)
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (Wednesday, 13 June)
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (Wednesday, 13 June)

Martin Duerst

Re: Seeking test data with bogus byte sequences from Henri Sivonen on 2007-06-19 (public-html@w3.org from June 2007) (Sunday, 24 June)

Martyn Haigh

Introducing myself (Monday, 18 June)
RE: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (Thursday, 14 June)

Matthew Raymond

Re: 'role' should be property (Thursday, 7 June)
Re: 'role' should be property (Wednesday, 6 June)
Re: 'role' should be property (Monday, 4 June)
Re: 'role' should be property (Monday, 4 June)

Maurice Carey

Re: About dropping the style attribute (Thursday, 28 June)
Re: [A11y] requiring alt Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Monday, 25 June)
Re: rationale for preserving longdesc in HTMLx [Re: dropping longdesc attribute] (Monday, 25 June)
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (Monday, 25 June)
Re: About dropping the style attribute (Monday, 25 June)
Re: About dropping the style attribute (Monday, 25 June)
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) (Monday, 25 June)
Re: About dropping the style attribute (Monday, 25 June)
Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) (Monday, 25 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Monday, 25 June)
Re: dropping longdesc attribute (Monday, 25 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Monday, 25 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Monday, 25 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Friday, 22 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Friday, 22 June)
Re: <code type="..."> (Friday, 22 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" [was Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element] (Thursday, 21 June)
Re: <code type="..."> (Thursday, 21 June)
Re: [Spam] Re: More on <CAPTION> element etc (Thursday, 21 June)
Re: Horizontal menu-2 (Thursday, 21 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" [was Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element] (Thursday, 21 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" [was Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element] (Thursday, 21 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Thursday, 21 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Thursday, 21 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Thursday, 21 June)
Re: HTML5 Differences from HTML4 (Monday, 18 June)
Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. (Monday, 18 June)
Re: Subj: Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element (Monday, 18 June)
HTML5 Differences from HTML4 (Friday, 15 June)
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) (Wednesday, 6 June)

Michael A. Puls II

Re: Why the style attribute shouldn't be abandoned (Saturday, 30 June)
Re: Why XHTML 5 is a bad name... (Wednesday, 27 June)
Re: minor copy edits needed in HTML 5 draft (control over /TR/html5/ ) (Monday, 18 June)
Re: minor copy edits needed in HTML 5 draft (control over /TR/html5/ ) (Monday, 18 June)
Re: Allow other doctypes (Monday, 18 June)
Re: Allow other doctypes (Sunday, 17 June)
Re: [doctype] useless/not required or useful/required (Friday, 15 June)
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (Thursday, 14 June)
Re: Note on terminology: Attribute types (Wednesday, 13 June)

michael lawley

Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? (Tuesday, 26 June)

Mike Brown

Re: HTML 5 removed "numeric character reference" term - why? (Saturday, 23 June)
Re: HTML 5 removed "numeric character reference" term - why? (Friday, 22 June)
Re: HTML 5 removed "numeric character reference" term - why? (Friday, 22 June)
Re: C0 control characters in HTML 5 (Friday, 22 June)
Re: minor copy edits needed in HTML 5 draft (control over /TR/html5/ ) (Monday, 18 June)
HTML 5 removed "numeric character reference" term - why? (Monday, 18 June)
C0 control characters in HTML 5 (Monday, 18 June)
Scope and obsolescence of other specs (was Re: minor copy edits...) (Monday, 18 June)
Re: minor copy edits needed in HTML 5 draft (Monday, 18 June)
The term "HTML elements" (Sunday, 17 June)
The term "HTML documents" (Sunday, 17 June)
minor copy edits needed in HTML 5 draft (Sunday, 17 June)

Monika Trebo

Re: difference between @alt and @title [was RE: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Tuesday, 26 June)
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Tuesday, 26 June)
Re: dropping longdesc attribute (Friday, 22 June)

Murray Maloney

Re: Summary: Naming Issue, Proposals (Thursday, 28 June)

Nathan Youngman

Re: Un-subscribe from public-html without leaving HTMLWG? (Friday, 29 June)
Re: dialog vs. dialogue (dl) (Friday, 15 June)

Nicolas LE GALL

Re: Why XHTML 5 is a bad name... (Wednesday, 27 June)

Nikola Mitic

Re: E-mail subscription and RSS (Friday, 22 June)

Olivier GENDRIN

Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (Thursday, 28 June)
Re: dropping longdesc attribute (Monday, 25 June)
Re: Proposal: accessibility revision for the img element... (Monday, 25 June)
Re: feed for HTML WG current events? [was: Introducing myself] (Wednesday, 20 June)
Re: Introducing myself (Monday, 18 June)
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (Friday, 15 June)
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (Thursday, 14 June)
Re: Scoped style element questions Re: Unscoped <style> found outside the <head> (Friday, 1 June)

Patrick Garies

Re: Why the style attribute shouldn't be abandoned (Saturday, 30 June)
Re: Un-subscribe from public-html without leaving HTMLWG? (Saturday, 30 June)
Re: Why XHTML 5 is a bad name... (Thursday, 28 June)
Re: About dropping the style attribute (Wednesday, 27 June)
Re: About dropping the style attribute (Sunday, 24 June)

paul haine

Re: Summary: Naming Issue, Proposals (Thursday, 28 June)
Re: dialog vs. dialogue (dl) (Friday, 15 June)

Peter Krantz

Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki (Saturday, 30 June)
Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki (Saturday, 30 June)
Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki (Saturday, 30 June)
LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki (Saturday, 30 June)

Philip & Le Khanh

Re: addition or subtrraction? [was Re: dropping longdesc attribute] (Monday, 25 June)
Re: relevance of diverse HTML authoring practices [was: Versioning re-visited ...] (Monday, 25 June)
Typo. correction : relevance of diverse HTML authoring practices (Sunday, 24 June)
Re: relevance of diverse HTML authoring practices [was: Versioning re-visited ...] (Saturday, 23 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Friday, 22 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Thursday, 21 June)
Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) (Thursday, 21 June)
Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) (Thursday, 21 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Thursday, 21 June)
Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) (Thursday, 21 June)
Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. (Tuesday, 19 June)
Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. (Tuesday, 19 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" [was Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element] (Monday, 18 June)
Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. (Monday, 18 June)
Re: Raising issues in a way that the editors will pay attention to them (Monday, 4 June)

Philip TAYLOR

Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki (Saturday, 30 June)
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Thursday, 28 June)
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened (Thursday, 28 June)
Re: #refs in .../current-work/multipage/ (Friday, 22 June)

Philip Taylor (Webmaster)

Re: Dates in HTML 5 (Friday, 29 June)
Re: Proposal: accessibility revision for the img element... (Tuesday, 26 June)
Re: relevance of diverse HTML authoring practices [was: Versioning re-visited ...] (Monday, 25 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Monday, 25 June)
Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) (Friday, 22 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Friday, 22 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Friday, 22 June)
Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) (Thursday, 21 June)
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) (Thursday, 21 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Monday, 18 June)
Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc. (Monday, 18 June)
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (Thursday, 14 June)

Raphael Champeimont (Almacha)

Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) (Wednesday, 27 June)
Problem in algorithm "get an attribute" of 8.2.2. The input stream (Friday, 1 June)

Rene Saarsoo

Re: Why the style attribute shouldn't be abandoned (Saturday, 30 June)
Why the style attribute shouldn't be abandoned (Friday, 29 June)

Rob Marshall

Re: Dates in HTML 5 (Wednesday, 27 June)

Robert Burns

Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki (Saturday, 30 June)
Re: html 5 and accessibility issue (Saturday, 30 June)
Re: html 5 and accessibility issue (Saturday, 30 June)
Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki (Saturday, 30 June)
Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki (Saturday, 30 June)
Re: some thoughts on objections to publishing ""HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" (Saturday, 30 June)
Re: some thoughts on objections to publishing ""HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" (Friday, 29 June)
Re: some thoughts on objections to publishing ""HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" (Friday, 29 June)
Re: some thoughts on objections to publishing ""HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" (Friday, 29 June)
Re: Dates in HTML 5 (Thursday, 28 June)
Re: How to productively contribute (Thursday, 28 June)
Re: How to productively contribute (Wednesday, 27 June)
Re: How to productively contribute (Wednesday, 27 June)
Re: Dates in HTML 5 (Wednesday, 27 June)
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Wednesday, 27 June)
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Wednesday, 27 June)
Re: SURVEY: Release "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" as a W3C Working Draft? formal decision (Wednesday, 27 June)
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened (Wednesday, 27 June)
Re: danger of null value for summary attribute [Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Wednesday, 27 June)
Re: Proposal: accessibility revision for the img element... (Wednesday, 27 June)
Re: Why XHTML 5 is a bad name... (Wednesday, 27 June)
Re: difference between @alt and @title [was RE: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Tuesday, 26 June)
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Tuesday, 26 June)
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Tuesday, 26 June)
Re: Proposal: accessibility revision for the img element... (Tuesday, 26 June)
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Tuesday, 26 June)
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Tuesday, 26 June)
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Tuesday, 26 June)
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Tuesday, 26 June)
Re: The point of XHTML 2 (Tuesday, 26 June)
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Tuesday, 26 June)
Re: danger of null value for summary attribute [Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Monday, 25 June)
Re: About dropping the style attribute (Sunday, 24 June)
Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? (Sunday, 24 June)
Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? (Sunday, 24 June)
Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? (Sunday, 24 June)
Re: figures, images and fallback content (was: fear of "invisible metadata") (Saturday, 23 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Saturday, 23 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Friday, 22 June)
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) (Thursday, 21 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Wednesday, 20 June)

Roger Johansson

Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) (Thursday, 21 June)

Sam Ruby

Re: BarCamp like for the HTML WG. (Tuesday, 26 June)
Re: About dropping the style attribute (Sunday, 24 June)
Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) (Friday, 22 June)
Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) (Friday, 22 June)
Re: feed for HTML WG current events? [was: Introducing myself] (Monday, 18 June)

Sander Tekelenburg

Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki (Saturday, 30 June)
Re: Author-friendlier definition of <object> (was Re: fear of "invisible metadata") (Thursday, 28 June)
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened (Thursday, 28 June)
Re: Author-friendlier definition of <object> (was Re: fear of "invisible metadata") (Thursday, 28 June)
Re: Author-friendlier definition of <object> (was Re: fear of "invisible metadata") (Thursday, 28 June)
Re: Author-friendlier definition of <object> (Wednesday, 27 June)
Re: danger of null value for summary attribute [Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Wednesday, 27 June)
Re: Proposal: accessibility revision for the img element... (Wednesday, 27 June)
Re: difference between @alt and @title (Wednesday, 27 June)
Re: Author-friendlier definition of <object> (was Re: fear of "invisible metadata") (Wednesday, 27 June)
Author-friendlier definition of <object> (was Re: fear of "invisible metadata") (Tuesday, 26 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Tuesday, 26 June)
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Tuesday, 26 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Tuesday, 26 June)
Re: sharing the burden: authors and authoring tools (Tuesday, 26 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Monday, 25 June)
Re: "placeholder link" (Monday, 25 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Monday, 25 June)
Re: "placeholder link" (Monday, 25 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Monday, 25 June)
Re: "placeholder link" (Monday, 25 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Monday, 25 June)
Re: Proposal: accessibility revision for the img element... (Monday, 25 June)
Re: "placeholder link" (Monday, 25 June)
Re: ready to publish "HTML5 differences from HTML4"? (Monday, 25 June)
Re: "placeholder link" (was HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft) (Sunday, 24 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Sunday, 24 June)
Re: More on <CAPTION> element etc (Friday, 22 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Friday, 22 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Friday, 22 June)
Re: More on <CAPTION> element etc (Friday, 22 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Friday, 22 June)
Re: More on <CAPTION> element etc (Friday, 22 June)
Re: More on <CAPTION> element etc (Thursday, 21 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" [was Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element] (Thursday, 21 June)
Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element (Thursday, 21 June)
Re: feed for HTML WG current events? [was: Introducing myself] (Wednesday, 20 June)
Re: feed for HTML WG current events? [was: Introducing myself] (Wednesday, 20 June)
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) (Thursday, 7 June)
Re: headers attribute (Wednesday, 6 June)
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) (Sunday, 3 June)
Re: headers attribute (Sunday, 3 June)
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) (Sunday, 3 June)
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) (Sunday, 3 June)
Re: headers attribute (Saturday, 2 June)
Re: headers attribute (was Re: Form elements) (Friday, 1 June)

Sander van Lambalgen

Re: SURVEY: Release "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" as a W3C Working Draft? formal decision (Wednesday, 27 June)

Schalk Neethling

Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (Wednesday, 13 June)
Re: volunteers to review a few sections of the HTML 5 spec in detail? (Friday, 8 June)
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) (Saturday, 2 June)

scott lewis

Re: Author-friendlier definition of <object> (was Re: fear of "invisible metadata") (Thursday, 28 June)
Re: Author-friendlier definition of <object> (was Re: fear of "invisible metadata") (Thursday, 28 June)
Is there an existing FAQ for public-html? (Wednesday, 27 June)
Re: relevance of diverse HTML authoring practices [was: Versioning re-visited ...] (Tuesday, 26 June)
Re: "placeholder link" (Monday, 25 June)
Re: relevance of diverse HTML authoring practices [was: Versioning re-visited ...] (Monday, 25 June)
Re: "placeholder link" (Monday, 25 June)
Re: Choosing name for XML serialization (Was: Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (XHTML5 and XHTML2)) (Monday, 25 June)
Re: dropping longdesc attribute (Saturday, 23 June)
Re: dropping longdesc attribute (Saturday, 23 June)
Re: dialog vs. dialogue (dl) (Friday, 15 June)

Sean Fraser

Re: Allow other doctypes (Monday, 18 June)
Re: Allow other doctypes (Sunday, 17 June)
Re: Allow other doctypes (Sunday, 17 June)

Sean Owen

Re: please reivew mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0 (Monday, 18 June)
Re: please reivew mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0 (Friday, 15 June)
Re: please reivew mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0 (Thursday, 14 June)
Re: please reivew mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0 (Wednesday, 13 June)
Re: please reivew mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0 (Wednesday, 13 June)
Re: please reivew mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0 (Wednesday, 13 June)
Re: please reivew mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0 (Sunday, 10 June)

Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer

Summary: Naming Issue, Proposals (Thursday, 28 June)
Re: Why XHTML 5 is a bad name... (Wednesday, 27 June)
Why XHTML 5 is a bad name... (Tuesday, 26 June)
Re: The point of XHTML 2 (Monday, 25 June)

Shane Thacker

Re: About dropping the style attribute (Wednesday, 27 June)

Shawn Medero

Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (Wednesday, 13 June)
Re: volunteers to review a few sections of the HTML 5 spec in detail? (Friday, 8 June)

Sierk Bornemann

Re: Un-subscribe from public-html without leaving HTMLWG? (Friday, 29 June)

Simon Grant

Dates in HTML 5 (Tuesday, 26 June)

Simon Pieters

Re: coordinating with WAI (Thursday, 28 June)
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Wednesday, 27 June)
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Wednesday, 27 June)
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Wednesday, 27 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Monday, 25 June)
Re: "placeholder link" (Monday, 25 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Monday, 25 June)
Re: "placeholder link" (Monday, 25 June)
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft (Sunday, 24 June)
Re: HTML 5 removed "numeric character reference" term - why? (Friday, 22 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" [was Re: retention of summary attribute for TABLE element] (Friday, 22 June)
Re: The term "HTML elements" (Sunday, 17 June)
mobileOK Basic, overly restrictive tests (was: Re: please reivew mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0 (scripting, fallback, ...)) (Thursday, 14 June)
Re: please reivew mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0 (Monday, 11 June)

Smylers

Re: Video Descriptions (Was: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened) (Thursday, 28 June)
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened (Wednesday, 27 June)
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Tuesday, 26 June)
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Tuesday, 26 June)
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Tuesday, 26 June)

Stephen Stewart

Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) (Thursday, 21 June)

Steve Faulkner

Re: headers attribute (was Re: Form elements) (Monday, 4 June)
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) (Sunday, 3 June)

Steven Faulkner

Re: html 5 and accessibility issue (Saturday, 30 June)
Re: some thoughts on objections to publishing ""HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" (Saturday, 30 June)
Re: some thoughts on objections to publishing ""HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" (Friday, 29 June)
Re: some thoughts on objections to publishing ""HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" (Friday, 29 June)
Re: some thoughts on objections to publishing ""HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" (Friday, 29 June)
Re: dropping longdesc attribute (Saturday, 23 June)
Re: dropping longdesc attribute (Saturday, 23 June)
Re: dropping longdesc attribute (Saturday, 23 June)
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) (Wednesday, 6 June)
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) (Tuesday, 5 June)
JAWS 6.2 "simply complex" table tests (was Re: Table accessibility ) (Monday, 4 June)
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) (Sunday, 3 June)
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) (Sunday, 3 June)
Re: Table accessibility (was Re: headers attribute) (Sunday, 3 June)

Sylvain Eliade

Re: SURVEY: Release "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" as a W3C Working Draft? formal decision (Wednesday, 27 June)
Re: SURVEY: Release "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" as a W3C Working Draft? formal decision (Wednesday, 27 June)

Thomas Broyer

Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki (Saturday, 30 June)
Re: [whatwg] XMLHttpRequest for missing file (Friday, 29 June)
Re: Dates in HTML 5 (Thursday, 28 June)
Re: Dates in HTML 5 (Thursday, 28 June)
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Thursday, 28 June)
Re: [whatwg] Entity parsing [trema/diaeresis vs umlaut] (Wednesday, 27 June)
Re: Proposal: accessibility revision for the img element... (Wednesday, 27 June)
Re: Proposal: accessibility revision for the img element... (Wednesday, 27 June)
Re: SURVEY: Release "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" as a W3C Working Draft? formal decision (Tuesday, 26 June)
Re: Nested browsing context (was: fear of "invisible metadata") (Tuesday, 26 June)
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Tuesday, 26 June)
Re: fear of "invisible metadata" (Monday, 25 June)
Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.) (Thursday, 21 June)
Re: Complex Table Examples (Wednesday, 6 June)
Re: Complex Table Examples (Tuesday, 5 June)
Re: headers attribute (Monday, 4 June)

Thomas Pike

Re: <code type="..."> (Friday, 22 June)

Timmy Jose

Re: Note on terminology: Attribute types (Tuesday, 12 June)

Timur Mehrvarz

Re: please reivew mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0 (Thursday, 14 June)

Tom Morris

Travis Leithead

Attributes and "Expandos" (Friday, 22 June)

WebConforme

Re: dropping longdesc attribute (Saturday, 23 June)

William Loughborough

Re: addition or subtrraction? [was Re: dropping longdesc attribute] (Wednesday, 27 June)
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Wednesday, 27 June)
Re: usefulness of longdesc & digitization of books & historical works [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Tuesday, 26 June)
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] (Tuesday, 26 June)

Last message date: Saturday, 30 June 2007 22:10:17 UTC