Re: WebSocket over HTTP/2.0

>
> I've rewritten the Protocol Negotiation part (Section 3 and Section 4.2.1).
> It now uses Alt-Svc instead of SETTINGS_SUPPORTED_SCHEMES.

Note that the protocol negotiation and the opening handshake parts are
shared among both
WS-over-HTTP/2 drafts (tunneling and message mapping).
Since the protocol negotiation would have a greater impact on other specs
(http/2, alt-svc, etc),
I would like to discuss it earlier than the data framing, to find problems
in time for the deadlines of such specs.

Thanks,



On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Yutaka Hirano <yhirano@google.com> wrote:

> I've rewritten the Protocol Negotiation part (Section 3 and Section 4.2.1).
> It now uses Alt-Svc instead of SETTINGS_SUPPORTED_SCHEMES.
>
>
> https://github.com/yutakahirano/ws-over-http2/blob/master/draft-hirano-websocket-over-http2.txt
>
> Comments will be appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 4:34 AM, Takeshi Yoshino <tyoshino@google.com>wrote:
>
>> BTW, introduction of the SETTINGS_SUPPORTED_SCHEMES parameter for the
>> SETTINGS frame in the proposal could be discussed separately from the
>> framing discussion. It seems Mark's Alt-Svc I-D also has similar proposal
>> called SETTINGS_UNIVERSAL_SCHEMES [1] though in a different context.
>>
>> [1]
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-httpbis-alt-svc-03#section-3.4
>>
>
>