W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > June 2007

Re: Why XHTML 5 is a bad name...

From: Adam Nash <adamn@wirespring.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 20:57:09 -0400
To: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Cc: HTML Working Group <public-html@w3.org>
Message-Id: <200706272057.10240.adamn@wirespring.com>


Has anyone suggested HTXML?

On Tuesday 26 June 2007 08:38 pm, Karl Dubost wrote:
> far stretched and changing the name totally. hawt = hypertext
> applications with web technologies: xhawt (hawt/xhawt -> hot/shot)

I feel guilty for liking this so much.  :)

Received on Thursday, 28 June 2007 00:59:20 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Karl Dubost: "Re: SURVEY: Release "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" as a W3C Working Draft? formal decision"
Previous message: Charles McCathieNevile: "Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"]"
In reply to: Karl Dubost: "Re: Why XHTML 5 is a bad name..."
Next in thread: Patrick Garies: "Re: Why XHTML 5 is a bad name..."

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:39:54 GMT