W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2014

Re: Priorities, draft -10 and our next implementation draft

From: Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 07:49:00 -0500
Message-ID: <CAOdDvNqq7Nbh7199f7M0rfFnKt4K-WmtFJRJLvn88uZfcxDQ-A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
i agree we should take this to london


On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 10:14 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:

> We discussed priority levelling <
> https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/issues/270> in Zurich, and decided
> there to take Roberto's "Weighted Dependency Tree" approach.
>
> However, discussion on the list since has moved on to other proposals,
> especially Osama's: <
> http://www.w3.org/mid/f2d284792b50431685dc551141945bec@SN2PR03MB046.namprd03.prod.outlook.com
> >
>
> It's not clear to me that we have consensus on one approach here yet.
>
> We also said that we'd put out another Implementation Draft before London,
> but with the date fast approaching, we need to either choose one quickly or
> defer the Implementation Draft.
>
> Unless we converge in the next day or so, I think Martin should ship a
> draft -10 with the "vanilla" priority field as before, and we can discuss
> this issue in more depth in London (presumably shipping an implementation
> draft shortly thereafter).
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 13 February 2014 12:49:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:24 UTC