- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 21:48:08 +0100
- To: Phil Hunt <phil.hunt@oracle.com>
- CC: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2014-01-16 21:43, Phil Hunt wrote: > What is the objection to 308? It's new. We can't put it into RFC2616bis due to our charter. > If there is good reason not to use it, why not pick another code? The spec is already approved and the status code is registered. That being said, Chrome hasn't made any progress implementing it because it conflicts with an internal use of 308 in the Google Drive HTTP binding. Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 16 January 2014 20:48:42 UTC