Re: html 5 and accessibility issue

>> Actual argument for removing them :
>> - they have not been used often
>> - in some case new parsing mechanism can achieve the same result
> Actually, this is incorrect:
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007Jun/1039.html
>
as far as i see it's incomplete not incorrect, you can add the we want 
more proof/research argument.
I didn't say that's the official argument, i just say that it's used 
argument.

So if i understand you want test case like the table test case for 
summary and longdesc

Aurélien