- From: Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer <sebastian@dreamlab.net>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 00:24:35 +0200
- To: public-html@w3.org
... because it violates the principle of cognitive dissonance. Things that are different should be named different. XHTML 2 and XHTML 5 are two totally different animals, whilst the outside impression would be that XHTML 5 is the successor of XHTML 2, which isn't the case since its a fork. Use case: Common Sense. Will result in: Even More Confusion. Suggestion: Rename XHTML 5 into something different. - Sebastian
Received on Tuesday, 26 June 2007 22:24:44 UTC