W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > June 2007

Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft

From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 09:11:13 +0900
Message-Id: <250BBBCB-D09B-485A-BA38-B226671F2037@w3.org>
To: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>


Le 14 juin 2007 à 01:47, Shawn Medero a écrit :
> On Jun 13, 2007, at 11:41 AM, Jirka Kosek wrote:
>
>> "This XML serialization is called XHTML5 and is basically an  
>> update to
>> XHTML1."
>>
>> Seems pretty strange to use term XHTML5 without approval from  
>> XHTML WG,
>> especially if you know that they don't think that XML  
>> serialization of
>> HTML5 should be called XHTML5.
>
> The HTML Working Group Charter (from March 2007) addresses this:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2007/03/HTML-WG-charter.html
>
> "The mission of the HTML Working Group, part of the HTML Activity,  
> is to continue the evolution of HTML (including classic HTML and  
> XML syntaxes)."
>
> There is some additional language in charter that reinforces that  
> point.

Steven Pemberton, from the XHTML 2.0 WG, requested a few times that  
we do not call it XHTML 5, but something html5x or html5/XML.

-- 
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
   QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
      *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Thursday, 14 June 2007 00:11:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:00 GMT