W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > June 2007

Re: dialog vs. dialogue (dl)

From: scott lewis <sfl@scotfl.ca>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 13:04:59 -0600
Message-Id: <B0DE565F-44AD-4BB0-8B0B-3A0237F4DA31@scotfl.ca>
To: paul haine <paul@joeblade.com>, public-html@w3.org

On 15 Jun 2007, at 1240, paul haine wrote:

> I agree with Nathan that <dialogue> has less potential for  
> confusion. I'd also be interested to know what <dt> and <dd>  
> actually stand for in the context of a <dialog> - wouldn't  
> something like <speaker> and <speech> make more sense?

They stand for "dialog talker" and "dialog discourse". Which are not  
the most obvious element names, but they do retain the parallelism  
between <dialog> and <dl>. (Whether that is a good thing or a bad  
thing is another matter.)


scott lewis.
Received on Friday, 15 June 2007 19:14:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:22 UTC