W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2014

Re: Clarification on HTTP redirects 301,302, and 307

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 21:48:08 +0100
Message-ID: <52D84588.2030008@gmx.de>
To: Phil Hunt <phil.hunt@oracle.com>
CC: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2014-01-16 21:43, Phil Hunt wrote:
> What is the objection to 308?

It's new. We can't put it into RFC2616bis due to our charter.

> If there is good reason not to use it, why not pick another code?

The spec is already approved and the status code is registered.

That being said, Chrome hasn't made any progress implementing it because 
it conflicts with an internal use of 308 in the Google Drive HTTP binding.

Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 16 January 2014 20:48:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:23 UTC