Re: Why XHTML 5 is a bad name...

On Jun 26, 2007, at 9:03 PM, Lachlan Hunt wrote:
>
> Given that I have already explained how XHTML2 is seriously  
> incompatible with XHTML1 in previous posts, why do you think XHTML2  
> deserves to be called XHTML?

Your earlier post did not at all explain "how XHTML2 is seriously  
incompatible with XHTML1". It simply listed some edge-case unresolved  
issues in the WG. I would hat to have to read someone producing the  
same list for HTML5.

Take care,
Rob

Received on Wednesday, 27 June 2007 18:02:46 UTC