W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > June 2007

Re: Why XHTML 5 is a bad name...

From: Dylan Smith <qstage@cox.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 16:44:19 -0700
To: Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer <sebastian@dreamlab.net>, <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <C2A6F2E3.41EB%qstage@cox.net>




on 6/26/07 3:24 PM, Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer at sebastian@dreamlab.net
wrote:

> 
> 
> ... because it violates the principle
> of cognitive dissonance. Things that
> are different should be named different.
> XHTML 2 and XHTML 5 are two totally
> different animals, whilst the outside
> impression would be that XHTML 5
> is the successor of XHTML 2, which
> isn't the case since its a fork.
> 
> Use case: Common Sense.
> 
> Will result in: Even More Confusion.
> 
> Suggestion: Rename XHTML 5 into
> something different.
> 
> - Sebastian
> 
> 

+1
Received on Tuesday, 26 June 2007 23:42:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:38:45 UTC