W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > June 2007

Re: Issues list for HTML WG Re: dropping longdesc attribute

From: Martijn <martijn.martijn@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 13:05:49 +0200
Message-ID: <6c97b8b10706250405s29c3d8e1g1bee624973c6ae27@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>
Cc: "Karl Dubost" <karl@w3.org>, "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>

2007/6/25, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>:
>
> On Mon, 25 Jun 2007, Karl Dubost wrote:
> >
> > The lack of a proper bug/issues tracking system
> > 1. creates frustration.
> > 2. leads to discussions then time which would be better used for
> > constructive comments.
> >
> > Would someone or a pair of persons agreed on tracking issues on the
> > list? I don't find hixie's inbox a reasonable system in terms of
> > community.
>
> My inbox is not the issue tracking system for public-html. Please see:
>
>    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007Jun/0003.html
>
> That is the only reliable way of getting issues to the attention of hyatt
> and myself. Currently hyatt is swamped with post-WWDC stuff like Safari3
> bugs, and I'm swamped with the thousands of issues that were raised over
> the last three years, but that should be dealt with within a few months
> and then we'll be going through the list mentioned in the above e-mail,
> addressing all those issues that have been properly reported with no bias,
> full research, and so on.

I think I still would prefer a proper bug tracking system.

Regards,
Martijn
Received on Monday, 25 June 2007 11:21:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:01 GMT