- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 23:00:48 +0100
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
* Julian Reschke wrote: >During IESG review, Ted Lemon came up with this interesting DISCUSS >(<http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/550>): >I (telnet-)tested this with various servers, and they don't seem to >bother checking the port number. > >So we could clarify that this request is invalid, but I'm not sure we >can add a normative requirement to fail the request. It seems it would also be possible to say the actual port connected to takes precedence (where applicable). Would that cause any problems? -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Thursday, 16 January 2014 22:01:20 UTC