- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 14:14:28 +1100
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Cc: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, "William Chan (ιζΊζ)" <willchan@chromium.org>, "Julian F. Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 26 Mar 2014, at 10:52 am, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote: > OK, we're golden. The only things I didn't do, but would like to, are: > > a) I'd like to lose the reserved bits. OK by me. > b) Like Roberto, I'm made uncomfortable by the asymmetry of the stream > 0/not stream 0 uses of the same frame. Can we remove the > stream-related use of ALTSVC and require that it be on stream 0? The > Alt-Svc header field should suffice for stream-related tasks. See previous message. -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Thursday, 27 March 2014 03:12:44 UTC