W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > June 2007

Re: Note on terminology: Attribute types

From: Timmy Jose <zoltan.jose@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:12:26 +0530
Message-ID: <c567fd8c0706120442u3c082abas5e0381e56be50ba7@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Henrik Dvergsdal" <henrik.dvergsdal@hibo.no>
Cc: "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>
I agree with Henrik on this point. We must settle on an unambiguous term for
the concept. "element attribute" sounds fine.
Btw, refreshing to see such a nice, to the point and unambiguous mail in
this forum. A very rare feat indeed!

Regards,

Timmy Jose.

On 6/12/07, Henrik Dvergsdal <henrik.dvergsdal@hibo.no> wrote:
>
>
> I think we will gain precision by using consistent, spec-wide
> terminology to distinguish between DOM attributes and attributes
> defined on elements (reflected by the DOM Attr interface). The spec
> uses (at least) three different terms for the latter:
>
> "attribute"
> "content attribute"
> "element attribute"
>
> IMO "element attribute" is the most unambiguous and descriptive
> alternative. At least, simply using "attribute" should be avoided.
>
> --
> Henrik D
>
>
>


-- 
Sanity check failed. Hence the victory.
Received on Tuesday, 12 June 2007 11:42:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:38:45 UTC