Re: Support for gzip at the server #424 (Consensus Call)

We don't have transfer-codings in HTTP/2.

Cheers,


On 18 Mar 2014, at 4:53 pm, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz> wrote:

> On 18/03/2014 4:50 p.m., Mark Nottingham wrote:
>> It sounds like we have consensus to close #424 with no action. Anyone have a problem with that?
>> 
> 
> Is it worth proposing gzip as default Transfer-Encoding instead so its
> only done on DATA frames between hops known to be HTTP/2 at both ends?
> (ie after SETTINGS already confirms or breaks the connection).
> 
> Amos
> 
> 

--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/

Received on Tuesday, 18 March 2014 06:22:17 UTC