W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > June 2007

Re: Proposal: accessibility revision for the img element...

From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 10:45:07 +0900
Message-Id: <0B169F9C-588F-4A54-89AB-9F594398F248@w3.org>
Cc: HTML Working Group <public-html@w3.org>
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>

Le 26 juin 2007 à 21:11, Anne van Kesteren a écrit :
> 0.2% of the pages out there use the <image> element per some non- 
> scientific study Hixie did for Google in 2005-12. You can read that  
> in the source code of the HTML5 specification that handles <image>.  
> What pages "assume" is hard to measure. However, given that all  
> browsers support this quirk I suppose it's necessary.

Is there an interop table  for the "image" element?
Which user agents support it?

Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
   QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
      *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Wednesday, 27 June 2007 01:45:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:22 UTC