Re: HPACK padding

On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa
<tatsuhiro.t@gmail.com>wrote:

>
> 2014/02/08 2:46 "Martin Thomson" <martin.thomson@gmail.com>:
>
> >
> > I'm going to do this.  If I hear screams, I have the power to back out
> > the relevant commits.
> >
>
> How about put pad_high and pad_low right after frame header for HEADERS
> frame? The padding is to a frame and this arrangement is common to other
> frames.
>

I mean this: https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/pull/380

Best regards,

Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa

 > On 7 February 2014 07:43, RUELLAN Herve <Herve.Ruellan@crf.canon.fr>
> wrote:
> > > For solving issue #346, HPACK padding, Roberto proposed to extend the
> padding mechanism for DATA frames to HEADER and CONTINUATION frames.
> > >
> > > I think that makes sense : we have only one padding mechanism. As
> such, we have one central location for deciding whether padding is
> necessary in regards of all the available information.
> > >
> > > Any though?
> > >
> > > Hervé.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>