- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 10:43:12 -0800
- To: Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 27 January 2014 10:38, Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com> wrote: > It would be cleaner if priority groups had the same cardinality as stream > identifiers. That would remove the edge case of more open streams than > groups. I assume here that you are talking about the case where you want to maintain greater than 2^24 open groups. I'm really not sympathetic to that scenario to be honest. That's 16+ million concurrent partitions. Of course, I'd be impressed if you could prove that you were able to manage 16+ million-way-concurrency with anything better than random results.
Received on Monday, 27 January 2014 18:43:39 UTC