Thomas Broyer wrote: > > If a future evolution of HTML needs to be incompatible with "HTML 5", > it will "just" have to have another media type. This will ensure that > "legacy UAs" won't fail at processing this eventual "new HTML". That approach works best if Content-Type is treated as authoritative. - Sam Ruby (Still a bit grumpy about not being able to serve data which contains fragments of feeds as 'text/plain')Received on Friday, 22 June 2007 01:20:05 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:01 GMT