Re: HTTP/2, "h2t" and protocol identifiers in general

On 27 Feb 2014, at 6:22 pm, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:

> (As proposed by Mark, "h2" would be exclusively for HTTP/2 over
> cleartext TCP; I'd prefer to swap the labels, but we know what we call
> that sort of argument.)

I’d be OK with “h2” for TLS and something like “h2p” (for “plaintext”).

--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/

Received on Friday, 28 February 2014 16:09:31 UTC