Dan -- > Unless you have new information sufficient to convince the > chairs that the WG should re-consider the decision, it is > out of order to discuss it. Since this ruling may affect more people than the one to whom the message was specifically addressed, it might be helpful if you referred the group to the relevant part of "standing orders" in which guidance on what is, and what is not, "out of order for discussion" may be found. Philip TaylorReceived on Monday, 25 June 2007 21:51:37 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:01 GMT