W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2014

Re: HTTP/2, "h2t" and protocol identifiers in general

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 16:09:03 +0000
Cc: (wrong string) 陈智昌)" <willchan@chromium.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <4140D5AE-DAED-49EE-992C-9EC2BAAF4DFA@mnot.net>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>

On 27 Feb 2014, at 6:22 pm, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:

> (As proposed by Mark, "h2" would be exclusively for HTTP/2 over
> cleartext TCP; I'd prefer to swap the labels, but we know what we call
> that sort of argument.)

Id be OK with h2 for TLS and something like h2p (for plaintext).

Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Friday, 28 February 2014 16:09:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:24 UTC