On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 15:38:15 +0200, Jon Barnett <jonbarnett@gmail.com> wrote: >> For reference >> http://www.w3.org/TR/css-style-attr > > Are we speifically NOT discussing that draft because it belongs to > another WG? Should we involve that WG in this discussion before > creating a new > element that does exactly the same thing with different syntax? Has the > CSS WG officially declared that draft dead? It seems odd to me for this > WG to drop that style attribute in spec that published around the same > time that another WG published a spec that defines the style attribute's > syntax. 1) The style attribute is not dropped. It hasn't been properly researched yet. 2) The above draft is dead. The CSS WG has not been working on it for years. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>Received on Wednesday, 27 June 2007 13:44:12 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:39:54 GMT