Adam Barth
Adrian Cole
- Re: HTTP/2 schedule - implementation draft, interim meeting, WGLC (Friday, 14 March)
- Re: HTTP/2 schedule - implementation draft, interim meeting, WGLC (Friday, 14 March)
- Re: Security implications of gzip #423 (Friday, 14 March)
- Re: debug field in GOAWAY (Saturday, 22 February)
- http/2 presentation at a large Java conference (Tuesday, 4 February)
- Re: Reasons to not use huffman encoding? (Friday, 31 January)
- Reasons to not use huffman encoding? (Friday, 31 January)
- Re: Compression ratio of HPACK. (Thursday, 30 January)
- Re: Server Push -> Cache Push? (Thursday, 30 January)
- Re: GOAWAY -> GTFO (Tuesday, 28 January)
- Re: GOAWAY -> GTFO (Tuesday, 28 January)
- Does anyone know if F5 are working on http/2 (Friday, 10 January)
- Re: HTTP/2.0 draft, NPN/ALPN, and TLS (Friday, 10 January)
- Things I like about HPACK (Friday, 10 January)
- Re: working on HPACK test case (Friday, 10 January)
Adrien de Croy
Albert Lunde
Alexey Melnikov
Amit Aggarwal
Amos Jeffries
- Re: Client requesting authentication on server & thomson-httpbis-catch (Monday, 31 March)
- Re: draft-montenegro-httpbis-uri-encoding (Friday, 21 March)
- Re: draft-montenegro-httpbis-uri-encoding (Friday, 21 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Consensus Call) (Friday, 21 March)
- Re: Time out error code for HTTP/2 stream? (Friday, 21 March)
- Re: Server push limited to cache priming? (Friday, 21 March)
- Re: draft-montenegro-httpbis-uri-encoding (Friday, 21 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Consensus Call) (Tuesday, 18 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Monday, 17 March)
- Re: WPAD ideas and considerations (Monday, 17 March)
- Re: WPAD ideas and considerations (Sunday, 16 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Friday, 14 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Friday, 14 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Friday, 14 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Friday, 14 March)
- WPAD ideas and considerations (Friday, 14 March)
- RE: HTTP/1.1 proxy behavior when Host differs from absoluteURI (Tuesday, 11 March)
- Re: HTTP/2, "h2t" and protocol identifiers in general (Saturday, 1 March)
- Re: HTTP/2, "h2t" and protocol identifiers in general (Saturday, 1 March)
- Re: "Secure" proxies for HTTP URIs [was: new version trusted-proxy20 draft] (Friday, 28 February)
- Re: issue 381: Discovery of the support of the HTTP2 protocol: DNS-based Upgrade (Friday, 28 February)
- Re: issue 381: Discovery of the support of the HTTP2 protocol: DNS-based Upgrade (Friday, 28 February)
- Re: new version trusted-proxy20 draft (Wednesday, 26 February)
- Re: "Secure" proxies for HTTP URIs [was: new version trusted-proxy20 draft] (Wednesday, 26 February)
- Re: "Secure" proxies for HTTP URIs [was: new version trusted-proxy20 draft] (Wednesday, 26 February)
- Re: h2#404 requiring gzip and/or deflate (Wednesday, 26 February)
- Re: h2#404 requiring gzip and/or deflate (Tuesday, 25 February)
- Re: "Secure" proxies for HTTP URIs [was: new version trusted-proxy20 draft] (Monday, 24 February)
- Re: h2#404 requiring gzip and/or deflate (Friday, 21 February)
- Re: new version trusted-proxy20 draft (Wednesday, 19 February)
- Re: issue 381: Discovery of the support of the HTTP2 protocol: DNS-based Upgrade (Wednesday, 12 February)
- Re: WINDOW_UPDATE with streamid = 0 redundant? (Tuesday, 11 February)
- Re: How to handle HTTP/2 negotiation failure WRT TLS (Thursday, 6 February)
- Re: HTTP/1.1bis draft -26 (Thursday, 6 February)
- Re: Reasons to not use huffman encoding? (Friday, 31 January)
- Re: Compression ratio of HPACK. (Friday, 31 January)
- Re: Server Push -> Cache Push? (Thursday, 30 January)
- Re: #552: allow privacy proxies to be conformant (Wednesday, 29 January)
- Re: GOAWAY -> GTFO (Monday, 27 January)
- Re: GOAWAY -> GTFO (Monday, 27 January)
- RE: GOAWAY -> GTFO (Monday, 27 January)
- Re: Comments on draft-chan-http2-stream-dependencies-00 (Sunday, 19 January)
- Re: *** GMX Spamverdacht *** Re: #550 handling mismatches between socket connection and host header field (Thursday, 16 January)
- Re: *** GMX Spamverdacht *** Re: UTF-8 in URIs (Thursday, 16 January)
- Re: Comments on draft-chan-http2-stream-dependencies-00 (Thursday, 16 January)
- Re: why not WPAD? (Thursday, 16 January)
- Re: Comments on draft-chan-http2-stream-dependencies-00 (Wednesday, 15 January)
- Re: #547 clarify PUT on content negotiated resource (Saturday, 11 January)
- Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-chan-http2-stream-dependencies-00.txt (Monday, 6 January)
- Re: HPACK: replace Huffman by possibly faster and more efficient FSE (Finite State Entropy) (Monday, 6 January)
- Re: userinfo in :authority (Monday, 6 January)
- Re: #532 IESG ballot on draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-25, reason phrase optional? (Saturday, 4 January)
- Re: #545 requirement on implementing methods according to their semantics (Friday, 3 January)
- Re: #539: mention TLS vs plain text passwords or dict attacks? (Thursday, 2 January)
Appanasamy, Palanivelan
Ashok Kumar
Barry Leiba
Best
Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: draft-montenegro-httpbis-uri-encoding (Tuesday, 25 March)
- Re: current HTTP/2 spec prevents gzip of response to "Range" request (Monday, 24 March)
- Re: current HTTP/2 spec prevents gzip of response to "Range" request (Monday, 24 March)
- Re: draft-montenegro-httpbis-uri-encoding (Friday, 21 March)
- Re: draft-montenegro-httpbis-uri-encoding (Friday, 21 March)
- Re: draft-montenegro-httpbis-uri-encoding (Friday, 21 March)
- Re: draft-montenegro-httpbis-uri-encoding (Friday, 21 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Consensus Call) (Tuesday, 18 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Consensus Call) (Tuesday, 18 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Friday, 14 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Friday, 14 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Friday, 14 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Friday, 14 March)
- Re: Security implications of gzip #423 (Friday, 14 March)
- Re: h2#404 requiring gzip and/or deflate (Tuesday, 25 February)
- Re: new version trusted-proxy20 draft (Monday, 24 February)
- Re: h2#404 requiring gzip and/or deflate (Friday, 21 February)
- Re: h2#404 requiring gzip and/or deflate (Friday, 21 February)
- Re: h2#404 requiring gzip and/or deflate (Thursday, 20 February)
- Re: HTTP Status 308 (Permanent Redirect) (Thursday, 6 February)
- Re: #551: recipient handling of trailer fields (Friday, 31 January)
- Re: #552: allow privacy proxies to be conformant (Wednesday, 29 January)
- Re: #550 handling mismatches between socket connection and host header field (Thursday, 16 January)
- Re: UTF-8 in URIs (Thursday, 16 January)
- Re: #547 clarify PUT on content negotiated resource (Friday, 10 January)
- Re: userinfo in :authority (Tuesday, 7 January)
block.rxckin.beats@gmail.com
Brian Raymor (MS OPEN TECH)
Brian Smith
Bruce Perens
Carsten Bormann
Christian Huitema
CIURANA EUGENE (pr3d4t0r)
Cory Benfield
- Re: h2#404 requiring gzip and/or deflate (Saturday, 22 March)
- Re: issue 381: Discovery of the support of the HTTP2 protocol: DNS-based Upgrade (Friday, 28 February)
- Re: The first settings (Friday, 28 February)
- Re: h2#404 requiring gzip and/or deflate (Tuesday, 25 February)
- Re: h2#404 requiring gzip and/or deflate (Tuesday, 25 February)
- Re: The first settings (Monday, 24 February)
- Re: padding and compression (Monday, 24 February)
- Re: debug field in GOAWAY (Saturday, 22 February)
- Re: debug field in GOAWAY (Friday, 21 February)
- Re: debug field in GOAWAY (Friday, 21 February)
Craig Taylor
Dan Wing
Daniel Sommermann
- Re: Server push limited to cache priming? (Wednesday, 19 March)
- Server push limited to cache priming? (Wednesday, 19 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Consensus Call) (Tuesday, 18 March)
- HTTP/1.1 proxy behavior when Host differs from absoluteURI (Tuesday, 11 March)
- Re: PUSH_PROMISE associated stream (Monday, 10 March)
- PUSH_PROMISE associated stream (Monday, 10 March)
- Re: h2#404 requiring gzip and/or deflate (Tuesday, 25 February)
- Re: WINDOW_UPDATE with streamid = 0 redundant? (Tuesday, 11 February)
- Re: WINDOW_UPDATE with streamid = 0 redundant? (Tuesday, 11 February)
- WINDOW_UPDATE with streamid = 0 redundant? (Tuesday, 11 February)
- User defined SETTINGS frame extensions (Friday, 7 February)
- Re: GOAWAY -> GTFO (Tuesday, 28 January)
- GOAWAY -> GTFO (Monday, 27 January)
- Re: minimum value for SETTINGS_MAX_CONCURRENT_STREAMS (Friday, 3 January)
- minimum value for SETTINGS_MAX_CONCURRENT_STREAMS (Friday, 3 January)
Daniel Stenberg
Dave Thaler
David Booth
David Krauss
David Morris
DRUTA, DAN
Eliezer Croitoru
Eliot Lear
- Re: WPAD ideas and considerations (Sunday, 16 March)
- Re: Preliminary minutes from the Design Team Meeting: WPAD and Proxy.pac (Thursday, 13 March)
- Re: The "trusted" / "explicit" proxy discussion (Tuesday, 25 February)
- Re: issue 381: Discovery of the support of the HTTP2 protocol: DNS-based Upgrade (Thursday, 20 February)
- Re: issue 381: Discovery of the support of the HTTP2 protocol: DNS-based Upgrade (Thursday, 20 February)
- draft-loreto-httpbis-trusted-proxy (Wednesday, 19 February)
- Re: issue 381: Discovery of the support of the HTTP2 protocol: DNS-based Upgrade (Tuesday, 18 February)
- Re: issue 381: Discovery of the support of the HTTP2 protocol: DNS-based Upgrade (Tuesday, 18 February)
- Re: issue 381: Discovery of the support of the HTTP2 protocol: DNS-based Upgrade (Monday, 17 February)
- Re: why not WPAD? (Wednesday, 15 January)
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-02.txt (Sunday, 5 January)
emile.stephan@orange.com
- RE: Preliminary minutes from the Design Team Meeting: WPAD and Proxy.pac (Monday, 10 March)
- RE: Alternate service framework: question about Alt-Svc HTTP Header Field (Thursday, 6 March)
- RE: Alternate service framework: question about Alt-Svc HTTP Header Field (Thursday, 6 March)
- RE: Alternate service framework: question about Alt-Svc HTTP Header Field (Thursday, 6 March)
- RE: Alternate service framework: question about Alt-Svc HTTP Header Field (Thursday, 6 March)
- RE: Alternate service framework: question about Alt-Svc HTTP Header Field (Thursday, 6 March)
- Alternate service framework: question about Alt-Svc HTTP Header Field (Wednesday, 5 March)
- Dynamic discovery of the support for HTTP/2 during domain name resolution (Sunday, 2 March)
- RE: Preliminary agenda for London: explicit proxy discussion in HTTPbis (Friday, 28 February)
- RE: Secure Proxy definition [was: "Secure" proxies for HTTP URIs] (Friday, 28 February)
- RE: The "trusted" / "explicit" proxy discussion: ML for HTTP2 proxy discussion ? (Wednesday, 26 February)
- RE: The "trusted" / "explicit" proxy discussion: ML for HTTP2 proxy discussion ? (Tuesday, 25 February)
- RE: The "trusted" / "explicit" proxy discussion: ML for HTTP2 proxy discussion ? (Tuesday, 25 February)
- RE: issue 381: Discovery of the support of the HTTP2 protocol: DNS-based Upgrade (Wednesday, 12 February)
- issue 381: Discovery of the support of the HTTP2 protocol: DNS-based Upgrade (Wednesday, 12 February)
- RE: Trusted Proxy Alternatives Analysis (Friday, 7 February)
Eric Rescorla
Fabian Keil
Fred Akalin
Frode Kileng
Frédéric Kayser
Gabriel Montenegro
Glen Knowles
Guustaaf Damave
Gábor Molnár
Hasan Khalil
henry.story@bblfish.net
IESG Secretary
Ilari Liusvaara
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Sunday, 16 March)
- Re: FYI: proposal for client authentication in TLS (Saturday, 8 March)
- Re: FYI: proposal for client authentication in TLS (Saturday, 8 March)
- Re: FYI: proposal for client authentication in TLS (Saturday, 8 March)
- Re: HPACK edge cases (Friday, 7 March)
- HPACK edge cases (Friday, 7 March)
- Re: [HPACK]Looking for huffman frequency tables (Friday, 7 March)
- Re: [HPACK]Looking for huffman frequency tables (Friday, 7 March)
- Re: new version trusted-proxy20 draft (Monday, 24 February)
- Re: new version trusted-proxy20 draft (Monday, 24 February)
- Re: new version trusted-proxy20 draft (Monday, 24 February)
- Re: debug field in GOAWAY (Friday, 21 February)
- Re: User defined SETTINGS frame extensions (Friday, 7 February)
- Re: TLS renegotiation (Monday, 3 February)
- Re: TLS renegotiation (Wednesday, 29 January)
- Re: TLS renegotiation (Wednesday, 29 January)
internet-drafts@ietf.org
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-00.txt (Friday, 28 March)
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-header-compression-06.txt (Friday, 14 February)
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-10.txt (Thursday, 13 February)
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-authscheme-registrations-10.txt (Thursday, 6 February)
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-method-registrations-15.txt (Thursday, 6 February)
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-p7-auth-26.txt (Thursday, 6 February)
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-26.txt (Thursday, 6 February)
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-p5-range-26.txt (Thursday, 6 February)
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-26.txt (Thursday, 6 February)
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-26.txt (Thursday, 6 February)
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-26.txt (Thursday, 6 February)
James Cloos
James M Snell
Jeff Pinner
- Re: PUSH_PROMISE associated stream (Monday, 10 March)
- Re: new version trusted-proxy20 draft (Wednesday, 26 February)
- Re: h2#404 requiring gzip and/or deflate (Tuesday, 25 February)
- Re: h2#404 requiring gzip and/or deflate (Friday, 21 February)
- Re: Padding for PUSH_PROMISE frames (Friday, 14 February)
- Re: Re-work of op-code patterns (Wednesday, 12 February)
- Re: Priority straw man (Monday, 10 February)
- Re: Priority straw man (Monday, 10 February)
- Re: Priority straw man (Saturday, 8 February)
- Re: Priority straw man (Saturday, 8 February)
- Re: HPACK padding (Friday, 7 February)
- Re: HPACK padding (Friday, 7 February)
- Re: HPACK padding (Friday, 7 February)
- Re: Reasons to not use huffman encoding? (Friday, 31 January)
- Re: Compression ratio of HPACK. (Friday, 31 January)
- Re: Compression ratio of HPACK. (Friday, 31 January)
- Re: Server Push -> Cache Push? (Thursday, 30 January)
- Re: Priority straw man (Monday, 27 January)
- Re: Priority straw man (Monday, 27 January)
- Re: Priority straw man (Monday, 27 January)
- Re: Re-work of op-code patterns (Monday, 27 January)
- Re: Re-work of op-code patterns (Monday, 27 January)
- Re: Comments on draft-chan-http2-stream-dependencies-00 (Monday, 20 January)
- Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-chan-http2-stream-dependencies-00.txt (Tuesday, 14 January)
- Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-chan-http2-stream-dependencies-00.txt (Tuesday, 14 January)
- Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-chan-http2-stream-dependencies-00.txt (Tuesday, 14 January)
- Re: working on HPACK test case (Friday, 10 January)
- Re: HTTP/2 stream state Reserved can only go to Half-Closed (Thursday, 9 January)
Jesse Wilson
John Mattsson
Johnny Graettinger
Josh Goodall
Julian Reschke
- Re: #426: Unsupported Scheme (Monday, 31 March)
- Re: Adopting Alternative Services as a WG product (Friday, 28 March)
- Re: Adopting Alternative Services as a WG product (Friday, 28 March)
- Improving detection of unsupported Content-Codings, was: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Consensus Call) (Tuesday, 25 March)
- Re: draft-montenegro-httpbis-uri-encoding (Monday, 24 March)
- Re: draft-montenegro-httpbis-uri-encoding (Saturday, 22 March)
- RE: draft-montenegro-httpbis-uri-encoding (Saturday, 22 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Consensus Call) (Friday, 21 March)
- Re: draft-montenegro-httpbis-uri-encoding (Friday, 21 March)
- Re: draft-montenegro-httpbis-uri-encoding (Friday, 21 March)
- Re: draft-montenegro-httpbis-uri-encoding (Friday, 21 March)
- Re: draft-montenegro-httpbis-uri-encoding (Friday, 21 March)
- Re: draft-montenegro-httpbis-uri-encoding (Friday, 21 March)
- Re: draft-montenegro-httpbis-uri-encoding (Friday, 21 March)
- Re: draft-montenegro-httpbis-uri-encoding (Friday, 21 March)
- Re: draft-montenegro-httpbis-uri-encoding (Friday, 21 March)
- Re: draft-montenegro-httpbis-uri-encoding (Friday, 21 March)
- Re: draft-montenegro-httpbis-uri-encoding (Friday, 21 March)
- Re: draft-montenegro-httpbis-uri-encoding (Friday, 21 March)
- Re: draft-montenegro-httpbis-uri-encoding (Friday, 21 March)
- Re: Adopting Alternative Services as a WG product (Friday, 21 March)
- Re: draft-montenegro-httpbis-uri-encoding (Friday, 21 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Consensus Call) (Friday, 21 March)
- RE: Finding consensus on alt-svc, was: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-httpbis-alt-svc as a normative reference in http/2 (Thursday, 20 March)
- Re: *** GMX Spamverdacht *** RE: Finding consensus on alt-svc, was: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-httpbis-alt-svc as a normative reference in http/2 (Thursday, 20 March)
- Re: *** GMX Spamverdacht *** RE: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-httpbis-alt-svc as a normative reference in http/2 (Thursday, 20 March)
- Re: Finding consensus on alt-svc, was: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-httpbis-alt-svc as a normative reference in http/2 (Thursday, 20 March)
- Re: Finding consensus on alt-svc, was: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-httpbis-alt-svc as a normative reference in http/2 (Thursday, 20 March)
- Finding consensus on alt-svc, was: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-httpbis-alt-svc as a normative reference in http/2 (Thursday, 20 March)
- Re: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-httpbis-alt-svc as a normative reference in http/2 (Wednesday, 19 March)
- Re: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-httpbis-alt-svc as a normative reference in http/2 (Wednesday, 19 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Consensus Call) (Wednesday, 19 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Consensus Call) (Tuesday, 18 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Consensus Call) (Tuesday, 18 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Consensus Call) (Tuesday, 18 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Consensus Call) (Tuesday, 18 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Consensus Call) (Tuesday, 18 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Friday, 14 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Friday, 14 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Friday, 14 March)
- Re: Feedback on draft-thomson-httpbis-catch (Tuesday, 11 March)
- Re: FYI: proposal for client authentication in TLS (Tuesday, 11 March)
- Feedback on draft-thomson-httpbis-catch (Tuesday, 11 March)
- Re: FYI: proposal for client authentication in TLS (Tuesday, 11 March)
- Re: FYI: proposal for client authentication in TLS (Monday, 10 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Monday, 10 March)
- Re: FYI: proposal for client authentication in TLS (Monday, 10 March)
- Re: FYI: proposal for client authentication in TLS (Sunday, 9 March)
- Re: Alternate service framework: question about Alt-Svc HTTP Header Field (Thursday, 6 March)
- Re: feedback on draft-nottingham-httpbis-alt-svc (Thursday, 6 March)
- Re: feedback on draft-nottingham-httpbis-alt-svc (Thursday, 6 March)
- Re: Alternate service framework: question about Alt-Svc HTTP Header Field (Thursday, 6 March)
- Re: feedback on draft-nottingham-httpbis-alt-svc (Thursday, 6 March)
- feedback on draft-nottingham-httpbis-alt-svc (Thursday, 6 March)
- alt-svc header field syntax (Wednesday, 5 March)
- Re: Please don't block HTTP/2 on the "http:// schemed URIs over TLS" issue (Wednesday, 5 March)
- Re: HTTP Status 308 (Permanent Redirect) (Thursday, 13 February)
- Re: HTTP Status 308 (Permanent Redirect) (Thursday, 6 February)
- HTTP Status 308 (Permanent Redirect) (Thursday, 6 February)
- Re: TE / transfer-coding issue with qvalue and transfer-parameters — HTTP/1.1, HTTP/2.0 (Monday, 3 February)
- Re: TE / transfer-coding issue with qvalue and transfer-parameters — HTTP/1.1, HTTP/2.0 (Monday, 3 February)
- Re: TE / transfer-coding issue with qvalue and transfer-parameters — HTTP/1.1, HTTP/2.0 (Monday, 3 February)
- getting the HTTP/1.1 specs published (Sunday, 2 February)
- Re: #549: augmented security considerations in p1 (Sunday, 2 February)
- Re: Clarification requested on use of HTTP Redirect 307 (Thursday, 30 January)
- Re: #545 requirement on implementing methods according to their semantics (Tuesday, 28 January)
- Priorities (Tuesday, 28 January)
- Re: #545 requirement on implementing methods according to their semantics (Monday, 27 January)
- Re: #539: mention TLS vs plain text passwords or dict attacks? (Thursday, 23 January)
- Re: #539: mention TLS vs plain text passwords or dict attacks? (Wednesday, 22 January)
- Re: viewport size header (Saturday, 18 January)
- Re: *** GMX Spamverdacht *** Re: *** GMX Spamverdacht *** Re: UTF-8 in URIs (Friday, 17 January)
- Re: *** GMX Spamverdacht *** Re: UTF-8 in URIs (Friday, 17 January)
- Re: UTF-8 in URIs (Friday, 17 January)
- #532 draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-25, "5.7.2 Transformations" (Thursday, 16 January)
- Re: *** GMX Spamverdacht *** Re: #550 handling mismatches between socket connection and host header field (Thursday, 16 January)
- #550 handling mismatches between socket connection and host header field (Thursday, 16 January)
- Re: UTF-8 in URIs (Thursday, 16 January)
- Re: Clarification on HTTP redirects 301,302, and 307 (Thursday, 16 January)
- Re: Clarification on HTTP redirects 301,302, and 307 (Thursday, 16 January)
- Re: Clarification on HTTP redirects 301,302, and 307 (Thursday, 16 January)
- Re: Clarification on HTTP redirects 301,302, and 307 (Thursday, 16 January)
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-hunt-http-rest-redirect-00.txt (Thursday, 16 January)
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-hunt-http-rest-redirect-00.txt (Thursday, 16 January)
- Re: *** GMX Spamverdacht *** Re: UTF-8 in URIs (Thursday, 16 January)
- Re: UTF-8 in URIs (Thursday, 16 January)
- Re: UTF-8 in URIs (Thursday, 16 January)
- Re: UTF-8 in URIs (Thursday, 16 January)
- Re: UTF-8 in URIs (Thursday, 16 January)
- Re: UTF-8 in URIs (Thursday, 16 January)
- Re: UTF-8 in URIs (Thursday, 16 January)
- Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-hunt-http-rest-redirect-00.txt (Thursday, 16 January)
- Re: UTF-8 in URIs (Thursday, 16 January)
- Re: #549 augment security considerations (Wednesday, 15 January)
- Re: #549 augment security considerations (Wednesday, 15 January)
- #549 augment security considerations (Monday, 13 January)
- Re: #547 clarify PUT on content negotiated resource (Monday, 13 January)
- #547 clarify PUT on content negotiated resource (Friday, 10 January)
- #546 considerations for new headers: privacy (Saturday, 4 January)
- #532 IESG ballot on draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-25, reason phrase optional? (Saturday, 4 January)
- Re: #545 requirement on implementing methods according to their semantics (Saturday, 4 January)
- Re: #545 requirement on implementing methods according to their semantics (Friday, 3 January)
- #545 requirement on implementing methods according to their semantics (Friday, 3 January)
- #539: mention TLS vs plain text passwords or dict attacks? (Thursday, 2 January)
- Re: #540 clarify ABNF layering (Wednesday, 1 January)
K.Morgan@iaea.org
- Re: h2#404 requiring gzip and/or deflate (Monday, 31 March)
- Re: h2#404 requiring gzip and/or deflate (Monday, 31 March)
- Re: h2#404 requiring gzip and/or deflate (Monday, 31 March)
- Re: h2#404 requiring gzip and/or deflate (Monday, 31 March)
- RE: h2#404 requiring gzip and/or deflate (Monday, 31 March)
- Re: current HTTP/2 spec prevents gzip of response to "Range" request (Sunday, 30 March)
- Re: current HTTP/2 spec prevents gzip of response to "Range" request (Saturday, 29 March)
- RE: current HTTP/2 spec prevents gzip of response to "Range" request (Friday, 28 March)
- RE: current HTTP/2 spec prevents gzip of response to "Range" request (Thursday, 27 March)
- RE: current HTTP/2 spec prevents gzip of response to "Range" request (Thursday, 27 March)
- RE: current HTTP/2 spec prevents gzip of response to "Range" request (Wednesday, 26 March)
- RE: current HTTP/2 spec prevents gzip of response to "Range" request (Wednesday, 26 March)
- RE: current HTTP/2 spec prevents gzip of response to "Range" request (Wednesday, 26 March)
- RE: current HTTP/2 spec prevents gzip of response to "Range" request (Wednesday, 26 March)
- RE: current HTTP/2 spec prevents gzip of response to "Range" request (Wednesday, 26 March)
- RE: current HTTP/2 spec prevents gzip of response to "Range" request (Wednesday, 26 March)
- RE: current HTTP/2 spec prevents gzip of response to "Range" request (Wednesday, 26 March)
- RE: current HTTP/2 spec prevents gzip of response to "Range" request (Wednesday, 26 March)
- RE: current HTTP/2 spec prevents gzip of response to "Range" request (Tuesday, 25 March)
- current HTTP/2 spec prevents gzip of response to "Range" request (Monday, 24 March)
Kennedy, Smith (Wireless Architect)
Larry Masinter
Liliana Dinale
Ludin, Stephen
Mark Baker
Mark Nottingham
- Re: current HTTP/2 spec prevents gzip of response to "Range" request (Monday, 31 March)
- Re: Client requesting authentication on server & thomson-httpbis-catch (Monday, 31 March)
- #362: Blocked frame (Sunday, 30 March)
- #421: Mixed Schemes (Sunday, 30 March)
- #426: Unsupported Scheme (Sunday, 30 March)
- Re: HTTPbis WG Interim Meeting, 5-6 June 2014 (Thursday, 27 March)
- Re: Adopting Alternative Services as a WG product (Thursday, 27 March)
- Re: Adopting Alternative Services as a WG product (Thursday, 27 March)
- Re: Adopting Alternative Services as a WG product (Tuesday, 25 March)
- Re: current HTTP/2 spec prevents gzip of response to "Range" request (Tuesday, 25 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Consensus Call) (Monday, 24 March)
- Re: June Interim dates / location (Monday, 24 March)
- Re: June Interim dates / location (Monday, 24 March)
- Re: draft-montenegro-httpbis-uri-encoding (Friday, 21 March)
- Re: Adopting Alternative Services as a WG product (Friday, 21 March)
- Re: draft-montenegro-httpbis-uri-encoding (Friday, 21 March)
- draft-montenegro-httpbis-uri-encoding (Friday, 21 March)
- Re: Client requesting authentication on server & thomson-httpbis-catch (Friday, 21 March)
- Re: Server push limited to cache priming? (Thursday, 20 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Consensus Call) (Thursday, 20 March)
- Adopting Alternative Services as a WG product (Thursday, 20 March)
- Re: Getting to consensus on HTTP:// over TLS (Thursday, 20 March)
- Getting to consensus on HTTP:// over TLS (Thursday, 20 March)
- Re: Finding consensus on alt-svc, was: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-httpbis-alt-svc as a normative reference in http/2 (Thursday, 20 March)
- Re: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-httpbis-alt-svc as a normative reference in http/2 (Thursday, 20 March)
- Re: Server push limited to cache priming? (Thursday, 20 March)
- Re: Server push limited to cache priming? (Thursday, 20 March)
- Re: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-httpbis-alt-svc as a normative reference in http/2 (Thursday, 20 March)
- Re: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-httpbis-alt-svc as a normative reference in http/2 (Thursday, 20 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Consensus Call) (Wednesday, 19 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Consensus Call) (Tuesday, 18 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Consensus Call) (Tuesday, 18 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Monday, 17 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Monday, 17 March)
- June Interim dates / location (Monday, 17 March)
- Preliminary minutes for London IETF (Saturday, 15 March)
- HTTP/2 schedule - implementation draft, interim meeting, WGLC (Wednesday, 12 March)
- Re: Preliminary minutes from the Design Team Meeting: WPAD and Proxy.pac (Thursday, 13 March)
- Re: Preliminary minutes from the Design Team Meeting: WPAD and Proxy.pac (Thursday, 13 March)
- Preliminary minutes from the Design Team Meeting (Saturday, 8 March)
- Re: feedback on draft-nottingham-httpbis-alt-svc (Thursday, 6 March)
- Re: feedback on draft-nottingham-httpbis-alt-svc (Thursday, 6 March)
- Re: HTTP/2, "h2t" and protocol identifiers in general (Tuesday, 4 March)
- Re: HTTP/2, "h2t" and protocol identifiers in general (Tuesday, 4 March)
- Re: HTTP/2, "h2t" and protocol identifiers in general (Friday, 28 February)
- Re: Alt-Svc NOT_AUTHORITATIVE proposal (Thursday, 27 February)
- Re: Preliminary agenda for London (Thursday, 27 February)
- Re: HTTP/2, "h2t" and protocol identifiers in general (Thursday, 27 February)
- Re: The "trusted" / "explicit" proxy discussion: ML for HTTP2 proxy discussion ? (Wednesday, 26 February)
- Re: The "trusted" / "explicit" proxy discussion: ML for HTTP2 proxy discussion ? (Tuesday, 25 February)
- Re: h2#404 requiring gzip and/or deflate (Tuesday, 25 February)
- Re: h2#404 requiring gzip and/or deflate (Tuesday, 25 February)
- Re: The "trusted" / "explicit" proxy discussion (Tuesday, 25 February)
- The "trusted" / "explicit" proxy discussion (Tuesday, 25 February)
- Re: "Secure" proxies for HTTP URIs [was: new version trusted-proxy20 draft] (Monday, 24 February)
- "Secure" proxies for HTTP URIs [was: new version trusted-proxy20 draft] (Monday, 24 February)
- Re: h2#404 requiring gzip and/or deflate (Friday, 21 February)
- Re: issue 381: Discovery of the support of the HTTP2 protocol: DNS-based Upgrade (Thursday, 20 February)
- Re: WebSocket over HTTP/2.0 (Saturday, 15 February)
- Re: HTTP Status 308 (Permanent Redirect) (Friday, 14 February)
- License for test suite (Friday, 14 February)
- Priorities, draft -10 and our next implementation draft (Thursday, 13 February)
- Re: HTTP Status 308 (Permanent Redirect) (Thursday, 13 February)
- Re: Trusted Proxy Alternatives Analysis (Wednesday, 12 February)
- Re: Trusted Proxy Alternatives Analysis (Wednesday, 12 February)
- Preliminary agenda for London (Wednesday, 12 February)
- Re: Announcement: HTTP/2 Design Team Meeting (Tuesday, 11 February)
- Re: Trusted Proxy Alternatives Analysis (Tuesday, 11 February)
- Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-httpbis-alt-svc-03.txt (Tuesday, 11 February)
- Re: HTTP/1.1 revision status [was: HTTP/1.1bis draft -26] (Monday, 10 February)
- HTTP/1.1 revision status [was: HTTP/1.1bis draft -26] (Monday, 10 February)
- Re: How to handle HTTP/2 negotiation failure WRT TLS (Friday, 7 February)
- HTTP/1.1bis draft -26 (Thursday, 6 February)
- Re: How to handle HTTP/2 negotiation failure WRT TLS (Wednesday, 5 February)
- Announcement: HTTP/2 Design Team Meeting (Tuesday, 4 February)
- Re: IETF 89 Preliminary Agenda (Tuesday, 4 February)
- Re: Mark's coalescing proposal (Sunday, 2 February)
- Re: Reasons to not use huffman encoding? (Saturday, 1 February)
- Re: #549: augmented security considerations in p1 (Saturday, 1 February)
- Re: Mark's coalescing proposal (Saturday, 1 February)
- Fwd: IETF 89 Preliminary Agenda (Saturday, 1 February)
- Re: #551: recipient handling of trailer fields (Friday, 31 January)
- Re: Server Push -> Cache Push? (Thursday, 30 January)
- Re: Server Push -> Cache Push? (Thursday, 30 January)
- Server Push -> Cache Push? (Wednesday, 29 January)
- Initial minutes for Zurich (Tuesday, 28 January)
- Re: GOAWAY -> GTFO (Tuesday, 28 January)
- Poll: Design Team Meeting after London (Sunday, 12 January)
- FYI: ALPN implementation status tracking (Friday, 10 January)
- Interim meeting around London? (Thursday, 9 January)
- Re: HTTP/2 and NCSA (Wednesday, 8 January)
- Re: HTTP/2 and NCSA (Tuesday, 7 January)
- Re: #545 requirement on implementing methods according to their semantics (Monday, 6 January)
- Re: #540 clarify ABNF layering (Thursday, 2 January)
- Zurich Agenda (Wednesday, 1 January)
- Re: #540 clarify ABNF layering (Wednesday, 1 January)
Martin J. Dürst
Martin Nilsson
Martin Thomson
- State of the Protocol (2014-03-31) (Monday, 31 March)
- Re: #421: Mixed Schemes (Monday, 31 March)
- Re: h2#404 requiring gzip and/or deflate (Monday, 31 March)
- Re: h2#404 requiring gzip and/or deflate (Monday, 31 March)
- Re: h2#404 requiring gzip and/or deflate (Monday, 31 March)
- Indicating Chosen Service #443 (Monday, 31 March)
- Re: h2#404 requiring gzip and/or deflate (Monday, 31 March)
- Re: Dependency based properties (Thursday, 27 March)
- Re: Dependency based properties (Thursday, 27 March)
- Re: current HTTP/2 spec prevents gzip of response to "Range" request (Wednesday, 26 March)
- Re: Adopting Alternative Services as a WG product (Tuesday, 25 March)
- Re: Adopting Alternative Services as a WG product (Tuesday, 25 March)
- Re: current HTTP/2 spec prevents gzip of response to "Range" request (Tuesday, 25 March)
- Re: FYI: proposal for client authentication in TLS (Tuesday, 25 March)
- Re: current HTTP/2 spec prevents gzip of response to "Range" request (Monday, 24 March)
- Re: current HTTP/2 spec prevents gzip of response to "Range" request (Monday, 24 March)
- Re: current HTTP/2 spec prevents gzip of response to "Range" request (Monday, 24 March)
- Re: current HTTP/2 spec prevents gzip of response to "Range" request (Monday, 24 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Consensus Call) (Friday, 21 March)
- Re: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-httpbis-alt-svc as a normative reference in http/2 (Wednesday, 19 March)
- Re: Server push limited to cache priming? (Wednesday, 19 March)
- Re: Server push limited to cache priming? (Wednesday, 19 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Consensus Call) (Tuesday, 18 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Consensus Call) (Tuesday, 18 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Consensus Call) (Tuesday, 18 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Tuesday, 18 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Friday, 14 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Friday, 14 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Friday, 14 March)
- Re: Security implications of gzip #423 (Friday, 14 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Friday, 14 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Friday, 14 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Friday, 14 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Friday, 14 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Friday, 14 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Friday, 14 March)
- Re: HTTP/2 schedule - implementation draft, interim meeting, WGLC (Friday, 14 March)
- Security implications of gzip #423 (Thursday, 13 March)
- Re: FYI: proposal for client authentication in TLS (Tuesday, 11 March)
- Re: FYI: proposal for client authentication in TLS (Tuesday, 11 March)
- Re: Feedback on draft-thomson-httpbis-catch (Tuesday, 11 March)
- Re: FYI: proposal for client authentication in TLS (Monday, 10 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Monday, 10 March)
- Support for gzip at the server #424 (Monday, 10 March)
- Re: FYI: proposal for client authentication in TLS (Monday, 10 March)
- Re: FYI: proposal for client authentication in TLS (Sunday, 9 March)
- Re: FYI: proposal for client authentication in TLS (Saturday, 8 March)
- Re: FYI: proposal for client authentication in TLS (Saturday, 8 March)
- Re: FYI: proposal for client authentication in TLS (Saturday, 8 March)
- FYI: proposal for client authentication in TLS (Saturday, 8 March)
- Re: Alternate service framework: question about Alt-Svc HTTP Header Field (Thursday, 6 March)
- Re: feedback on draft-nottingham-httpbis-alt-svc (Thursday, 6 March)
- Re: Alternate service framework: question about Alt-Svc HTTP Header Field (Thursday, 6 March)
- Re: feedback on draft-nottingham-httpbis-alt-svc (Thursday, 6 March)
- Re: feedback on draft-nottingham-httpbis-alt-svc (Thursday, 6 March)
- Re: Alternate service framework: question about Alt-Svc HTTP Header Field (Wednesday, 5 March)
- Re: h2#373 HPACK attack mitigation options (Wednesday, 5 March)
- Re: h2#373 HPACK attack mitigation options (Wednesday, 5 March)
- h2#373 HPACK attack mitigation options (Wednesday, 5 March)
- Re: Please don't block HTTP/2 on the "http:// schemed URIs over TLS" issue (Wednesday, 5 March)
- Re: HTTP/2, "h2t" and protocol identifiers in general (Monday, 3 March)
- Re: HTTP/2, "h2t" and protocol identifiers in general (Monday, 3 March)
- Re: HTTP/2, "h2t" and protocol identifiers in general (Monday, 3 March)
- Re: HTTP/2, "h2t" and protocol identifiers in general (Monday, 3 March)
- Re: The first settings (Friday, 28 February)
- Re: The first settings (Thursday, 27 February)
- Re: h2#416: Limit stream count (Thursday, 27 February)
- Re: Alt-Svc NOT_AUTHORITATIVE proposal (Thursday, 27 February)
- Re: Preliminary agenda for London (Thursday, 27 February)
- Re: The first settings (Thursday, 27 February)
- Re: HTTP/2, "h2t" and protocol identifiers in general (Thursday, 27 February)
- Re: HTTP/2, "h2t" and protocol identifiers in general (Thursday, 27 February)
- Re: Alt-Svc NOT_AUTHORITATIVE proposal (Thursday, 27 February)
- Re: Alt-Svc NOT_AUTHORITATIVE proposal (Thursday, 27 February)
- Re: HTTP/2, "h2t" and protocol identifiers in general (Wednesday, 26 February)
- Re: WebSocket over HTTP2 RFC6455 conformance (Wednesday, 26 February)
- h2#416: Limit stream count (Wednesday, 26 February)
- Alt-Svc NOT_AUTHORITATIVE proposal (Tuesday, 25 February)
- Re: h2#404 requiring gzip and/or deflate (Tuesday, 25 February)
- Re: h2#404 requiring gzip and/or deflate (Tuesday, 25 February)
- Re: h2#404 requiring gzip and/or deflate (Tuesday, 25 February)
- Re: h2#404 requiring gzip and/or deflate (Tuesday, 25 February)
- HTTP/2, "h2t" and protocol identifiers in general (Tuesday, 25 February)
- Re: h2#404 requiring gzip and/or deflate (Tuesday, 25 February)
- Re: The "trusted" / "explicit" proxy discussion: ML for HTTP2 proxy discussion ? (Tuesday, 25 February)
- Re: h2#404 requiring gzip and/or deflate (Tuesday, 25 February)
- Re: h2#404 requiring gzip and/or deflate (Tuesday, 25 February)
- Re: padding and compression (Monday, 24 February)
- Re: The first settings (Monday, 24 February)
- Re: h2#404 requiring gzip and/or deflate (Friday, 21 February)
- Re: h2#404 requiring gzip and/or deflate (Friday, 21 February)
- Re: h2#404 requiring gzip and/or deflate (Friday, 21 February)
- Re: debug field in GOAWAY (Friday, 21 February)
- Re: h2#404 requiring gzip and/or deflate (Friday, 21 February)
- h2#404 requiring gzip and/or deflate (Thursday, 20 February)
- Re: issue 381: Discovery of the support of the HTTP2 protocol: DNS-based Upgrade (Thursday, 20 February)
- Re: issue 381: Discovery of the support of the HTTP2 protocol: DNS-based Upgrade (Thursday, 20 February)
- Re: WebSocket over HTTP2 RFC6455 conformance (Thursday, 20 February)
- Re: WebSocket over HTTP2 RFC6455 conformance (Thursday, 20 February)
- Re: WebSocket over HTTP/2.0 (Wednesday, 19 February)
- Re: WebSocket over HTTP2 RFC6455 conformance (Wednesday, 19 February)
- Re: issue 381: Discovery of the support of the HTTP2 protocol: DNS-based Upgrade (Monday, 17 February)
- Re: Padding for PUSH_PROMISE frames (Friday, 14 February)
- Re: Padding for PUSH_PROMISE frames (Friday, 14 February)
- Re: WebSocket over HTTP/2.0 (Friday, 14 February)
- Re: WINDOW_UPDATE with streamid = 0 redundant? (Tuesday, 11 February)
- Re: Priority straw man (Monday, 10 February)
- Re: Priority straw man (Friday, 7 February)
- Re: User defined SETTINGS frame extensions (Friday, 7 February)
- Re: HPACK padding (Friday, 7 February)
- Re: How to handle HTTP/2 negotiation failure WRT TLS (Friday, 7 February)
- Re: Priority straw man (Tuesday, 4 February)
- Re: Priority straw man (Monday, 3 February)
- Re: Priority straw man (Monday, 3 February)
- Re: TLS renegotiation (Monday, 3 February)
- Re: IETF 89 Preliminary Agenda (Monday, 3 February)
- Re: How to handle HTTP/2 negotiation failure WRT TLS (Saturday, 1 February)
- Re: FW: HPACK analysis (Saturday, 1 February)
- Re: Mark's coalescing proposal (Saturday, 1 February)
- Re: Reasons to not use huffman encoding? (Friday, 31 January)
- Re: Mark's coalescing proposal (Friday, 31 January)
- Mark's coalescing proposal (Friday, 31 January)
- Re: How to handle HTTP/2 negotiation failure WRT TLS (Thursday, 30 January)
- Re: Server Push request header fields (Thursday, 30 January)
- Re: TLS renegotiation (Wednesday, 29 January)
- Re: Priority straw man (Wednesday, 29 January)
- Re: Priorities (Tuesday, 28 January)
- Re: GOAWAY -> GTFO (Monday, 27 January)
- Re: GOAWAY -> GTFO (Monday, 27 January)
- Re: GOAWAY -> GTFO (Monday, 27 January)
- Re: Priority straw man (Monday, 27 January)
- Re: Priority straw man (Monday, 27 January)
- Re: Re-work of op-code patterns (Monday, 27 January)
- Priority straw man (Sunday, 26 January)
- Re: BLOCKED frame. (Sunday, 26 January)
- TLS renegotiation (Saturday, 25 January)
- #347 extra opcodes vs. flags (Thursday, 23 January)
- Re: Minutes from the interim? (Thursday, 23 January)
- Re: UTF-8 in URIs (Sunday, 19 January)
- Re: *** GMX Spamverdacht *** Re: UTF-8 in URIs (Thursday, 16 January)
- Re: why not WPAD? (Wednesday, 15 January)
- Re: Security Condideration of initial SETTINGS_MAX_CONCURRENT_STREAMS (Wednesday, 15 January)
- Re: Security Condideration of initial SETTINGS_MAX_CONCURRENT_STREAMS (Wednesday, 15 January)
- Re: Comments on draft-chan-http2-stream-dependencies-00 (Wednesday, 15 January)
- Comments on draft-chan-http2-stream-dependencies-00 (Monday, 13 January)
- Re: #547 clarify PUT on content negotiated resource (Friday, 10 January)
- Re: Error behevior of receiving PUSH_PROMISE when SETTINGS_ENABLE_PUSH is 0 (Friday, 10 January)
- Re: Interim meeting around London? (Thursday, 9 January)
- Re: Questions in draft-09 (Wednesday, 8 January)
- Re: userinfo in :authority (Tuesday, 7 January)
- Re: Questions in draft-09 (Tuesday, 7 January)
- Re: userinfo in :authority (Tuesday, 7 January)
- userinfo in :authority (Monday, 6 January)
- Re: minimum value for SETTINGS_MAX_CONCURRENT_STREAMS (Sunday, 5 January)
- Re: minimum value for SETTINGS_MAX_CONCURRENT_STREAMS (Friday, 3 January)
Matthew Kerwin
- Re: current HTTP/2 spec prevents gzip of response to "Range" request (Sunday, 30 March)
- Re: current HTTP/2 spec prevents gzip of response to "Range" request (Friday, 28 March)
- Re: current HTTP/2 spec prevents gzip of response to "Range" request (Thursday, 27 March)
- Re: current HTTP/2 spec prevents gzip of response to "Range" request (Thursday, 27 March)
- Re: current HTTP/2 spec prevents gzip of response to "Range" request (Thursday, 27 March)
- Re: current HTTP/2 spec prevents gzip of response to "Range" request (Wednesday, 26 March)
- Re: current HTTP/2 spec prevents gzip of response to "Range" request (Wednesday, 26 March)
- Re: current HTTP/2 spec prevents gzip of response to "Range" request (Tuesday, 25 March)
- Re: current HTTP/2 spec prevents gzip of response to "Range" request (Tuesday, 25 March)
- Re: current HTTP/2 spec prevents gzip of response to "Range" request (Monday, 24 March)
- Re: draft-montenegro-httpbis-uri-encoding (Friday, 21 March)
- Re: HTTP/2, "h2t" and protocol identifiers in general (Monday, 3 March)
- Re: HTTP/2, "h2t" and protocol identifiers in general (Saturday, 1 March)
- Re: h2#404 requiring gzip and/or deflate (Friday, 21 February)
- Re: Server Push -> Cache Push? (Thursday, 30 January)
- Re: GOAWAY -> GTFO (Wednesday, 29 January)
MIAN.HASAN.KHALIL@GMAIL.COM
Michael Köller
Michael Ray
Michael Sweet
- Re: draft-montenegro-httpbis-uri-encoding (Friday, 21 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Consensus Call) (Tuesday, 18 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Friday, 14 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Friday, 14 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Friday, 14 March)
- Re: h2#373 HPACK attack mitigation options (Wednesday, 5 March)
- Re: h2#373 HPACK attack mitigation options (Wednesday, 5 March)
- Re: h2#404 requiring gzip and/or deflate (Tuesday, 25 February)
- Re: h2#404 requiring gzip and/or deflate (Tuesday, 25 February)
- Re: h2#404 requiring gzip and/or deflate (Tuesday, 25 February)
- Re: h2#404 requiring gzip and/or deflate (Tuesday, 25 February)
- Re: h2#404 requiring gzip and/or deflate (Friday, 21 February)
- Re: Priority straw man (Monday, 10 February)
- Re: HTTP/1.1 revision status [was: HTTP/1.1bis draft -26] (Monday, 10 February)
- Re: Priority straw man (Saturday, 8 February)
- Re: Priority straw man (Saturday, 8 February)
- Re: HPACK padding (Friday, 7 February)
- Re: How to handle HTTP/2 negotiation failure WRT TLS (Wednesday, 5 February)
- Re: Priority straw man (Tuesday, 4 February)
- Re: How to handle HTTP/2 negotiation failure WRT TLS (Monday, 3 February)
- Re: Reasons to not use huffman encoding? (Monday, 3 February)
- Re: Reasons to not use huffman encoding? (Friday, 31 January)
- Re: #549: augmented security considerations in p1 (Friday, 31 January)
- Re: How to handle HTTP/2 negotiation failure WRT TLS (Thursday, 30 January)
- Re: How to handle HTTP/2 negotiation failure WRT TLS (Thursday, 30 January)
- Re: TLS renegotiation (Wednesday, 29 January)
- Re: Priorities (Tuesday, 28 January)
- Re: UTF-8 in URIs (Friday, 17 January)
- Re: UTF-8 in URIs (Thursday, 16 January)
- Re: UTF-8 in URIs (Wednesday, 15 January)
- Re: #549 augment security considerations (Monday, 13 January)
- Re: HPACK: replace Huffman by possibly faster and more efficient FSE (Finite State Entropy) (Monday, 6 January)
Mikael Abrahamsson
Mike Belshe
Mike Bishop
Moto Ishizawa
Nicholas Hurley
Nicolas Mailhot
- Re: draft-montenegro-httpbis-uri-encoding (Monday, 24 March)
- Re: draft-montenegro-httpbis-uri-encoding (Friday, 21 March)
- Re: draft-montenegro-httpbis-uri-encoding (Friday, 21 March)
- Re: draft-montenegro-httpbis-uri-encoding (Friday, 21 March)
- Re: draft-montenegro-httpbis-uri-encoding (Friday, 21 March)
- Re: draft-montenegro-httpbis-uri-encoding (Friday, 21 March)
- Re: draft-montenegro-httpbis-uri-encoding (Friday, 21 March)
- Re: draft-montenegro-httpbis-uri-encoding (Friday, 21 March)
- Re: draft-montenegro-httpbis-uri-encoding (Friday, 21 March)
- Re: draft-montenegro-httpbis-uri-encoding (Friday, 21 March)
- Re: draft-montenegro-httpbis-uri-encoding (Friday, 21 March)
- Re: draft-montenegro-httpbis-uri-encoding (Friday, 21 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Monday, 17 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Monday, 17 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Monday, 17 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Monday, 17 March)
- Re: WPAD ideas and considerations (Monday, 17 March)
- Re: Preliminary minutes from the Design Team Meeting: WPAD and Proxy.pac (Monday, 17 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Monday, 17 March)
- Re: Please don't block HTTP/2 on the "http:// schemed URIs over TLS" issue (Wednesday, 5 March)
- Re: "Secure" proxies for HTTP URIs [was: new version trusted-proxy20 draft] (Monday, 3 March)
- RE: issue 381: Discovery of the support of the HTTP2 protocol: DNS-based Upgrade (Monday, 3 March)
- RE: Secure Proxy definition [was: "Secure" proxies for HTTP URIs] (Saturday, 1 March)
- Re: "Secure" proxies for HTTP URIs [was: new version trusted-proxy20 draft] (Tuesday, 25 February)
- Re: new version trusted-proxy20 draft (Monday, 24 February)
- Re: "Secure" proxies for HTTP URIs [was: new version trusted-proxy20 draft] (Monday, 24 February)
- Re: "Secure" proxies for HTTP URIs [was: new version trusted-proxy20 draft] (Monday, 24 February)
- Re: new version trusted-proxy20 draft (Wednesday, 19 February)
- Re: new version trusted-proxy20 draft (Wednesday, 19 February)
- Re: new version trusted-proxy20 draft (Monday, 17 February)
- Re: Trusted Proxy Alternatives Analysis (Wednesday, 12 February)
- Re: Trusted Proxy Alternatives Analysis (Tuesday, 11 February)
- Re: Trusted Proxy Alternatives Analysis (Monday, 10 February)
- Re: *** GMX Spamverdacht *** Re: UTF-8 in URIs (Friday, 17 January)
- Re: UTF-8 in URIs (Friday, 17 January)
- Re: UTF-8 in URIs (Thursday, 16 January)
- Re: UTF-8 in URIs (Thursday, 16 January)
- Re: UTF-8 in URIs (Thursday, 16 January)
- Re: UTF-8 in URIs (Thursday, 16 January)
- Re: why not WPAD? (Thursday, 16 January)
- Re: why not WPAD? (Thursday, 16 January)
- Re: UTF-8 in URIs (Thursday, 16 January)
- Re: why not WPAD? (Thursday, 16 January)
- Re: new draft trusted-proxy20-00 (Tuesday, 14 January)
- Re: new draft trusted-proxy20-00 (Monday, 13 January)
- Re: HTTP/2 and NCSA (Tuesday, 7 January)
Osama Mazahir
Patrick McManus
- Re: h2#404 requiring gzip and/or deflate (Monday, 31 March)
- Re: current HTTP/2 spec prevents gzip of response to "Range" request (Wednesday, 26 March)
- Re: current HTTP/2 spec prevents gzip of response to "Range" request (Tuesday, 25 March)
- Re: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-httpbis-alt-svc as a normative reference in http/2 (Wednesday, 19 March)
- Re: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-httpbis-alt-svc as a normative reference in http/2 (Wednesday, 19 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Friday, 14 March)
- Re: feedback on draft-nottingham-httpbis-alt-svc (Thursday, 6 March)
- Re: feedback on draft-nottingham-httpbis-alt-svc (Thursday, 6 March)
- Re: issue 381: Discovery of the support of the HTTP2 protocol: DNS-based Upgrade (Thursday, 27 February)
- Re: Alt-Svc NOT_AUTHORITATIVE proposal (Thursday, 27 February)
- Re: Alt-Svc NOT_AUTHORITATIVE proposal (Thursday, 27 February)
- Re: Alt-Svc NOT_AUTHORITATIVE proposal (Wednesday, 26 February)
- Re: h2#404 requiring gzip and/or deflate (Tuesday, 25 February)
- Re: "Secure" proxies for HTTP URIs [was: new version trusted-proxy20 draft] (Monday, 24 February)
- Re: new version trusted-proxy20 draft (Friday, 21 February)
- Re: h2#404 requiring gzip and/or deflate (Friday, 21 February)
- Re: new version trusted-proxy20 draft (Wednesday, 19 February)
- Re: new version trusted-proxy20 draft (Wednesday, 19 February)
- Re: new version trusted-proxy20 draft (Tuesday, 18 February)
- Re: new version trusted-proxy20 draft (Monday, 17 February)
- Re: new version trusted-proxy20 draft (Friday, 14 February)
- Re: Priorities, draft -10 and our next implementation draft (Thursday, 13 February)
- Re: issue 381: Discovery of the support of the HTTP2 protocol: DNS-based Upgrade (Wednesday, 12 February)
- Re: How to handle HTTP/2 negotiation failure WRT TLS (Monday, 3 February)
- Re: BLOCKED frame. (Monday, 27 January)
- Re: viewport size header (Sunday, 19 January)
- Re: Interim meeting around London? (Thursday, 9 January)
- Re: userinfo in :authority (Tuesday, 7 January)
Paul Ferguson
Paul Hoffman
Peter L
Peter Lepeska
- Re: WPAD ideas and considerations (Saturday, 15 March)
- Re: Preliminary minutes from the Design Team Meeting: WPAD and Proxy.pac (Thursday, 13 March)
- Re: Proxies and packet loss (Friday, 7 March)
- Re: Proxies and packet loss (Friday, 7 March)
- Proxies and packet loss (Wednesday, 5 March)
- Re: "Secure" proxies for HTTP URIs [was: new version trusted-proxy20 draft] (Monday, 3 March)
- Re: Secure Proxy definition [was: "Secure" proxies for HTTP URIs] (Thursday, 27 February)
- Re: "Secure" proxies for HTTP URIs [was: new version trusted-proxy20 draft] (Wednesday, 26 February)
- Re: "Secure" proxies for HTTP URIs [was: new version trusted-proxy20 draft] (Wednesday, 26 February)
- Re: new version trusted-proxy20 draft (Wednesday, 26 February)
- Re: "Secure" proxies for HTTP URIs [was: new version trusted-proxy20 draft] (Wednesday, 26 February)
- Re: new version trusted-proxy20 draft (Wednesday, 26 February)
- Re: new version trusted-proxy20 draft (Wednesday, 26 February)
- Re: new version trusted-proxy20 draft (Wednesday, 19 February)
- Re: Trusted Proxy Alternatives Analysis (Monday, 10 February)
- Re: Trusted Proxy Alternatives Analysis (Friday, 7 February)
- Re: Trusted Proxy Alternatives Analysis (Friday, 7 February)
- Trusted Proxy Alternatives Analysis (Thursday, 6 February)
- Re: Priority straw man (Thursday, 6 February)
- Re: IETF 89 Preliminary Agenda (Monday, 3 February)
- Re: comparing eproxy proposals -- with some corrections (Tuesday, 21 January)
- comparing eproxy proposals -- with some corrections (Sunday, 19 January)
- Re: comparing eproxy proposals (Sunday, 19 January)
- Re: comparing eproxy proposals (Saturday, 18 January)
- comparing eproxy proposals (Saturday, 18 January)
- Re: Proposal: Explicit HTTP2S proxy with any node refusal (Friday, 17 January)
- Re: Comments on draft-chan-http2-stream-dependencies-00 (Thursday, 16 January)
- Re: why not WPAD? (Thursday, 16 January)
- Re: why not WPAD? (Wednesday, 15 January)
- Re: new draft trusted-proxy20-00 (Wednesday, 15 January)
- Re: why not WPAD? (Wednesday, 15 January)
- why not WPAD? (Wednesday, 15 January)
- Re: new draft trusted-proxy20-00 (Wednesday, 15 January)
- Re: new draft trusted-proxy20-00 (Wednesday, 15 January)
- Re: HPACK: replace Huffman by possibly faster and more efficient FSE (Finite State Entropy) (Monday, 6 January)
Phil Hunt
- Clarification requested on use of HTTP Redirect 307 (Wednesday, 29 January)
- Re: GOAWAY -> GTFO (Tuesday, 28 January)
- Re: Clarification on HTTP redirects 301,302, and 307 (Thursday, 16 January)
- Re: Clarification on HTTP redirects 301,302, and 307 (Thursday, 16 January)
- Re: Clarification on HTTP redirects 301,302, and 307 (Thursday, 16 January)
- Clarification on HTTP redirects 301,302, and 307 (Thursday, 16 January)
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-hunt-http-rest-redirect-00.txt (Thursday, 16 January)
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-hunt-http-rest-redirect-00.txt (Thursday, 16 January)
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-hunt-http-rest-redirect-00.txt (Thursday, 16 January)
- Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-hunt-http-rest-redirect-00.txt (Thursday, 16 January)
Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: current HTTP/2 spec prevents gzip of response to "Range" request (Wednesday, 26 March)
- Re: current HTTP/2 spec prevents gzip of response to "Range" request (Wednesday, 26 March)
- Re: current HTTP/2 spec prevents gzip of response to "Range" request (Wednesday, 26 March)
- Re: current HTTP/2 spec prevents gzip of response to "Range" request (Wednesday, 26 March)
- Re: current HTTP/2 spec prevents gzip of response to "Range" request (Wednesday, 26 March)
- Re: current HTTP/2 spec prevents gzip of response to "Range" request (Wednesday, 26 March)
- Re: draft-montenegro-httpbis-uri-encoding (Friday, 21 March)
- Re: draft-montenegro-httpbis-uri-encoding (Friday, 21 March)
- Re: draft-montenegro-httpbis-uri-encoding (Friday, 21 March)
- Re: draft-montenegro-httpbis-uri-encoding (Friday, 21 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Friday, 14 March)
- Re: h2#404 requiring gzip and/or deflate (Thursday, 20 February)
- Re: comparing eproxy proposals (Saturday, 18 January)
- Re: UTF-8 in URIs (Friday, 17 January)
- Re: UTF-8 in URIs (Friday, 17 January)
- Re: UTF-8 in URIs (Thursday, 16 January)
- Re: UTF-8 in URIs (Thursday, 16 January)
- Re: UTF-8 in URIs (Thursday, 16 January)
- Re: UTF-8 in URIs (Wednesday, 15 January)
- Re: HTTP/2 and NCSA (Wednesday, 8 January)
- Re: HTTP/2 and NCSA (Tuesday, 7 January)
- Re: HTTP/2 and NCSA (Monday, 6 January)
- HTTP/2 and NCSA (Monday, 6 January)
Richard Barnes
Richard Wheeldon (rwheeldo)
Rob Trace
Roberto Peon
- Re: h2#404 requiring gzip and/or deflate (Monday, 31 March)
- Re: Dependency based properties (Thursday, 27 March)
- Re: Dependency based properties (Thursday, 27 March)
- Re: Adopting Alternative Services as a WG product (Tuesday, 25 March)
- Re: Adopting Alternative Services as a WG product (Tuesday, 25 March)
- Re: Server push limited to cache priming? (Thursday, 20 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Consensus Call) (Wednesday, 19 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Consensus Call) (Tuesday, 18 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Friday, 14 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Friday, 14 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Friday, 14 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Friday, 14 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Friday, 14 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Friday, 14 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Friday, 14 March)
- Re: PUSH_PROMISE associated stream (Monday, 10 March)
- Re: feedback on draft-nottingham-httpbis-alt-svc (Thursday, 6 March)
- Re: h2#373 HPACK attack mitigation options (Wednesday, 5 March)
- Re: h2#373 HPACK attack mitigation options (Wednesday, 5 March)
- Re: h2#373 HPACK attack mitigation options (Wednesday, 5 March)
- Re: h2#373 HPACK attack mitigation options (Wednesday, 5 March)
- Re: h2#373 HPACK attack mitigation options (Wednesday, 5 March)
- Re: HTTP/2, "h2t" and protocol identifiers in general (Tuesday, 4 March)
- Re: HTTP/2, "h2t" and protocol identifiers in general (Tuesday, 4 March)
- Re: HTTP/2, "h2t" and protocol identifiers in general (Monday, 3 March)
- Re: HTTP/2, "h2t" and protocol identifiers in general (Monday, 3 March)
- Re: HTTP/2, "h2t" and protocol identifiers in general (Monday, 3 March)
- Re: HTTP/2, "h2t" and protocol identifiers in general (Monday, 3 March)
- Re: HTTP/2, "h2t" and protocol identifiers in general (Thursday, 27 February)
- Re: WebSocket over HTTP2 RFC6455 conformance (Wednesday, 26 February)
- Re: HTTP/2, "h2t" and protocol identifiers in general (Wednesday, 26 February)
- Re: h2#416: Limit stream count (Wednesday, 26 February)
- Re: h2#404 requiring gzip and/or deflate (Tuesday, 25 February)
- Re: h2#404 requiring gzip and/or deflate (Tuesday, 25 February)
- Re: h2#404 requiring gzip and/or deflate (Tuesday, 25 February)
- Re: padding and compression (Monday, 24 February)
- Re: padding and compression (Monday, 24 February)
- Re: h2#404 requiring gzip and/or deflate (Friday, 21 February)
- Re: h2#404 requiring gzip and/or deflate (Friday, 21 February)
- Re: h2#404 requiring gzip and/or deflate (Friday, 21 February)
- Re: Padding for PUSH_PROMISE frames (Friday, 14 February)
- Re: Padding for PUSH_PROMISE frames (Friday, 14 February)
- Re: WebSocket over HTTP/2.0 (Friday, 14 February)
- Re: Padding for PUSH_PROMISE frames (Friday, 14 February)
- Re: WINDOW_UPDATE with streamid = 0 redundant? (Tuesday, 11 February)
- Re: WINDOW_UPDATE with streamid = 0 redundant? (Tuesday, 11 February)
- Re: WINDOW_UPDATE with streamid = 0 redundant? (Tuesday, 11 February)
- Re: HPACK padding (Friday, 7 February)
- Re: Priority straw man (Friday, 7 February)
- HPack changes (Wednesday, 5 February)
- Re: Compression ratio of HPACK. (Thursday, 30 January)
- Re: Server Push -> Cache Push? (Thursday, 30 January)
- Re: Server Push -> Cache Push? (Thursday, 30 January)
- Re: GOAWAY -> GTFO (Tuesday, 28 January)
- Re: BLOCKED frame. (Sunday, 26 January)
- BLOCKED frame. (Saturday, 25 January)
- Re: comparing eproxy proposals (Saturday, 18 January)
- Re: Comments on draft-chan-http2-stream-dependencies-00 (Wednesday, 15 January)
- Re: Security Condideration of initial SETTINGS_MAX_CONCURRENT_STREAMS (Wednesday, 15 January)
- Re: Security Condideration of initial SETTINGS_MAX_CONCURRENT_STREAMS (Wednesday, 15 January)
- Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-chan-http2-stream-dependencies-00.txt (Tuesday, 14 January)
- Re: Interim meeting around London? (Thursday, 9 January)
- Re: Error behevior of receiving PUSH_PROMISE when SETTINGS_ENABLE_PUSH is 0 (Thursday, 9 January)
- Re: minimum value for SETTINGS_MAX_CONCURRENT_STREAMS (Sunday, 5 January)
Roland Zink
- Re: current HTTP/2 spec prevents gzip of response to "Range" request (Friday, 28 March)
- Re: current HTTP/2 spec prevents gzip of response to "Range" request (Wednesday, 26 March)
- Re: current HTTP/2 spec prevents gzip of response to "Range" request (Wednesday, 26 March)
- Re: current HTTP/2 spec prevents gzip of response to "Range" request (Wednesday, 26 March)
- Re: current HTTP/2 spec prevents gzip of response to "Range" request (Wednesday, 26 March)
- Re: current HTTP/2 spec prevents gzip of response to "Range" request (Wednesday, 26 March)
- Re: current HTTP/2 spec prevents gzip of response to "Range" request (Wednesday, 26 March)
- Re: current HTTP/2 spec prevents gzip of response to "Range" request (Tuesday, 25 March)
- Re: current HTTP/2 spec prevents gzip of response to "Range" request (Monday, 24 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Consensus Call) (Friday, 21 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Consensus Call) (Friday, 21 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Consensus Call) (Friday, 21 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Saturday, 15 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Friday, 14 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Friday, 14 March)
- Re: h2#373 HPACK attack mitigation options (Wednesday, 5 March)
- Re: "Secure" proxies for HTTP URIs [was: new version trusted-proxy20 draft] (Monday, 3 March)
- Re: new version trusted-proxy20 draft (Tuesday, 25 February)
- Re: new version trusted-proxy20 draft (Thursday, 20 February)
Roy T. Fielding
- Re: current HTTP/2 spec prevents gzip of response to "Range" request (Tuesday, 25 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Consensus Call) (Monday, 24 March)
- Re: current HTTP/2 spec prevents gzip of response to "Range" request (Monday, 24 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Consensus Call) (Tuesday, 18 March)
- Re: HTTP/1.1 proxy behavior when Host differs from absoluteURI (Thursday, 13 March)
- Re: TE / transfer-coding issue with qvalue and transfer-parameters — HTTP/1.1, HTTP/2.0 (Wednesday, 5 February)
- Re: #549: augmented security considerations in p1 (Saturday, 1 February)
- Re: #552: allow privacy proxies to be conformant (Saturday, 1 February)
- Re: #551: recipient handling of trailer fields (Saturday, 1 February)
- Re: #549: augmented security considerations in p1 (Saturday, 1 February)
- #549: augmented security considerations in p1 (Friday, 31 January)
- Re: #552: allow privacy proxies to be conformant (Wednesday, 29 January)
- #552: allow privacy proxies to be conformant (Wednesday, 29 January)
- #551: recipient handling of trailer fields (Friday, 24 January)
- Re: #532 draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-25, "5.7.2 Transformations" (Sunday, 19 January)
RUELLAN Herve
Ryan Hamilton
Salvatore Loreto
- Re: Preliminary minutes from the Design Team Meeting: WPAD and Proxy.pac (Thursday, 13 March)
- Secure Proxy definition [was: "Secure" proxies for HTTP URIs] (Thursday, 27 February)
- Re: WebSocket over HTTP2 RFC6455 conformance (Thursday, 27 February)
- Re: HTTP/2, "h2t" and protocol identifiers in general (Wednesday, 26 February)
- Re: The "trusted" / "explicit" proxy discussion: ML for HTTP2 proxy discussion ? (Tuesday, 25 February)
- Re: new version trusted-proxy20 draft (Monday, 24 February)
- Re: new version trusted-proxy20 draft (Monday, 24 February)
- Re: "Secure" proxies for HTTP URIs [was: new version trusted-proxy20 draft] (Monday, 24 February)
- Re: new version trusted-proxy20 draft (Monday, 24 February)
- Re: new version trusted-proxy20 draft (Monday, 24 February)
- Re: "Secure" proxies for HTTP URIs [was: new version trusted-proxy20 draft] (Monday, 24 February)
- Re: new version trusted-proxy20 draft (Wednesday, 19 February)
- Re: new version trusted-proxy20 draft (Wednesday, 19 February)
- Re: new version trusted-proxy20 draft (Wednesday, 19 February)
- Re: new version trusted-proxy20 draft (Wednesday, 19 February)
- Re: new version trusted-proxy20 draft (Wednesday, 19 February)
- Re: new version trusted-proxy20 draft (Tuesday, 18 February)
- Re: new version trusted-proxy20 draft (Tuesday, 18 February)
- Re: new version trusted-proxy20 draft (Tuesday, 18 February)
- Re: new version trusted-proxy20 draft (Tuesday, 18 February)
- Re: new version trusted-proxy20 draft (Monday, 17 February)
- Re: new version trusted-proxy20 draft (Monday, 17 February)
- new version trusted-proxy20 draft (Friday, 14 February)
- Re: issue 381: Discovery of the support of the HTTP2 protocol: DNS-based Upgrade (Wednesday, 12 February)
- Re: new draft trusted-proxy20-00 (Tuesday, 11 February)
- Re: new draft trusted-proxy20-00 (Tuesday, 11 February)
- Re: new draft trusted-proxy20-00 (Tuesday, 11 February)
- Re: Trusted Proxy Alternatives Analysis (Sunday, 9 February)
- Re: Trusted Proxy Alternatives Analysis (Sunday, 9 February)
- Re: Server Push -> Cache Push? (Sunday, 2 February)
- new draft trusted-proxy20-00 (Friday, 10 January)
- Re: Interim meeting around London? (Friday, 10 January)
Shigeki Ohtsu
Simon Yarde
- Re: TE / transfer-coding issue with qvalue and transfer-parameters — HTTP/1.1, HTTP/2.0 (Monday, 3 February)
- Re: TE / transfer-coding issue with qvalue and transfer-parameters — HTTP/1.1, HTTP/2.0 (Monday, 3 February)
- Re: TE / transfer-coding issue with qvalue and transfer-parameters — HTTP/1.1, HTTP/2.0 (Monday, 3 February)
- TE / transfer-coding issue with qvalue and transfer-parameters — HTTP/1.1, HTTP/2.0 (Monday, 3 February)
- Re: GOAWAY -> GTFO (Wednesday, 29 January)
- Re: GOAWAY -> GTFO (Tuesday, 28 January)
SM
Smith, Kevin, (R&D) Vodafone Group
Stefan Eissing
Stephen Farrell
SUNGHAN WIPO
Takeshi Yoshino
Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa
- Re: Dependency based properties (Saturday, 29 March)
- Re: Dependency based properties (Thursday, 27 March)
- Dependency based properties (Thursday, 27 March)
- Time out error code for HTTP/2 stream? (Friday, 21 March)
- Re: HPACK edge cases (Saturday, 8 March)
- Re: HPACK edge cases (Friday, 7 March)
- Re: debug field in GOAWAY (Friday, 21 February)
- debug field in GOAWAY (Friday, 21 February)
- Re: Re-work of op-code patterns (Wednesday, 12 February)
- Re: HPACK padding (Saturday, 8 February)
- Re: HPACK padding (Saturday, 8 February)
- Re: Priority straw man (Thursday, 6 February)
- Re: Priority straw man (Thursday, 30 January)
- Re: Priority straw man (Wednesday, 29 January)
- Re: Comments on draft-chan-http2-stream-dependencies-00 (Sunday, 19 January)
- Re: Questions in draft-09 (Wednesday, 8 January)
- Re: Questions in draft-09 (Wednesday, 8 January)
- Re: Questions in draft-09 (Tuesday, 7 January)
Ted Hardie
Ted Johnson
The IESG
Thomas Fossati
Tim Bray
Tim Wicinski
Tony Hansen
Wenbo Zhu
Willy Tarreau
Yoav Nir
- Re: FYI: proposal for client authentication in TLS (Tuesday, 11 March)
- Re: FYI: proposal for client authentication in TLS (Tuesday, 11 March)
- Re: FYI: proposal for client authentication in TLS (Tuesday, 11 March)
- Re: FYI: proposal for client authentication in TLS (Tuesday, 11 March)
- Re: TLS renegotiation (Tuesday, 4 February)
- Re: IETF 89 Preliminary Agenda (Monday, 3 February)
- Re: TLS renegotiation (Monday, 3 February)
- Re: TLS renegotiation (Wednesday, 29 January)
- Re: GOAWAY -> GTFO (Wednesday, 29 January)
- RE: TLS renegotiation (Wednesday, 29 January)
- Re: GOAWAY -> GTFO (Tuesday, 28 January)
- Re: new draft trusted-proxy20-00 (Monday, 13 January)
Yutaka Hirano
- Re: WebSocket over HTTP/2.0 (Thursday, 27 March)
- Re: WebSocket over HTTP/2.0 (Monday, 24 March)
- ALTSVC and mixed scheme (Thursday, 20 March)
- Re: HTTP/2, "h2t" and protocol identifiers in general (Monday, 17 March)
- Re: HTTP/2, "h2t" and protocol identifiers in general (Monday, 17 March)
- Re: WebSocket over HTTP2 RFC6455 conformance (Wednesday, 26 February)
- Re: WebSocket over HTTP2 RFC6455 conformance (Friday, 21 February)
- Re: WebSocket over HTTP2 RFC6455 conformance (Thursday, 20 February)
- Re: WebSocket over HTTP/2.0 (Wednesday, 19 February)
- WebSocket over HTTP2 RFC6455 conformance (Wednesday, 19 February)
- WebSocket over HTTP/2.0 (Friday, 14 February)
Yutaka OIWA
Yves Lafon
Zhong Yu
- Re: current HTTP/2 spec prevents gzip of response to "Range" request (Wednesday, 26 March)
- Re: current HTTP/2 spec prevents gzip of response to "Range" request (Wednesday, 26 March)
- Re: current HTTP/2 spec prevents gzip of response to "Range" request (Monday, 24 March)
- Re: current HTTP/2 spec prevents gzip of response to "Range" request (Monday, 24 March)
- Re: draft-montenegro-httpbis-uri-encoding (Monday, 24 March)
- Re: draft-montenegro-httpbis-uri-encoding (Saturday, 22 March)
- Re: h2#404 requiring gzip and/or deflate (Friday, 21 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Consensus Call) (Friday, 21 March)
- Re: draft-montenegro-httpbis-uri-encoding (Friday, 21 March)
- Re: draft-montenegro-httpbis-uri-encoding (Friday, 21 March)
- Re: draft-montenegro-httpbis-uri-encoding (Friday, 21 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Friday, 14 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Friday, 14 March)
- Re: h2#404 requiring gzip and/or deflate (Tuesday, 25 February)
- Re: h2#404 requiring gzip and/or deflate (Friday, 21 February)
- Re: h2#404 requiring gzip and/or deflate (Friday, 21 February)
- Re: GOAWAY -> GTFO (Wednesday, 29 January)
- Re: GOAWAY -> GTFO (Tuesday, 28 January)
- Re: UTF-8 in URIs (Saturday, 18 January)
- Re: UTF-8 in URIs (Friday, 17 January)
- Re: UTF-8 in URIs (Thursday, 16 January)
- Re: UTF-8 in URIs (Thursday, 16 January)
- Re: UTF-8 in URIs (Wednesday, 15 January)
山本和彦
- Re: padding and compression (Friday, 28 February)
- Re: The first settings (Friday, 28 February)
- Re: The first settings (Thursday, 27 February)
- Re: The first settings (Monday, 24 February)
- Re: The first settings (Monday, 24 February)
- padding and compression (Monday, 24 February)
- The first settings (Monday, 24 February)
- Re: HPACK analysis (Friday, 7 February)
- Re: Reasons to not use huffman encoding? (Friday, 31 January)
- Re: Compression ratio of HPACK. (Friday, 31 January)
- Re: Compression ratio of HPACK. (Friday, 31 January)
- Compression ratio of HPACK. (Thursday, 30 January)
陈智昌
- Alt-Svc related Chromium bug report (proxy related) (Monday, 31 March)
- Re: Getting to consensus on HTTP:// over TLS (Tuesday, 25 March)
- Re: Adopting Alternative Services as a WG product (Tuesday, 25 March)
- Re: June Interim dates / location (Monday, 24 March)
- Re: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-httpbis-alt-svc as a normative reference in http/2 (Thursday, 20 March)
- Re: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-httpbis-alt-svc as a normative reference in http/2 (Thursday, 20 March)
- Re: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-httpbis-alt-svc as a normative reference in http/2 (Thursday, 20 March)
- Re: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-httpbis-alt-svc as a normative reference in http/2 (Wednesday, 19 March)
- Re: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-httpbis-alt-svc as a normative reference in http/2 (Wednesday, 19 March)
- Re: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-httpbis-alt-svc as a normative reference in http/2 (Wednesday, 19 March)
- Re: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-httpbis-alt-svc as a normative reference in http/2 (Wednesday, 19 March)
- http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-httpbis-alt-svc as a normative reference in http/2 (Wednesday, 19 March)
- Re: Server push limited to cache priming? (Wednesday, 19 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Tuesday, 18 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Monday, 17 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Sunday, 16 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Friday, 14 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Friday, 14 March)
- Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Friday, 14 March)
- Re: feedback on draft-nottingham-httpbis-alt-svc (Thursday, 6 March)
- Re: Proxies and packet loss (Wednesday, 5 March)
- Re: HTTP/2, "h2t" and protocol identifiers in general (Tuesday, 4 March)
- Re: issue 381: Discovery of the support of the HTTP2 protocol: DNS-based Upgrade (Thursday, 27 February)
- Re: Alt-Svc NOT_AUTHORITATIVE proposal (Thursday, 27 February)
- Re: Alt-Svc NOT_AUTHORITATIVE proposal (Thursday, 27 February)
- Re: HTTP/2, "h2t" and protocol identifiers in general (Thursday, 27 February)
- Re: new version trusted-proxy20 draft (Wednesday, 26 February)
- Re: new version trusted-proxy20 draft (Wednesday, 26 February)
- Re: new version trusted-proxy20 draft (Wednesday, 26 February)
- Re: "Secure" proxies for HTTP URIs [was: new version trusted-proxy20 draft] (Wednesday, 26 February)
- Re: new version trusted-proxy20 draft (Monday, 24 February)
- Re: new version trusted-proxy20 draft (Monday, 24 February)
- Re: "Secure" proxies for HTTP URIs [was: new version trusted-proxy20 draft] (Monday, 24 February)
- Re: "Secure" proxies for HTTP URIs [was: new version trusted-proxy20 draft] (Monday, 24 February)
- Re: new version trusted-proxy20 draft (Thursday, 20 February)
- Re: new version trusted-proxy20 draft (Thursday, 20 February)
- Re: new version trusted-proxy20 draft (Wednesday, 19 February)
- Re: new version trusted-proxy20 draft (Wednesday, 19 February)
- Re: new version trusted-proxy20 draft (Wednesday, 19 February)
- Re: new version trusted-proxy20 draft (Wednesday, 19 February)
- Re: new version trusted-proxy20 draft (Wednesday, 19 February)
- Re: new version trusted-proxy20 draft (Wednesday, 19 February)
- Re: new version trusted-proxy20 draft (Wednesday, 19 February)
- Re: issue 381: Discovery of the support of the HTTP2 protocol: DNS-based Upgrade (Wednesday, 19 February)
- Re: Priorities, draft -10 and our next implementation draft (Thursday, 13 February)
- Re: Reg spydy implementations (Wednesday, 12 February)
- Re: WINDOW_UPDATE with streamid = 0 redundant? (Tuesday, 11 February)
- Re: Priority straw man (Saturday, 8 February)
- Re: Priority straw man (Friday, 7 February)
- Re: User defined SETTINGS frame extensions (Friday, 7 February)
- Re: Trusted Proxy Alternatives Analysis (Friday, 7 February)
- Re: User defined SETTINGS frame extensions (Friday, 7 February)
- Re: How to handle HTTP/2 negotiation failure WRT TLS (Wednesday, 5 February)
- Re: How to handle HTTP/2 negotiation failure WRT TLS (Wednesday, 5 February)
- Re: http/2 presentation at a large Java conference (Wednesday, 5 February)
- Re: How to handle HTTP/2 negotiation failure WRT TLS (Saturday, 1 February)
- Re: How to handle HTTP/2 negotiation failure WRT TLS (Saturday, 1 February)
- Re: How to handle HTTP/2 negotiation failure WRT TLS (Saturday, 1 February)
- Re: How to handle HTTP/2 negotiation failure WRT TLS (Saturday, 1 February)
- Re: How to handle HTTP/2 negotiation failure WRT TLS (Thursday, 30 January)
- How to handle HTTP/2 negotiation failure WRT TLS (Thursday, 30 January)
- Re: Comments on draft-chan-http2-stream-dependencies-00 (Wednesday, 15 January)
- Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-chan-http2-stream-dependencies-00.txt (Wednesday, 15 January)
- Re: Comments on draft-chan-http2-stream-dependencies-00 (Wednesday, 15 January)
- Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-chan-http2-stream-dependencies-00.txt (Tuesday, 14 January)
- Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-chan-http2-stream-dependencies-00.txt (Monday, 13 January)
- Re: Does anyone know if F5 are working on http/2 (Friday, 10 January)
- Re: HTTP/2 stream state Reserved can only go to Half-Closed (Thursday, 9 January)
- Re: Interim meeting around London? (Thursday, 9 January)
- HTTP/2 stream state Reserved can only go to Half-Closed (Thursday, 9 January)
- Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-chan-http2-stream-dependencies-00.txt (Monday, 6 January)
- Re: minimum value for SETTINGS_MAX_CONCURRENT_STREAMS (Sunday, 5 January)
- Re: minimum value for SETTINGS_MAX_CONCURRENT_STREAMS (Friday, 3 January)
Last message date: Monday, 31 March 2014 23:53:06 UTC