W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2014

Re: Support for gzip at the server #424

From: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 18:24:22 -0700
Message-ID: <CAP+FsNdhN09WRGFxG_K+C71VqtJR7xH_PmTQOjasrAj67fOEDA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Decompress, yes, buffer the entire body? No. Gzip can happily be

On Mar 10, 2014 2:03 AM, "Martin Thomson" <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:

> Discussion offline leads me to conclude that doing this would be bad idea.
> The basic problem is with 2->1.1 translation at intermediaries.  While
> the HTTP/2 request might include a Content-Length, the gateway is
> going to be forced to decompress and buffer the entire request body
> before forwarding to a 1.1 server.
> This doesn't seem like a good outcome.  Maybe this is something to
> defer to the version of HTTP/x that ships when most of the world is
> already using HTTP/2.
Received on Friday, 14 March 2014 01:24:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:24 UTC