On 4 Jun 2007, at 15:33, James Graham wrote: > A link to a page that has to work around the lack of a feature in > some sub-optimal way is a perfect example of how it would "Solve > Real Problems". Indeed if you are unable to find such a link you > will have to work much harder to convince people that the problem > being solved is indeed real. Also, it is very important to > understand how proposed features interact with legacy browsers so > having test documents that use the proposed feature is very valuble. Sure. I agree on all of that. I also think that this should be the major approach and that this type of research is extremely important. But I think there should also be some room for activism and creative thinking. And I think it should be possible to take projections of future developments into account - even if it's not a problem on the current web. -- HenrikReceived on Monday, 4 June 2007 14:33:26 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:00 GMT