W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > June 2007

Re: Why XHTML 5 is a bad name...

From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 09:38:23 +0900
Message-Id: <F2366D91-3012-40E2-9C7A-F39BC30CA858@w3.org>
Cc: HTML Working Group <public-html@w3.org>
To: Arun <arun.ranganathan@corp.aol.com>

Le 27 juin 2007 à 09:01, Arun a écrit :
> If someone comes up with a great proposal, I'm all for it, but I'm  
> not terribly worried about confusion yet (speaking on behalf of a  
> company that authors web pages).  A strawman might be "HTML5 as  
> XML" (since when we use that, we're supposed to use a strict  
> mimetype anyway).

html5 as xml

far stretched and changing the name totally. hawt = hypertext  
applications with web technologies: xhawt (hawt/xhawt -> hot/shot)

Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
   QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
      *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Wednesday, 27 June 2007 00:38:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:22 UTC