W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > June 2007

Re: How to productively contribute

From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 08:33:37 -0500
Message-ID: <1c8dbcaa0706280633k2497a004s6386abb74639098e@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-html@w3.org

Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote:

> My original e-mail in this thread was intended to point out the
> futility of these discussions, and to try and encourage a more
> productive, rational, approach.

I found that all of the discussions were not futile but rather a
tremendous aid in trying to understand the rationale and view points
on the headers issue.

The discussions (email and blog posts) were a big aid and a necessary
part of the process (along with all of the research) which informed
the resulting the wiki page [1] that I put together.

Like Rob said,

> If anything the willingness to engage others in conversation and try
> to understand the other viewpoints is a necessary precondition to
> being objective. To state it another way: being blinded by ones
> objectivity would be to imagine that no one else in the conversation
> could possibly provide constructive information to inform one's own
> views.

Could the process be more productive and rational?...Perhaps if the
rationale and justification for removing/adding/changing all elements
and attributes was already detailed in the "HTML 5 differences from
HTML 4" document.

Best Regards,

[1] http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/IssueTableHeaders
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007Jun/0949.html

Laura L. Carlson
Received on Thursday, 28 June 2007 13:33:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:22 UTC