W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2014

Improving detection of unsupported Content-Codings, was: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Consensus Call)

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 08:53:08 +0100
Message-ID: <533135E4.4000506@gmx.de>
To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2014-03-25 00:49, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> ...
>>> So if we want to go down that route, we could recommend a 415 and in addition elevate "Accept-Encoding" to a response header field that could be used with 415.
>> That seems to make sense, but it isn't something specific to HTTP/2, and it's extending the semantics of a HTTP/1 header field. That sounds like a new spec that updates p2-semantics.
>> Julian, do you want to sketch that out so people can have a look?

I can.

> Please, no.  Changing CE transforms the content.  That means it is
> destructive unless done with full knowledge of the publication chain
> (i.e., how does the origin server know whether the client wants the
> representation to be compressed or just the transfer to be compressed?).

This is not about *changing* CE but simply about making it clearer how 
to signal errors (when the server doesn't support the CE used in the 

> You should be talking about transfer encodings and advertised server
> settings, not CE.

Yes. That too.

Best regards, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 25 March 2014 07:53:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:25 UTC