W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > June 2007

Re: Author-friendlier definition of <object> (was Re: fear of "invisible metadata")

From: Sander Tekelenburg <st@isoc.nl>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 11:54:28 +0200
Message-Id: <p06240699c2a935206d26@[192.168.0.102]>
To: public-html@w3.org

At 14:40 +0300 UTC, on 2007-06-27, Henri Sivonen wrote:

> On Jun 27, 2007, at 14:28, Sander Tekelenburg wrote:
>
>> Understood by whom? From reading the definition of "browsing
>> context" it
>> isn't clear to *me* exactly how it differs from "web page". If they
>> are
>> different, maybe "web page" needs to be defined as well.
>
> Different Web pages can be loaded into one browser context one after
> another over time. It says so in the next paragraph after the term
> definition.

For the life of me I cannot find that.

Anyway, all this only shows that it will take quite a lot more than 'quick
hacks' to make the spec understandable to web publishers, including authoring
tool developers.


-- 
Sander Tekelenburg
The Web Repair Initiative: <http://webrepair.org/>
Received on Thursday, 28 June 2007 10:01:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:38:46 UTC