W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > June 2007

Re: volunteers to review a few sections of the HTML 5 spec in detail?

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 11:36:32 -0500
To: Henrik Dvergsdal <henrik.dvergsdal@hibo.no>
Cc: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1181320592.13326.194.camel@pav>

On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 16:00 +0200, Henrik Dvergsdal wrote:
> On 8 Jun 2007, at 15:48, Shawn Medero wrote:
> 
> > The Tasks survey specifies what the sections should be:
> 
> Ah thanks, that was excactly what I was looking for. Just didn't  
> scroll far enough down the page.

There are also some suggestions regarding guidelines:

[[
Suggestions on sending comments for review:

      * Cite the material you're reviewing by URI, date, and section
        title. Don't rely on "section 3.2" remaining unambiguous for
        long.
      * For significant issues, send a separate message for each issue
      * For editorial issues, use your own discretion about how many to
        lump in one message.
      * Bonus points for attaching test cases
      * Send a message to signal that you're done with your review. It's
        OK to include editorial comments in this message, but if you're
        going to mention significant technical issues, do so by
        reference to separate messages about those issues.

Consider summarizing the discussion of the issues you raised in the wiki
issues list. Keep in mind an obligation to summarize points of view even
when you disagree with them.
]]
http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/tasks83/results#xwhichsec

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Friday, 8 June 2007 16:41:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:38:45 UTC