- From: aurélien levy <aurelien.levy@free.fr>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 09:54:01 +0200
- To: public-html@w3.org
Yes and it's good a good things, if they don't do that AT will give the url or name of the file, this way the photo can be skipped by AT. I really don't understand the willing to remove some basic features for AT and web accessibility and on the other way the willing to add numbers of new "semantic" markup that in my opinion will result a less accessible web by increasing the difficulty to write "good" html, the difficulty to check if the markup is good and the capacity to misused this new markup. Dan or Karl can you please ask to a WCAG working group member to be involved to this group because i really thing that we are going to a wrong way on web accessibility and i hope that an "official" guy will be more understand and listen that the others accessibility guys in this group Aurélien > > Sadly, sometimes tools and web app authors feel compelled to make > their output pass validators. So flickr for example puts alt="" on my > photos for me. > > Regards, > Maciej > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2007 07:54:13 UTC