- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 14:00:08 +0000
- To: William Chan (陈智昌) <willchan@chromium.org>
- Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 6 March 2014 13:53, William Chan (陈智昌) <willchan@chromium.org> wrote: > When we say we want to do this, does that mean we have to put in Section 3.6 > [1] too in the HTTP/2 spec or something normatively referenced? As I understand it, we more or less agreed to the header field, the frame and the not authoritative error/status code. I don't think that there was strong enough agreement regarding Section 3.6, but I'll let Mark rule on that, maybe after some discussion. I believe that the changes would touch a number of sections in the draft, regardless of whether it's inlined or not.
Received on Thursday, 6 March 2014 14:00:47 UTC