On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Henrik Dvergsdal wrote: > > It is true that applications don't tell attributes to be in specific > states. States only exist in the specification. That's where we "tell" > about states. Applications "tell" concrete attributes to be set to > concrete values, or to not exist at all. They don't deal with states at > all. Furthermore we cannot deprive attributes of being in states. An > attribute cannot not be in a state. As long as it is known, it will > allways be in some state, even if it doesn't physically exist and even > if we haven't given that state a particular name and significance. This discussion has become far too philosophical. At the end of the day I still don't understand what is wrong with the use of the word "default". I don't think it does any harm. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'Received on Thursday, 14 June 2007 18:21:38 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:00 GMT