W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > June 2007

Re: addition or subtrraction? [was Re: dropping longdesc attribute]

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 18:09:06 -0500
To: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
Cc: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1182812946.6367.1070.camel@pav>

On Mon, 2007-06-25 at 17:48 -0500, Laura Carlson wrote:
> On 6/25/07, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> wrote:
> 
> > The working group has agreed to use the text of the HTML 5 spec
> > for review, but we haven't made any decisions about language itself.
> 
> >From 'Results of Questionnaire Shall we Adopt HTML5 as our
> specification text for review?' [1]
> 
> "A 'yes' response indicates a willingness to use these documents as
> the basis for discussion with the editors and the WG going forward. It
> does not constitute endorsement of the entire feature set specified in
> these documents, nor does it indicate that you feel that the documents
> in their present state should become a W3C Recommendation or even a
> W3C Working Draft."
> 
> Results:
> yes 	88
> no 	4
> concur 	7
> abstain 	3
> 
> I don't 'think' anyone registered a formal objection. [2] Or did they?

Elsewhere on the survey page we see:

'A "no" vote in this survey is a formal objection.'
 -- http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/htmlbg/

So each of the 'no' votes is a formal objection.

> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/htmlbg/results
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/policies#Consensus
> 
> Laura
-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Monday, 25 June 2007 23:09:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:38:45 UTC