- From: Zhong Yu <zhong.j.yu@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 12:35:08 -0600
- To: pr3d4t0r.w3c@cime.net
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 10:25 AM, CIURANA EUGENE (pr3d4t0r) <pr3d4t0r.w3c@cime.net> wrote: > > >>> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Adrian Cole <adrian.f.cole@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> FWIW, when GTFO was suggested last week at the working group, all people >>>> present had an opportunity to dissent and I heard not a single dissent >>>> voiced! >>>> >>>> That said, I wouldn't conflate above PR/commit as a "popular move" as >>>> who >>>> knows.. GOAWAY might actually lose a popular vote vs GTFO! >>>> >>>> That said, silencing the argument is likely a popular move, so maybe the >>>> description still fits. > > > I expressed this in the GitHub comments about the issue, echoing it here as > well because this mailing list has a wider audience. > > Use of GTFO is fine. Anyone arguing that because foreign speakers may not > understand potential slang is being naïve or needs to get out more. I've I need to get out? Out where? Do I need to get the fuck out? The phrase "get the fuck out" has multiple meanings, often depending on the context and the tone of speaking, like all slangs. For a non-native English speaker to understand the nuance and subtlety, forget-about-it. I apologize for joining in this conversation; I will STFU now. Zhong Yu > managed development teams in Moscow, Novosibirsk, Kiev, the San Francisco > Bay Area, London, and Japan. The use of slang or jargon derived from > English in technical documentation, implementations, code, or configuration > has never deterred anybody from applying the appropriate knowledge. GOAWAY > vs. GTFO -- if I were to implement a server or a client handler for this, > I'd go for GTFO as the most meaningful (and perhaps get a secret chuckle, > sure). > > So -- can we keep this instead? Think of HTTP status code 418 IMATEAPOT > (which is Russian slang for "I don't know what I'm doing"). Not many web > servers or app servers implement it, granted, but it's part of the official > spec. And I've known teams in the US and Europe who've used 418 as a > placeholder for an app RESTful handler that is only mocked up/yet to be > implemented. > > Just my $0,02. > > Cheers! > > E > > -- > http://eugeneciurana.com | http://ciurana.eu > >
Received on Wednesday, 29 January 2014 18:35:35 UTC