- From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>
- Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 02:13:10 -0800
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Actually, this is about #531, but I'll leave the subject intact ... On Jan 16, 2014, at 2:34 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: > <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-25.html#rfc.section.5.7.2>: > > "A non-transforming proxy MUST NOT modify the message payload (Section 3.3 of [Part2]). A transforming proxy MUST NOT modify the payload of a message that contains the no-transform cache-control directive. > > A transforming proxy MAY transform the payload of a message that does not contain the no-transform cache-control directive; if the payload is transformed, the transforming proxy MUST add a Warning header field with the warn-code of 214 ("Transformation Applied") if one does not already appear in the message (see Section 5.5 of [Part6]). If the payload of a 200 (OK) response is transformed, the transforming proxy can also inform downstream recipients that a transformation has been applied by changing the response status code to 203 (Non-Authoritative Information) (Section 6.3.4 of [Part2])." > > In the IESG review comments, Pete Resnick notes: > >> I get the second sentence. But isn't the first a definition of a non-transforming proxy? Is so, I think you should change "MUST NOT" to "will not" or "does not". > > I really don't care whether we phrase this as a statement of fact or a requirement. > > What bothers me more is that we have two normative requirements on transforming proxies, split over two paragraphs. > > Maybe we should re-structure this, as in...: > > "A non-transforming proxy MUST NOT modify the message payload (Section 3.3 of [Part2]). > > A transforming proxy MUST NOT modify the payload of a message unless it does not contain the no-transform cache-control directive; if the payload is transformed, the transforming proxy MUST add a Warning header field with the warn-code of 214 ("Transformation Applied") if one does not already appear in the message (see Section 5.5 of [Part6]). If the payload of a 200 (OK) response is transformed, the transforming proxy can also inform downstream recipients that a transformation has been applied by changing the response status code to 203 (Non-Authoritative Information) (Section 6.3.4 of [Part2])." > > ? > > Best regards, Julian I have addressed this in http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/changeset/2563#file1 by removing the separate definition of non-transforming proxy (it is only used in this section), moving the definition of transforming proxy here (from the architecture section), and rephrasing the requirements so that they say what a proxy MUST do if it does transform. ....Roy
Received on Sunday, 19 January 2014 10:13:33 UTC