W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > June 2007

Re: Versioning re-visited (was : mixed signals on "Writing HTML documents", tutorial, etc.)

From: Dimitri Glazkov <dimitri.glazkov@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 12:56:59 -0500
Message-ID: <fb15ac210706231056rd29e043qa0088a6fda655ef8@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Craig Francis" <craig@synergycms.com>
Cc: "Philip Taylor (Webmaster)" <P.Taylor@rhul.ac.uk>, "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>, "Philip & Le Khanh" <Philip-and-LeKhanh@royal-tunbridge-wells.org>, www-archive@w3.org, "HTML Working Group" <public-html@w3.org>

On 6/23/07, Craig Francis <craig@synergycms.com> wrote:
> If the goal-posts move, and there was no declaration of which spec
> version I have written to, then without me making any changes, then
> all of my websites will become invalid overnight... for example,
> because I try to use the @summary attribute on all tables.

I think the whole point of the design idea, proposed by Ian, et al. is
to develop a forward _and_ backward compatible language, where the
documents, written in HTML5 are also HTML6 documents.. unless I am
misunderstanding something.

By inference, this means that subtraction or replacement of language
features in a previous version are not allowed in the next version.
Ian, Anne, is this correct?

Received on Saturday, 23 June 2007 17:57:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:22 UTC