W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > June 2007

Re: mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.

From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 13:33:14 +0900
Message-Id: <4AE1E9DE-FBA3-4FD0-AD38-DAE768403CEF@w3.org>
Cc: HTML Working Group <public-html@w3.org>
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>

Le 19 juin 2007 à 06:04, Dan Connolly a écrit :
> When introducing the language to authors, I prefer to stay within
> the bounds of XML. I understand from instructors that this goes
> over well with students. (I hope some of the instructors on this
> list will chime in to give 1st-hand evidence.)

Definitely. XHTML and XML rules of syntax are a lot easier to teach.

> I don't know if I feel strongly enough about it to make a detailed
> design change proposal. But if anyone is writing new tutorial
> material, that's what I suggest.

I'm really tempted to write this tutorial, but it doesn't seem  
reasonable until the new HTML WG staff contact is nominated.

Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
   QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
      *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2007 04:33:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:22 UTC