W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > June 2007

Re: Why XHTML 5 is a bad name...

From: Robert Burns <rob@robburns.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 13:02:35 -0500
Message-Id: <B57BE5BE-2A23-4BF5-A8F1-9115938030B2@robburns.com>
Cc: Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer <sebastian@dreamlab.net>, public-html@w3.org
To: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au> 


On Jun 26, 2007, at 9:03 PM, Lachlan Hunt wrote:
>
> Given that I have already explained how XHTML2 is seriously  
> incompatible with XHTML1 in previous posts, why do you think XHTML2  
> deserves to be called XHTML?

Your earlier post did not at all explain "how XHTML2 is seriously  
incompatible with XHTML1". It simply listed some edge-case unresolved  
issues in the WG. I would hat to have to read someone producing the  
same list for HTML5.

Take care,
Rob
Received on Wednesday, 27 June 2007 18:02:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:01 GMT